https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6292-6381
![Sample our Language & Literature journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5941/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Language-Literature.jpg"})
Acknowledgements
AKG was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 798971. NM was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (grant RTI2018-096311-B-I00), the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER). The authors acknowledge financial support from the “Severo Ochoa” Programme for Center/Unit of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2015-490) and by the Basque Government through the BERC 2018–2021 programme.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 Lakatos et al., Citation2019
Entrainment by inputs conveying internally generated information streams like connected memories or ‘trains of thought’ is also conceivable. While we acknowledge that the existence of this form of internal entrainment is highly speculative, there is some evidence that it does occur. (p. R892)
2 Obleser & Kayser, Citation2019
However results from clever stimulus manipulations show that entrainment can also be shaped by high-level linguistic processes and may not require such low-level acoustic regularities, a case in which the neural signal may be oscillatory but the stimulus not. (p. 922)
3 Rimmele et al., Citation2018
Temporal predictions (periodic, aperiodic) operate upon endogenous constraints by predictively aligning neuronal excitability in time to facilitate the processing of anticipated events. Top-down influences correspond to an anticipatory phase reset (originating from higher-level processes; not directly driven by low-level stimulus features) of ongoing oscillations in those neuronal subpopulations involved in the processing of the expected event (e.g. beat or syllable). (p. 875)