ABSTRACT
Given the diversity of biodiversity citizen science projects' design and objectives, a major challenge is to better understand the factors influencing their successes. We study an online communication space where participants to a participative biodiversity monitoring program share their data and freely interact. A quantitative analysis of the comments' distribution among participants reveals the multiplicity of epistemic and social roles they endorse: helping collective identification of plants and insects, moderating the respect of the scientific protocol, or maintaining community's life. By building a typology of these comments, we show how this space of discussion favors exchanges and reflections about esthetical, interpersonal, biological and methodological aspects. We argue that the existence of such spaces favors all together the production of high-quality data, science learning, and individual commitment towards environmental issues. Maybe more importantly, they allow citizens to build and strengthen collective epistemic and affective relationships with science.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Spipoll participants, the Vigie-Nature team and the OPIE for giving us the opportunity to develop this study. We also thank the CESCO members and Mathieu de Flores for useful comments.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Ana-Cristina Torres
Ana-Cristina Torres is an associate professor in urban studies, working on the socio-ecological transition. She has a double formation in Biology and Sociology.
Baptiste Bedessem
Baptiste Bedessem is a biologist and philosopher of science, working on the epistemological and political aspects of public engagement in science.
Nicolas Deguines
Nicolas Desguines is an ecologist, he studies the impact of climate change on biodiversity.
Colin Fontaine
Colin Fontaine is an ecologist, specialized in species’ interactions networks.