2,505
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter

Pig as a reservoir of CRISPR type TST4 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium monophasic variant during 2009–2017 in China

, , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1-4 | Received 18 Jul 2019, Accepted 25 Nov 2019, Published online: 20 Dec 2019

ABSTRACT

CRISPR-based typing was performed to subtype isolates of S. Typhimurium and its monophasic variant Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- from humans and animals between 2009 and 2017 in China. CRISPR typing classified all isolates into two lineages and four sub-lineages. All isolates from Lineage II and Lineage IB-1 were Salmonella Typhimurium. All of Salmonella 4,[5],12:i: – isolates were distributed in Lineage IA and Lineage IB-2, which all belonged to ST34 by MLST typing. Only Lineage IB-2 contained ST34 isolates from both Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-. Among the isolates of ST34, TST4 was identified as the most common CRISPR type representing 86.5% of Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- and 14.5 % of Salmonella Typhimurium mainly from pigs and humans. This study demonstrated that TST4-ST34 isolates were predominant in Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-, and pig was the main reservoir for Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- in China, which might have the potential to transmit to humans by pig production.

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (Salmonella Typhimurium) is one of the most important zoonotic pathogens causing food-borne gastroenteritis across the world [Citation1,Citation2] Human infections with Salmonella Typhimurium are typically associated with contaminated food of animal origin [Citation3]. Recently, a Salmonella Typhimurium monophasic variant (Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-) has been increasingly isolated from husbandry animals, foods, and humans [Citation4]. Among the common serovars associated with human salmonellosis cases in Europe, the monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium has ranked third after Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium in 2017 [Citation5]. In USA, the Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- was confirmed to be the most increased serotype from 1972 to 2016, and stayed as the top 5 serotype for human salmonellosis during 2011 and 2016 [Citation6]. However, few reports described the prevalence of Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- in human salmonellosis in China. In 2015, 13 foodborne isolates of Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- were firstly reported in Guangdong province. A recent study pointed out that Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- had increased to be the second most frequently encountered serotype in patients in Henan province, China [Citation7]. Comparative analysis of genome sequences and biological properties has revealed that deletion or mutation of the fljB gene causes loss of phase 2 flagellin expression in the monophasic variant [Citation8]. And the MLST type was not an efficient tool to differentiate them [Citation9]. Therefore, new efforts are needed to demonstrate the genetic and phenotypic difference between Salmonella Typhimurium and its monophasic variant with prevalence characteristics of both serotypes. It is also important to understand the phylogenetic relationship between the two serotypes in order to develop new eradication strategies.

The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) typing has been used as a high-resolution typing method of a broad range of bacteria. Thus far, CRISPR typing has been widely used to subtype Salmonella isolates belonging to identical serotypes including Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Salmonella Pullorum [Citation10–14]. Such studies have demonstrated that CRISPR typing is efficient in discriminating isolates from different sources and time periods. Further, the arrangement and microevolution of CRISPR spacers allows typing and subtyping to be performed in a single step. In the present study, we used CRISPR typing to identify genotypic relationships among 173 isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- obtained from different hosts during 2009–2017 in China. Our findings demonstrate the presence of a predominant CRISPR type shared by these two serotypes in both humans and pigs, and reveal the pig as a main reservoir for Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-, which can also infect human.

We used CRISPR typing to genotype 173 isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium (62) and its monophasic variant Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- (111) obtained from different sources during 2009–2017 in China (Supplementary Table S1). Animal-origin Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- isolates were collected from commercial farms, slaughterhouse, and retail markets, while human isolates were collected from diarrhea patients in hospitals. Identification of Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- was performed by slide agglutination with somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antiserum combined with multiplex-PCR approach of fliB-fliA intergenic region and the fljB gene, respectively [Citation8]. CRISPR typing was performed as previously described [Citation15]. Among the 173 isolates, 67 unique spacers were detected in the two CRISPR loci, with 31 in CRISPR1 and 36 in CRISPR2. Based on the spacer arrangement, 30 different alleles were observed in CRISPR1, and 16 different alleles in CRISPR2 ((A)). With the combination of CRISPR1 and CRISPR2 arrays, a total of 34 different Typhimurium CRISPR types were identified and named using a number suffix to TST as previously indicated ((A,B)). Cluster analysis using UPGMA revealed that only seven out of the 34 TSTs shared between isolates from different host. TST4, a combination of CRISPR1 allele 7 and CRISPR2 allele 6, was found to be the most frequent CRISPR type shared by 55% (96/173) of the isolates ((B)). TST4 and TST17 were common among isolates from pigs, humans and chicken, which showed the potential transmission between animals and humans. TST20, TST27, TST30, TST31, and TST33 were only detected in isolates of poultry origin and were distant from TSTs of other origins. Two isolates collected from cattle belonged to TST9. This revealed that CRISPR types also reflected the source of isolates [Citation16]. TST4 isolates were observed from six out of nine provinces demonstrating its predominant prevalence in China (Supplementary Table S1). The second most common CRISPR type TST5 was detected in three provinces with only 11 isolates. In Jiangsu province, 13 CRISPR types were detected in 38 isolates from Yangzhou city, but only 4 CRISPR types in 27 isolates from Huaian city. These findings reflected that CRISPR types were closely related to different regions.

Figure 1. The CRISPR type and phylogenic relationship of 173 Salmonella Typhimurium and its monophasic variant isolates. (A) The CRISPR type for each strain is represented by spacers arrangement in CRISPR1 (left) and CRISPR2 (right) locus. Each unique spacer is represented by a unique combination of background colour with the colour and shape of the object in the foreground. Name of the spacers are labelled on the top of each spacers. And the frequency of each allelic type is listed on the left side of the CRISPR allele. The TSTs (Typhimurium sequence types) are derived from the combination of CRISPR 1 and CRISPR alleles. (B) The minimum spanning phylogenetic tree built from the CRISPR allelic profiles of 173 Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- isolates. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of isolates in this circle and isolates in the same circle share the same CRISPR type. All TSTs are labelled and the origins of isolates are indicated with unique colours on the right side. The left side is composed of non-ST34 Salmonella Typhimrium isolates, while the right side includes only ST34 isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- isolated mainly from humans and pigs. (C) The maximum-parsimony approach was performed to reveal the genetic relationship of 34 TSTs. Two lineages and four sub-lineages clearly showed that Lineage II and IB-1 was only Salmonella Typhimurium isolates, while Lineage IA was occupied by Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-. Only Lineage IB-2 was mixed by both serotypes.

Figure 1. The CRISPR type and phylogenic relationship of 173 Salmonella Typhimurium and its monophasic variant isolates. (A) The CRISPR type for each strain is represented by spacers arrangement in CRISPR1 (left) and CRISPR2 (right) locus. Each unique spacer is represented by a unique combination of background colour with the colour and shape of the object in the foreground. Name of the spacers are labelled on the top of each spacers. And the frequency of each allelic type is listed on the left side of the CRISPR allele. The TSTs (Typhimurium sequence types) are derived from the combination of CRISPR 1 and CRISPR alleles. (B) The minimum spanning phylogenetic tree built from the CRISPR allelic profiles of 173 Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- isolates. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of isolates in this circle and isolates in the same circle share the same CRISPR type. All TSTs are labelled and the origins of isolates are indicated with unique colours on the right side. The left side is composed of non-ST34 Salmonella Typhimrium isolates, while the right side includes only ST34 isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- isolated mainly from humans and pigs. (C) The maximum-parsimony approach was performed to reveal the genetic relationship of 34 TSTs. Two lineages and four sub-lineages clearly showed that Lineage II and IB-1 was only Salmonella Typhimurium isolates, while Lineage IA was occupied by Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-. Only Lineage IB-2 was mixed by both serotypes.

Compared with MLST type of the 173 isolates, the CRISPR typing divided the 122 ST34 isolates into 14 TSTs ((A,B)), which confirmed that CRISPR typing has stronger discriminatory power than MLST [Citation17]. As shown in (B), 95 out of 96 TST4 strains shared the ST34 type, including isolates of both Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-, mostly from pigs and humans. However, all of the eight (12.9%, 8/62) TST4-ST34 Salmonella Typhimurium strains were isolated from pigs, while the 88 (79.3%, 88/111) TST4-ST34 Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- strains included 68 pig isolates, 19 human isolates, and one chicken isolate, suggesting that Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- has become more frequently transmitted to human through contaminated food than Salmonella Typhimurium. Whole genome sequencing analysis of Salmonella Typhimurium and its monophasic variant from Denmark demonstrated that ST34 was the main MLST type in the monophasic variant isolates, which was also shared by Salmonella Typhimurium isolated from humans, food, and veterinary samples [Citation9]. In the present study, we not only confirmed that ST34 is predominant among Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- isolates, but also demonstrated that TST4 is the main CRISPR type shared by both serotypes among these ST34 isolates, which were mainly from swine or pork meat ((B)). Apart from TST4-ST34, which was shared by both serotypes, TST5-ST34 and TST6-ST34 were also shared by the two serotypes isolated from both pigs and humans ((B)).

According to data reported by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Salmonella Typhimurium ranked second after Salmonella Enteritidis and followed by its monophasic variant serovar associated with human salmonellosis cases in Europe during 2017 [Citation5]. In addition, 39.4% of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates and 81.4% of its monophasic variant isolates from human cases showed multi-drug resistance (MDR), a much higher prevalence of resistance than 28.6% of all Salmonella isolates from human salmonellosis [Citation5]. Thus, Salmonella Typhimurium and its monophasic variant are considered as a serious epidemic threat to public health with apparent worldwide distribution. Thus far, although swine or pork has been considered as the main source of infection in many countries, the genetic relationship between Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- is not well understood. To identify the genetic relationship between the two serotypes, a phylogenic tree was constructed based on the 34 identified TSTs ((C)) using Bionumericus 7.5. As shown in (C), they are divided into two main lineages and four sub-lineages. Interestingly, Lineage IA was found to be composed of TSTs specific to Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- isolates, while Lineage II and IB-1 was exclusively composed of TSTs specific to Salmonella Typhimurium strains mainly of the ST19 type. Interestingly, only Lineage IB-2 contained TSTs shared by both Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-. Although there was a low number of isolates with TSTs specific to Salmonella Typhimurium or Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-, this diversity reflected evolutionary divergence among the two serotypes. Both Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- were observed in TST4, TST5 and TST6, which confirmed a close genetic relationship between these two serotypes.

In addition, CRISPR typing showed higher discriminatory power than PFGE and MLVA, and it could correctly identify all major lineages defined by whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism typing (WGST) of Salmonella Enteritidis isolates [Citation18]. However, CRISPR typing could not efficiently delineate outbreak clusters, which could be resolved by WGST in further study.

In conclusion, CRISPR typing has been widely used as a high-resolution typing method based on the fact that genetic diversity of CRISPR sequences can provide valuable insights into microevolution and evolutionary trajectories of bacterial isolates including Salmonella. In the present study, we demonstrated that TST4-ST34 strains were predominant in most Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- isolates and shared by some Salmonella Typhimurium isolates, obtained from humans, pigs, and chicken. Furthermore, the pig was found to be the main reservoir for these TST4-ST34 isolates, suggesting that the monophasic variant might be produced via mutation of Salmonella Typhimurium in pigs. The prevalence of the TST4-ST34 Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- strains in animals should be considered a matter of public health concern, and monitored by the government to prevent transmission to humans.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download ()

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 31730094]; The National Plan on Key Basic Research and Development [grant number 2017YFD0500100; 2017YFD0500700]; Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Support Program independent innovation funds [grant number CX(16)1028]; The Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD); The Yangzhou University International Academic Exchange Special Fund for Ph.D students of 2017.

References

  • Galanis E, Lo Fo Wong DM, Patrick ME, et al. Web-based surveillance and global Salmonella distribution, 2000-2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(3):381–388. doi: 10.3201/eid1205.050854
  • Hendriksen RS, Vieira AR, Karlsmose S, et al. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the world health organization global foodborne infections network country data bank: results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011;8(8):887–900. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0787
  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010. EFSA Journal. 2012;17(10):e20113.
  • Campos J, Mourao J, Peixe L, et al. Non-typhoidal Salmonella in the pig production chain: a comprehensive analysis of its impact on human health. Pathogens. 2019;8(1):e19. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8010019
  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA Journal. 2018;16(12):e5500.
  • CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). National Salmonella surveillance annual report, 2016. 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/salmonella-surveillance.html.
  • Sun HH, Wan YP, Du PC, et al. The epidemiology of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019. DOI:10.189/fdp.2019.2676.
  • Tennant SM, Diallo S, Levy H, et al. Identification by PCR of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars associated with invasive infections among febrile patients in Mali. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(3):e621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000621
  • Gymoese P, Sorensen G, Litrup E, et al. Investigation of outbreaks of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and its monophasic variants using whole-genome sequencing, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(10):1631–1639. doi: 10.3201/eid2310.161248
  • Fabre L, Zhang J, Guigon G, et al. CRISPR typing and subtyping for improved laboratory surveillance of Salmonella infections. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036995
  • Shariat N, Timme RE, Pettengill JB, et al. Characterization and evolution of Salmonella CRISPR-Cas systems. Microbiology. 2015;161(2):374–386. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000005
  • Thompson CP, Doak AN, Amirani N, et al. High-resolution identification of multiple Salmonella serovars in a single sample using CRISPR-SeroSeq. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84:e01859–18.
  • Xie XL, Hu YC, Xu YH, et al. Genetic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovar Pullorum based on characterization and evolution of CRISPR sequence. Vet Microbiol. 2017;203:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.010
  • Li QC, Wang X, Yin KQ, et al. Genetic analysis and CRISPR typing of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis from different sources revealed potential transmission from poultry and pig to human. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018;266:119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.11.025
  • Li QC, Yin KQ, Xie XL, et al. Detection and CRISPR subtyping of Salmonella spp. isolated from whole raw chickens in Yangzhou from China. Food Control. 2017;82:291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.07.008
  • Liu FY, Kariyawasam S, Jayarao BM, et al. Subtyping Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates from different sources by using sequence typing based on virulence genes and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(13):4520–4526. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00468-11
  • Ferrari RG, Panzenhagen PHN, Conte-Junior CA. Phenotypic and genotypic eligible methods for Salmonella Typhimurium source tracking. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2587. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02587
  • Deng X, Shariat N, Driebe EM, et al. Comparative analysis of subtyping methods against a whole-genome-sequencing standard for Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(1):212–218. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02332-14