194
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Applying quality function deployment to the design of engineering programmes: approaches, insights and benefits

Pages 138-151 | Received 25 Feb 2020, Accepted 09 Apr 2020, Published online: 14 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Tertiary programmes in a discipline such as engineering must balance the competing needs of two key stakeholders: the university that designs and delivers the programme, and the professional body that accredits it . Programme and curriculum design in universities is traditionally bottom-up in nature, with courses designed by individual academics, and assembled into cognate programmes. Graduate qualities and accreditation criteria are mapped retrospectively onto the structure. Designing programmes from the top down, driven byuniversity and the accreditation body needs, is a desirable goal. However, without proper support tools, balancing competing needs across multiple courses and year levels is a complex task. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) was created for this precise purpose. Treating the design of a tertiary programme the same as the design of a system suggests that QFD, and the implementation tool known as the House of Quality (HoQ), should be ideally suited to this purpose. The aim of this paper is to show how QFD and the HoQ can be applied to the design of an engineering programme, creating a specification that accurately reflects the voices of stakeholders, and serves as a benchmark for validating that these needs have been met in the implemented design.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. In traditional HoQ methodology, these mappings are indicated at one of three strengths. ‘1’ indicates a weak relationship, ‘3’ a moderate relationship, and ‘9’ a strong relationship. In the example presented here it is assumed that all relationships are strong, and the tick represents this strong relationship.

2. Full details of the Engineers Australia Stage 1 Competencies, and the 16 mandatory elements of competency, can be found at: https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2017-03/Stage%201%20Competency%20Standards.pdf.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

David H. Cropley

Professor David Cropley is the Professor of Engineering Innovation at the University of South Australia. He teaches systems engineering concepts and principles to undergraduate and postgraduate students. Professor Cropley's research addresses a range of issues in creativity and innovation, including the role that these factors play in engineering design.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.