557
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Addressing Anti-Fat Bias in Psychology: Education and Resistance

Pages 252-258 | Received 17 Apr 2019, Accepted 24 Apr 2019, Published online: 18 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

This is a commentary on Ward and McPhail’s (Citation2019) article “Fat Shame and Blame in Reproductive Care: Implications for Ethical Health Care Interactions.” Here I note the importance of good mental health to positive pregnancy and childbirth experiences and consider whether psychologists and other mental health professionals share medical providers’ tendencies to blame and shame their fat clients (they do). I discuss the absence of coverage of sizeism (fat prejudice) in textbooks used to train psychology graduate students, students’ and trainees’ resistance to discussions of sizeism in classes and workshops, and the importance of intersectionality and consideration of fat as a social identity. Resources for teaching and practicing fat-affirmative psychotherapy are provided.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.