Abstract
Numerous efforts have been made to examine the relationship between aggregated traffic volume and conflicts and some inconsistent findings (linear vs. non-linear) have been observed. In this study, we explore the causes of this inconsistency. It is found that traffic conflicts are very similar for all uncongested traffic states, which supports the proportional linear assumptions in many research. By contrast, the conflicts for congested traffic states are significantly higher, which results in a non-linear feature for combined traffic states.
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to the journal's Editor-in-Chief and three anonymous reviewers whose comments significantly improved the earlier version of this manuscript.
Notes
1. For simplicity, only middle-lane data were collected and used in this study.