Abstract
Accurate biological information about menstruation is crucial for menstrual health literacy. A diverse group of students (N = 125) at a large southwestern US university estimated—by pouring liquid into containers—the amount of menstrual blood produced during an average menstrual period. Only 14% could give a relatively accurate estimate, whereas 55% overestimated by at least 65 ml. Further, 7% gave extreme overestimations of one liter or more. Gender and race did not impact accurate knowledge, but queer/pansexual participants and women’s and gender studies or social justice majors were significantly more accurate. Implications for health education and recognizing heavy bleeding are explored.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Claire Halling, Mam Marie Sanyang, Mika Collins, John Payton, Marli Mayon, Ayanna Shambe, Alexis Starks, and the Feminist Research on Gender and Sexuality Group for their contributions to this manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).