![Sample our Social Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110822/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Social-Sciences.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
This article puts forward an interactionist discourse approach for studying the course of local political protest. We argue that how local policy-makers engage with the (anticipated) demands of citizens and mediate national policy produces distinct framing and feeling rules about potentially controversial issues. These framing and feeling rules open up or close down opportunities for citizen concerns to develop into collective action and policy change. Our contribution refines cultural approaches to social movement theory, focusing on local interactions in the formation of discourse, and allows us to better understand within-country variation in the course of contentious collective action. We develop our argument through a comparison of sixteen cases of installing mobile phone cell sites in the Netherlands. We show that the interaction between municipalities and citizens establishes a specific framing of the issue, of the role of citizens in decision-making and of the rules concerning what citizens may legitimately feel about mobile phone masts being erected in their neighbourhoods. This gives rise to four typical patterns of engagement between municipalities and citizens.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Takeo David Hymans and Gail M. Zuckerwise who edited and fine-tuned the article.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. See: http://www.telecomsnetworks.com/mno-directory, and: http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2010/06.aspx. We exclude here the Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNO).
2. The Dutch case dates back to the early 1990s and is therefore excluded here.