![MathJax Logo](/templates/jsp/_style2/_tandf/pb2/images/math-jax.gif)
Abstract
We discuss a spectral asymptotics theory of an even zonal metric and a Schrödinger operator with zonal potentials on a sphere. We decompose the eigenvalue problem into a series of one-dimensional problems. We consider the individual behavior of this series of one-dimensional problems. We find certain Weyl’s type of asymptotics on the eigenvalues.
Public Interest Statement
In this paper, we describe a connection between the eigenvalue distribution theorems and the geometric characteristics for a class of manifolds: eigenvalues are frequencies. It is believed that one can figure out some of the physical characteristics of a wave-reflecting object by hitting it with a band of frequencies of testing waves. It is a research interest among many disciplines, e.g. acoustics, optics, remote sensing, medical imaging, national defense, astrophysics, and quantum mechanics. Wherever there is a wave propagating through the media, we ask if one can analyze the perturbed wave and figure out the perturbation. As asked by Mark Kac, “Can you hear the shape of a drum?”.
1. Introduction
In this paper, we compute the eigenvalue asymptotics of the operator with a metric g that satisfies the following even zonal metric assumption: Let
be the standard coordinate on
. We consider the hypersurface defined by the equation
(1)
(1)
in which we assume r is an even function of z, and
for
. Following the framework of Carlson (Citation1997), we let s(z) denote the arc length
(2)
(2)
in which we set . Hence, a metric is induced on the hypersurface. Now, we calculate
using the method provided in Shubin (Citation1987, p. 157), and then we deduce that
(3)
(3)
in which S is the N sphere. We put the operator in the Liouville form with respect to the variable s:(4)
(4)
where we observe that the function is again an even function about the midpoint of [0, L]. For the standard
sphere, we note that
. Accordingly, we are required to assume that
and for some
, we have the following properties:
(5)
(5)
Here,(1.5) is to assure the hypersurface behaves like sphere near
. Then, for
,
, and from which we deduce that
(6)
(6)
Accordingly,(7)
(7)
The function ,
depends on
and its derivatives.
Let be the eigenvalues of
. Then, the eigenvalue problem (Equation4
(4)
(4) ) is reduced to be
(8)
(8)
For a Schrödinger operator with a zonal potential, we are dealing with an equation in the following form:(9)
(9)
where is assumed to be an even function with midpoint L / 2, and
. We say p(s) is zonal because p is a function of z as in the hypersurfaces(1.1) and (1.2) (Gurarie, Citation1988,Citation1990). A potential of this type has various applications in mathematical physics. We refer more introduction on potentials of this class to (Gurarie, Citation1990, p. 567). The differential equations (1.8) and (1.9) require the following regularization conditions:
(10)
(10)
Moreover, (1.6) and (1.7) imply that(11)
(11)
in which r(s) is even, by its construction and its solution satisfies the initial condition
. Theorem 1.4 in Carlson (Citation1993) says that p(s) is uniquely determined by the spectral data of
. According to (1.8) and (1.9), we set that
(12)
(12)
Now, we are studying the eigenvalue asymptotics of the equation of the following form:(13)
(13)
in which the asymptotic expansion of y(s; z) is analyzed in Carlson (Citation1993,Citation1997,Citation1994). Setting the solution , y(s; z) is an entire function of exponential type (Carlson, Citation1993; Pöschel & Trubowitz, Citation1987). The union of all eigenvalues of (1.14) over
gives the collection of the total eigenvalues of
in (1.4) and vice versa. The cluster structure of the eigenvalues for each
is known among the work in Gurarie (Citation1988,Citation1990) and many others. Most important of all (Carlson, Citation1993, p. 23), due to the evenness assumption on
and
, the eigenvalues of (1.14) is split into two kinds for each
: the zeros of y(L / 2; z) and
. The zeros of y(L / 2; z) and of
correspond to the Dirichlet and Neumann spectral data of (1.14) at
, respectively. Hence, in the first part of this paper, we collect all zeros of y(L / 2; z) and
for each
.
In this paper, we consider the Weyl’s type of eigenvalue asymptotics of (1.8) and (1.9) on surfaces of type (1.4).
Theorem 1.1
Let N(v) be the eigenvalue counting function in an interval of length v starting at the origin. Then, the following asymptotics holds:(14)
(14)
A Weyl’s theorem of this kind is classic in many perturbations (Chen, Citation2015a; Gurarie, Citation1988,Citation1990; Shubin, Citation1987). We provide an extra information on the arc length L. The new ingredient in this paper is an analysis in entire function theory and its extension to non-even metrics.
2. Zeros of y(L / 2; z) and ![](//:0)
![](//:0)
We apply the entire function in complex analysis (Koosis, Citation1997; Levin, Citation1972,Citation1996) to study the distribution of its zeros.
Definition 2.1
Let f(z) be an entire function. Let . An entire function of f(z) is said to be a function of finite order if there exists a positive constant k, such that the inequality
(15)
(15)
is valid for all sufficiently large values of r. The greatest lower bound of such numbers k is called the order of the entire function f(z). By the type of an entire function f(z) of order
, we mean the greatest lower bound of positive number A for which asymptotically we have
(16)
(16)
That is,(17)
(17)
If , then we say f(z) is of normal type or mean type.
We note that(18)
(18)
where we mean the first inequality holds for some sequence going to infinity and the second one holds asymptotically.
Definition 2.2
If an entire function f(z) is of order one and of normal type, then we say it is an entire function of exponential type .
Lemma 2.3
Let f and g be two entire functions. Then, the following two inequalities hold.(19)
(19)
where if the indicator of the two summands is not equal at some , then the equality holds in (2.6).
The equality in (2.5) holds if one function is of completely regular growth. This is classic and we refer these to Levin (Citation1972, p. 51, 159).
Definition 2.4
Let f(z) be an integral function of finite order in the angle
. We call the following quantity the indicator of the function f(z).
(20)
(20)
Definition 2.5
The following quantity is called the width of the indicator diagram of the entire function f:(21)
(21)
The order and the type of an integral function in an angle can be defined similarly. The connection between the indicator and its type
is specified by the following theorem.
Definition 2.6
Let f(z) be an entire function of order . We use
to denote the number of the zeros of f(z) inside
and
; we define the density function
(22)
(22)
and(23)
(23)
with fixed , with E as an at most countable set.
The two definitions above are necessary vocabularies to apply Cartwright–Levinson theory (Levin, Citation1972, p. 251) in complex analysis.
Lemma 2.7
(Levin, Citation1972, p. 72) The maximal value of the indicator of the function f(z) on the interval
is equal to the type
of this function inside the angle
.
Lemma 2.8
(Levin, Citation1972) Let and
be real constants.
(24)
(24)
Let y(s; z) be the solution of the following problem in Carlson (Citation1997):(25)
(25)
For the initial conditions, we actually have(26)
(26)
The following result is well known for the classic case (Pöschel & Trubowitz, Citation1987, p. 14) and for singular potentials without a lower bound (Faddeev, Citation1960, (14.14),(14.15)). However, we give the more precise first-order asymptotics from a point of view from Carlson (Citation1993,Citation1997).
Proposition 2.9
y(L / 2; z) and are entire functions of exponential type L / 2.
Firstly, we apply the estimates in Carlson (Citation1993,Citation1997,Citation1994).(27)
(27)
so we have(28)
(28)
The classic result (Pöschel & Trubowitz, Citation1987, p. 27) shows that there exists a constant depending on the distance to the zeros of
, such that the following inequality holds away from the zeros of
:
(29)
(29)
Hence,(30)
(30)
Thus, the indicator function of y(s; z) is(31)
(31)
Because y(s; z) is entire in z for a fixed s, is a continuous function of
(Levin, Citation1972). Thus,
(32)
(32)
Lemma 2.7 implies that y(s; z) is an entire function of exponential type s. A similar argument holds for . That is,
(33)
(33)
(34)
(34)
This proves the lemma setting .
Lemma 2.10
Let be the zeros of y(s; z) and
be the zeros of
. Then,
(35)
(35)
This is a direct consequence of Rouché’s theorem on the boundary of a suitable sequence of neighborhoods containing the zeros of or
under the estimates (2.9) and (2.12), respectively, by considering the following inequality:
(36)
(36)
We refer the detailed proof to Carlson (Citation1993,Citation1997), Chen (Citation2015a,Citation2015b), Pöschel and Trubowitz (Citation1987). Therefore, there is an asymptotically uniform structure of eigenvalues of (1.3) for each
-eigenvalue. The first term in the asymptotics is independent of p(s). They overlay asymptotically periodically from one
to another to give each cluster of eigenvalues of (1.3). Let
be denoted as the counting function for eigenvalues in interval [0, v] for each
-eigenvalues. We refer the structure of the eigenvalues of a zonal eigenvalues to (Gurarie, Citation1990, p. 576). We collect two kinds of spectra for each
by applying Lemmas 2.10 and (2.9):
(37)
(37)
The locations of of N-sphere are well known in Gurarie (Citation1988) and Shubin (Citation1987):
(38)
(38)
with increasing multiplicity . Given an interval of length v starting at the origin, we have the quantity of
(39)
(39)
of eigenvalues of (Shubin, Citation1987, p. 165). Hence,
(40)
(40)
This proves Theorem 1.1.
3. Non-even zonal potentials
Now, we drop the assumption that r and p are even functions in s in Theorem 1.1. We note that (1.7), (1.8), and (1.9) hold in [0, L]. Accordingly, we are considering a Schrödinger operator with a zonal potential p(s); we are dealing with the equation(41)
(41)
where ,
,
for
and
. Without the symmetry at
, we do not consider the zeros of y(L / 2; z) and of
any more. After the linearization near
in (1.5) in Section 1, we consider a differential equation of the following form similar to (1.13) and (1.14).
(42)
(42)
whose solutions are spanned by the Jost solutions Faddeev (Citation1960, (14.11)) and Reed and Simon (Citation1979, p. 140), which satisfy the following integral equation
(43)
(43)
in which is defined as in (Faddeev, Citation1960, (14.12)). Thus,
(44)
(44)
whenever s is beyond the support of the perturbation. In our case, [0, L]; is the spherical Bessel function of second kind. Therefore, we write
as
(45)
(45)
In general, we recall the scattering formula in Faddeev (Citation1960, (14.17)) for :
(46)
(46)
where gives the scattering matrix to equation (3.2). For any z that solves (3.6) is an eigenvalue of (3.2). Most important of all, the M-function
and
are independent of l (Faddeev, Citation1960, Theorem 14.1). The proof is given in Faddeev (Citation1960, p. 90) and carries to continuous l. Moreover,
can be meromorphically extended from the upper half plane to the complex z-plane or
-plane without poles on the real axis except for the origin (Melrose, Citation1995, p. 16) depending on dimension parity. For our case, the dimension is one. Therefore,
and
can be defined in
(47)
(47)
For some extension and uniqueness theory of M(z), we refer to Faddeev (Citation1960, p. 42). Furthermore, the constants and
are independent of the space variable s and can be solved by the scattering theory in half line Aktosun, Gintides, and Papanicolaou (Citation2013, p. 13) and Freiling and Yurko (Citation2001) as follows:
(48)
(48)
Evaluating (3.7) at , (2.13) implies that
(49)
(49)
Evaluating (3.7) at , we have
(50)
(50)
Only the case is solvable which is found in Aktosun et al. (Citation2013, p. 13). Equations (3.9) and (3.10) imply that
(51)
(51)
in which . Therefore, the eigenvalues of (Equation14
(14)
(14) ) are z-solutions to the equation (3.12). This is a compatibility condition. From complex analysis, we have a zero distribution theory for the exponential polynomials in the form of (3.12) (Koosis, Citation1997; Levin, Citation1972,Citation1996).
In general, by referring to Faddeev (Citation1960, Lemma 1.5),(52)
(52)
uniformly for any . However, we need the behavior of
slightly below the real axis (see Figure ).
We recall the well-known integral equation (Faddeev, Citation1960, p. 38):(53)
(53)
where A(0, t) is compactly supported for our potential p(s). We refer the construction of A(0, t) to Faddeev (Citation1960, p. 30). Thus, we observe that(54)
(54)
to which we apply the Riemann–Lebesgue Lemma. Hence, the integral vanishes for large |k|.(55)
(55)
Moreover, are the exponential functions of type L by applying (2.4). We also infer from (2.14) and the complex analysis in section 2 that the right-hand side of (3.12) is an analytic function of order one and at most of type L.
Because for any l, we take
for any l (Faddeev, Citation1960, Theorem 14.1). By (3.6) and (3.12), it suffices to study the zeros of the following analytic function
(56)
(56)
wherein (2.6) suggests that (3.17) is an analytic function of type at most L in . We need a lower bound. We use (2.17) to describe the asymptotic behaviors of the solution
. More specifically, we apply Prof. Carlson’s result (Citation1997, Lemma 2.4, Lemma 3.2).
(57)
(57)
to which we use (2.16) again with (3.16) and deduce that(58)
(58)
Hence, we apply Rouche’s theorem in a strip of width less than containing
in the interior in Figure 1. There are only finitely many zeros outside this strip when examined (3.19) by Rouche’s theorem. Let
be the eigenvalue counting function inside the strip
for some
for each
-eigenvalue. Rouche’s theorem also suggests that the zeros of F(z) asymptotically periodically approach to the ones of
with the eigenvalue density described by Lemma 2.10. Then,
(59)
(59)
Previously, we have obtained this in (2.25) for even metrics. We repeat the same argument using (2.26), (2.27), and (2.28). Thus, (1.15) follows again for the asymptotics for non-even metrics.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Lung-Hui Chen
The author grew up in Taiwan, and received his PhD in mathematics at Purdue University, 2007. He held a postdoctoral position at National Taiwan University in 2008. Currently, he is teaching at National Chung-Cheng University in Chia-Yi. The author’s research interests are scattering theory and spectral analysis of differential operators. Recently, he has been involved with the inverse problems concerning wave propagation. It sounds a bit cliched, but when he is not with math, he’s with his family and wine tasting. He is an audiophile, and has collected a few thousands of music CDs across all genres.
References
- Aktosun, T., Gintides, D., & Papanicolaou, V. G. (2013). Reconstruction of the wave speed from transmission eigenvalues for the spherically symmetric variable-speed wave equation. Inverse Problems, 29(6), 065007.
- Carlson, R. (1993). Inverse spectral theory for some singular Sturm--Liouville problems. Journal of Differential Equations, 106, 121–140.
- Carlson, R. (1997). A Borg--Levinson theorem for Bessel operators. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 177(1), 1–26.
- Carlson, R. (1994). Inverse Sturm--Liouville problems with a singularity at zero. Inverse Problems, 10, 851–864.
- Chen, L-H. (2015a). An uniqueness result with some density theorems with interior transmission eigenvalues. Applicable Analysis. doi:10.1080/00036811.2014.936403
- Chen, L.-H. (2015b). A uniqueness theorem on the eigenvalues of spherically symmetric interior transmission problem in absorbing medium. Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations, 60, 145–167.
- Faddeev, L. D. (1960). The quantum theory of scattering ( Research report, No. Em-165). New York: Institute of Mathematical Science, Division of Mathematical Research, New York University.
- Freiling, G., & Yurko, V. (2001). Inverse Sturm--Liouville problems and their applications. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
- Gurarie, D. (1988). Inverse spectral problem for the 2-sphere Schroedinger operators with zonal potentials. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 16, 313–323.
- Gurarie, D. (1990). Zonal Schroedinger operator on the n-sphere inverse spectral problem and rigidity. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 131, 571–603.
- Koosis, P. (1997). The logarithmic integral I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Levin, B. J. (1972). Distribution of zeros of entire functions (Revised ed., Translations of Mathematical Monographs). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
- Levin, B. J. (1996). Lectures on entire functions (Translation of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 150). Providence, RI: AMS.
- Melrose, R. B. (1995). Geometric scattering theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Pöschel, J., & Trubowitz, E. (1987). Inverse spectral theory. Orlando: Academic Press.
- Reed, M., & Simon, B. (1979). Methods of modern mathematical physics, Vol. 3. London: Academic Press.
- Shubin, M. A. (1987). Pseudodifferential operators and spectral theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.