2,327
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The motivational bases of public service: foundations for a third wave of research

Pages 34-47 | Received 10 Dec 2013, Accepted 26 Jan 2014, Published online: 24 Mar 2014
 

Abstract

Research on public service motivation has garnered significant attention from scholars, especially in the last two decades. This article divides the evolution of the research into three waves: definition and measurement; assessing and confirming construct validity and diffusion of the construct; and learning from past research and filling shortcomings and gaps. Significant contributions and benchmarks of the first two waves are identified. Four foundational activities are discussed that are present and will be important for advancing public service motivation research during the third wave. Some aspects of the research in the Asia Pacific region are highlighted.

This article is part of the following collections:
Public Service Motivation and the Asia-Pacific Region

Notes

1. The immediate trigger for Rainey’s study was an earlier public–private comparative study by Buchanan (Citation1975), which arrived at conclusions at odds with Rainey’s view of public service.

2. The four items are: I admire people who initiate or are involved in activities to aid my community; It is important to contribute to activities that tackle social problems; Meaningful public service is very important to me; and It is important for me to contribute to the common good.

3. Combining wages and deferred compensation into a single, total compensation category helps to simplify the typology. A practice common in government has been to hold current compensation down and provide more generous deferred compensation. The global movement to control government costs, however, has begun to change compensation practices, and traditional relationships between current and deferred compensation are evolving. Whether compensation is accurately represented as a single incentive or is better represented as multiple incentives is an empirical question. It is important to bear in mind that the total compensation category is used here to simplify the typology and may need to be disaggregated based on evidence.

4. No studies have looked simultaneously at the three incentives in Table .

5. The 15 countries included in the analysis were the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Spain, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Russia, Israel, Japan, Taiwan, Australia and New Zealand.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.