363
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a nationwide investigation on survival

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 206-212 | Received 20 Feb 2019, Accepted 23 May 2019, Published online: 07 Jun 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and its effect on survival patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, these RCTs have limited external validity and generalisability and, therefore, the current study aims to use real world evidence in the form of observational data to identify the effect that NAC may have on survival, compared to the use of radical cystectomy (RC) alone.

Materials and methods: The study cohort (consisting of 944 patients) was selected as a target trial from the Bladder Cancer Data Base Sweden (BladderBaSe). This study calculated 5-year survival and risk of bladder cancer (BC)-specific and overall death by Cox proportional hazard models for the study cohort and a propensity score (PS) matched cohort.

Results: Those who had received NAC had higher 5-year survival proportions and decreased risk of both overall and BC specific death (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.52–0.97 and HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48–0.94), respectively, as compared to patients who did not receive NAC. The PS matched cohort showed similar estimates, but with larger statistical uncertainty (Overall death: HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.53–1.09 and BC-specific death: HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.50–1.07).

Conclusion: Results from the current observational study found similar point estimates for 5-year survival and of relative risks as previous studies. However, the results based on real world evidence had larger statistical variability, resulting in a non-statistically significant effect of NAC on survival. Future studies with detailed validated data can be used to further investigate the effect of NAC in narrower patient groups.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Lars Holmberg and Hans Garmo for their support. This project was made possible with help of the data collected in the SNRUBC, and we would like to thank the members of the SNRUBC: Viveka Ströck, Firas Abdul-Sattar Aljabery, Johan Johansson, Per-Uno Malmström, Malcolm Carringer, Abolfazl Hosseini-Aliabad, Truls Gårdmark, Amir Sherif, Roland Rux, Markus Johansson, Petter Kollberg, Anna-Karin Lind, Jenny Wanegård, Magdalena Cwikiel, Elisabeth Överholm, Anders Ullen, Erika Jonsson, Helena Thulin, Gun Danielsson, Helene Hummer, Fredrik Liedberg, and Staffan Jahnson.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.