478
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A new class of Laguerre-based Apostol type polynomials

, & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1243839 | Received 01 Apr 2016, Accepted 27 Sep 2016, Published online: 24 Oct 2016

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a generating function for a new generalization of Laguerre-based Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials, Apostol-Euler and Apostol-Genocchi polynomials. By making use of the generating function method and some functional equations mentioned in the paper, we conduct a further investigation in order to obtain symmetric identities of these polynomials.

AMS subject classifications:

Public Interest Statement

In the paper, we have established the generating functions for the Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials and Laguerre-based Apostol-type Hermite polynomials by making use of Tricomi function of the generating function for Laguerre polynomials. The equivalent forms of these generating functions can be derived by using Equations. (1.1), (1.6), and (2.1). They can be viewed as the equivalent forms of the generating functions (2.3), (2.6), and (2.8), respectively. In the previous sections, we have used the concepts and the formalism associated with Laguerre polynomials to introduce the Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials and Laguerre-based Apostol-type Hermite polynomials and establish their properties. The approach presented here is general and we have established the summation rules, which can be used to derive the results for Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials from the results of the corresponding Appell polynomials.

1. Introduction

Throughout the paper, we make use of the following notations:N:=1,2,3,,N0:=0,1,2,3,=N0

andZ-:=-1,-2,-3,=Z0-\0.

Here, as convention, Z denotes the set of integers, R denotes the set of real numbers and C denotes the set of complex numbers.

The generating function of Laguerre polynomials are defined by means of the generating function (Srivastava & Manocha, Citation1984):(1.1) 11-texp-xt1-t=n=0Ln(x)tn|t|<1(1.1)

or equivalently by(1.2) expytJ02x=n=0ynLnxytn(1.2)

where J02x are called 0th order Bessel function, and nth order Bessel function Jn(x) are given by the series:(1.3) xn2Jn2x=r=0(-1)rxrr!(n+r)!nN0.(1.3)

We recall that the Gould-Hopper generalized Hermite polynomials are defined asgnm(x,y)=n!r=0nmxn-mryrr!n-mr!

where m is positive integer (see Srivastava & Manocha, Citation1984). These polynomials are specified by the generating function

expxt+ytm=gnm(x,y)tnn! (see Srivastava & Manocha, Citation1984).

In particular, we note thatgn2(x,y)=Hn(x,y)

where Hn(x,y) are called 2-variable Hermite-Kampé de Fériet polynomials (Srivastava & Manocha, Citation1984) that can be defined by the generating function:(1.4) expxt+yt2=n=0Hn(x,y)tnn!(1.4)

and it reduces to the ordinary Hermite polynomials Hn(x) (see Srivastava & Manocha, Citation1984) when we take the values y=-1 and 2x instead of x in the Equation (1.4). Furthermore, we recall that the 3-variable Laguerre-Hermite polynomials (3VLHP) LHn(x,y,z) are defined by the series (Kurt, Citation2010)(1.5) LHn(x,y,z)=n!k=0[n/2]zkyn-2kLn-2kxyk!(n-2k)!.(1.5)

The generating function of the Equation (1.5) is that(1.6) 11-ztexp-xt1-zt+yt21-zt2=n=0LHn(x,y,z)tn(1.6)

and it also equals to(1.7) exp(yt+zt2)J02xt=n=0LHn(x,y,z)tnn!.(1.7)

At the value z=-12 in the Equation (1.7), we haveLHnx,y,-12=LHn(x,y)

andLHn(x,1,-1)=LHn(x)

where LHn(x,y) denotes 2-variable Laguerre-Hermite polynomials (2VLHP) (Magnus, Oberhettinger, & Soni, Citation1966) and LHn(x) denotes the Laguerre-Hermite polynomials (LHP) (Ozarslan, Citation2013).

The generalized Bernoulli polynomials Bn(α)(x), generalized Euler polynomials En(α)(x) and the generalized Genocchi polynomials Gn(α)(x) of (non-negative integer) order α are defined, respectively, by the following generating functions (see Luo, Citation2006,Citation2011; Luo & Srivastava, Citation2005,Citation2006,Citation2011a,Citation2011b):(1.8) tet-1αext=n=0Bn(α)(x)tnn!,(|t|<2π;1α:=1)(1.8) (1.9) 2et+1αext=n=0En(α)(x)tnn!,(|t|<π;1α:=1)(1.9) (1.10) 2tet+1αext=n=0Gn(α)(x)tnn!,(|t|<π;1α:=1)(1.10)

The literature contains a large number of interesting properties and relationships involving these polynomials (Araci, Bagdasaryan, & Srivastava, Citation2014; Araci, Şen, Acikgoz, & Orucoglu Citation2015; Comtet, Citation1974; Khan, Al Saad, & Khan, Citation2001; Kurt, Citation2010; Luke, Citation1969; Luo, Citation2006,Citation2011; Luo & Srivastava, Citation2005,Citation2006,Citation2011a,Citation2011b; Magnus, Oberhettinger, & Soni, Citation1966; Ozarslan, Citation2011,Citation2013; Ozden, Citation2010,Citation2011; Ozden, Simsek, & Srivastava, Citation2010; Pathan, Citation2012; Pathan & Khan, Citation2011; Kilbas, Srivastava, & Trujillo, Citation2006; Srivastava & Manocha, Citation1984; Srivastava, Citation2014; Srivastava, Kurt, & Simsek, Citation2012; Srivastava, Garg, & Choudhary, Citation2011; ; Tuenter, 2001 ). Luo and Srivastava (Citation2005,Citation2006,Citation2011b) introduced the generalized Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials Bn(α)(x) of order α. Luo (Citation2006) also investigated the generalized Apostol-Euler polynomials En(α)(x) and the generalized Apostol-Genocchi polynomials Gn(α)(x) of (non-negative integer) order α (see also Luo, Citation2006,Citation2011a; Luo & Srivastava, Citation2011).

Let α be a non-negative integer. The generalized Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials Bn(α)(x;λ) of order α, the generalized Apostol-Euler polynomials En(α)(x;λ) of order α, the generalized Apostol-Genocchi polynomials Gn(α)(x;λ) of order α are defined, respectively, by the following generating functions (see Luo & Srivastava, Citation2011b)(1.11) tλet-1αext=n=0Bn(α)(x;λ)tnn!,(|t|<2πwhenλ=1;|t|<logλwhenλ1)(1.11) (1.12) 2λet+1αext=n=0En(α)(x;λ)tnn!,(|t|<log-λ)(1.12)

and(1.13) 2tλet+1αext=n=0Gn(α)(x;λ)tnn!,(t<log-λ).(1.13)

It can be easily noted thatBn(α)(x)=Bn(α)(x;1),En(α)(x)=En(α)(x;1)andGn(α)(x)=Gn(α)(x;1).

Recently, Kurt (Citation2010) gave the following generalization of the Bernoulli polynomials of order α, which is recalled in Definition 1.

Definition 1

For arbitrary real or complex parameter α, the generalized Bernoulli polynomials Bn[α,m-1](x)mN are defined in centered at t=0 by means of the generating function:(1.14) tmet-h=0m-1thh!αext=n=0Bn[α,m-1](x)tnn!.(1.14)

Clearly, if we take m=1 in (1.14), then the definition (1.14) becomes the definition (1.13).

More recently, Tremblay, Gaboury, and Fugère (Citation2011) further gave the following generalization of Kurt’s definition (1.14) in the following form.

Definition 2

For arbitrary real or complex parameter λ and α and the natural numbers mN, the generalized Bernoulli polynomials Bn[α,m-1](x;λ) are defined in, centered at t=0, with t<logλ, by means of the generating function:(1.15) tmλet-h=0m-1thh!αext=n=0Bn[α,m-1](x;λ)tnn!.(1.15)

Clearly, if we take m=1 in (1.15), then the definition (1.15) becomes the definition (1.11).

We now give the following definition for the generalized Euler polynomials En(α)(x).

Definition 3

For arbitrary real or complex parameter α and natural number mN, the generalized Euler polynomials En[α,m-1](x) are defined in centered at t=0, with t<π, by means of the generating function:(1.16) 2met+h=0m-1thh!αext=n=0En[α,m-1](x)tnn!.(1.16)

Obviously, setting m=1 in (16), we have En[α,0](x;1)=En(α)(x).

Definition 4

For arbitrary real or complex parameter λ and α and the natural number m, the generalized Euler polynomials En[α,m-1](x) are defined in centered at t=0, with t<log-λ, by means of the generating function:(1.17) 2mλet+h=0m-1thh!αext=n=0En[α,m-1](x;λ)tnn!.(1.17)

It is easy to see that setting m=1 in (1.17), we have En[α,0](x;λ)=En(α)(x;λ). From (1.17) we have(1.18) E0[α,m-1](x;λ)=2mλ+1α.(1.18)

Definition 5

For arbitrary real or complex parameter α and natural number mN, the generalized Genocchi polynomials Gn[α,m-1](x) are defined in centered at t=0, with t<π, by means of the generating function:(1.19) 2mtmet+h=0m-1thh!αext=n=0Gn[α,m-1](x)tnn!.(1.19)

Obviously, setting m=1 in (1.19), we have Gn[α,0](x;1)=Gn(α)(x).

Definition 6

For arbitrary real or complex parameter λ and α, and the natural number m, the generalized Genocchi polynomials Gn[α,m-1](x) are defined in centered at t=0, with t<log-λ, by means of the generating function(1.20) 2mtmλet+h=0m-1thh!αext=n=0Gn[α,m-1](x;λ)tnn!.(1.20)

It is easy to see that setting m=1 in (1.20), we have Gn[α,0](x;λ)=Gn(α)(x;λ).

In this paper, we introduce a new class of generalized Apostol-type polynomials, a countable set of polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b) generalizing Apostol-type Laguerre-Bernoulli, Apostol-type Laguerre-Euler and Apostol-type Laguerre-Genocchi polynomials and Laguerre polynomials of 2-variables Ln(x,y) specified by the generating relation (1.2) and Mittag-Leffler function.

In this paper, we develop some elementary properties and derive the implicit summation formulae for these generalized polynomials by using different analytical means on their respective generating functions.

2. A new class of Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials

Recently, Ozden (Citation2010,Citation2011), Ozden, Simsek, and Srivastava (Citation2010) and Ozarslan (Citation2011,Citation2013) introduced the unification of the Apostol-type polynomials including Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials Yn,β(α)(x;k,a,b) of higher order α which are defined by(2.1) 21-ktkβbet-abαext=n=0Yn,β(α)(x;k,a,b)tnn!t+blogβa<2π,xR;1α:=1;kN0;a,bR\{0};α,βC.(2.1)

Ozarslan (Citation2011) gave the following precise conditions of convergence of the series involved in (2.1):

(i)

if ab>0 and kN, then t+blogβa<2π,xR;1α:=1;α,βC

(ii)

if ab>0 and k=0, then 0<Imt+blogβa<2π,xR;1α:=1;α,βC

(iii)

if ab<0 and kN0, then t+blogβa<π,xR;1α:=1;α,βC

Definition 7

The generalized Laguerre-based Apostol-type Bernoulli, Laguerre-based Apostol-type Euler and Laguerre-based Apostol-type Genocchi polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b), m1 for a real or complex parameter α defined in a suitable neighborhood of t=0 by means of the following generating function(2.2) 21-ktkβbet-abh=0m-1thh!αexp(yt)J02xt=n=0LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b)tnn!(2.2)

so thatLYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b)=r=0nnrYn-r,β(α,m)(k,a,b)yrLrxy.

For x=0 in Equation (2.2), the result reduces to known result of Ozden (Citation2010,Citation2011) and Ozden et al. (Citation2010).

For k=a=b=1 and β=λ in (2.2), we state the following definition.

Definition 8

Let α and λ be arbitrary real or complex parameters. The generalized Laguerre Apostol-type Bernoulli polynomials are defined by(2.3) tλet-h=0m-1thh!αexp(yt)J02xt=n=0LBn[α,m-1](x,y;λ)tnn!.(2.3)

At the value m=1 in the Equation (2.3), the result reduces to the known result of Khan et al. (Citation2001):(2.4) tλet-1αexp(yt)J02xt=n=0LBn(α)(x,y;λ)tnn!(t<2πwhenλ=1;t<log(-λ)whenλ1.(2.4)

Setting k+1=-a=b=1 and β=λ in (2.2), we define the following.

Definition 9

Let α and λ be arbitrary real or complex parameters. The generalized Laguerre Apostol-type Euler polynomials are defined by(2.5) 2λet+h=0m-1thh!αexp(yt)J02xt=n=0LEn[α,m-1](x,y;λ)tnn!.(2.5)

For x=0 in the Equation (2.6), Further taking m=1, the result reduces to the known result of Khan et al. (Citation2001):(2.6) 2λet+1αexp(yt)J02xt=n=0LEn(α)(x,y;λ)tnn!(t<π,whenλ=1;t<log(-λ),whenλ1).(2.6)

Setting k+1=-2a=b=1 and 2β=λ in (2.2), we define the following.

Definition 10

Let α and λ be arbitrary real or complex parameters. The generalized Laguerre Apostol-type Genocchi polynomials are introduced by(2.7) 2tλet+h=0m-1thh!αexp(yt)J02xt=n=0LGn[α,m-1](x,y;λ)tnn!.(2.7)

For x=0 in Equation (2.6), Further taking α,m,λ=1, the result reduces to the known result of Khan et al. (Citation2001):(2.8) 2tλet+1exp(yt)J02xt=n=0LGn(x,y;λ)tnn!(t<π,whenλ=1;t<log(-λ),whenλ1).(2.8)

Definition 11

The generalized Laguerre-based Apostol-type Hermite-Bernoulli, Laguerre-based Apostol-type Hermite-Euler and Laguerre-based Apostol-type Hermite-Genocchi polynomials Lϕn(x,y,z), for a real or complex parameter α defined in a suitable neighborhood of t=0 by means of the following generating function:(2.9) 21-ktkβbet-abh=0m-1thh!αeyt+zt2J02xt=n=0Lϕn(x,y,z)tnn!(2.9)

where ϕn(x,y,z)=HYn,β(α,m)(x,y,z;k,a,b) contain as its special cases both generalized Apostol-type polynomials (2.1), Yn,β(α,m)(x;k,a,b) , (1.15) to (1.20) and Kampé de Fériet generalization of the Hermite polynomials Hn(x,y) (cf. Equation (1.4)).

By substituting x=y=z=0 in (2.9), we obtain the corresponding unification of the generalized Apostol-type Bernoulli, Apostol-type Euler and Apostol-type Genocchi numbers Yn,β(α,m)(k,a,b)m1 are defined for a real or complex parameter α by means of the generating function(2.10) 21-ktkβbet-abh=0m-1thh!α=n=0Yn,β(α,m)(k,a,b)tnn!.(2.10)

Then by (2.9) and (1.7), we have the representationLϕn(x,y,z;k,a,b)=r=0nnrYn-r,β(α,m)(k,a,b)LHr(x,y,z).

For α=0, in Equation (2.9), the result reduces to Equation (1.7).

Setting x=0, m=1 and replacing y by x and z by y, respectively, in (2.9), we get a recent result of Pathan and Khan (Citation2011). For k=β=a=b=1, x=0 and replacing y by x and z by y, respectively, in (2.9), the result reduces to the known result of Pathan and Khan (Citation2011). Further if α=1 the result reduces to known result of Pathan (Citation2012]:(2.11) tet-1ext+yt2=n=0HBn(x,y)tnn!.(2.11)

Besides by (2.10), we can also obtain the generalized Hermite-Euler polynomials En(α)(x,y) and the generalized Hermite-Genocchi polynomials Gn(α)(x,y) each of order α and degree n, respectively, defined by the following generating functions(2.12) 2et+1αext+yt2=n=0HEn(α)(x,y)tnn!(|t|<π;1α=1)(2.12)

and(2.13) 2tet+1αext+yt2=n=0HGn(α)(x,y)tnn!(|t|<π;1α=1).(2.13)

It may be seen that for y=0, (2.11) to (2.13) are, respectively, the generalizations of (1.8) to (1.10).

We continue with another basic example of (2.9) by taking m,k=2 and α=1. Thus we have2-1t2βbet-ab(1+t)n=0LHn(x,y,z)tnn!=n=0LΦn(x,y,z)tnn!

where Φn(x,y)=HYn,β(1,2)(x,y,z;2,a,b). We have2-1n=0LHn(x,y,z)tnn!=βbp=0tpp!n=0LΦn(x,y,z)tn-2n!-abn=0LΦn(x,y,z)tn-2n!-abn=0LΦn(x,y,z)tn-1n!.

Replace n by n-p+2, pn-212LHn(x,y,z)n!=βbp=0n-2LΦn-p+2(x,y,z)p!(n-p+2)!-abLΦn+2(x,y,z)(n+2)!-LΦn+1(x,y)(n+1)!.

This formula gives a representation of LHn(x,y,z) in terms of sums of Φ. This is the key to the next conclusion for finding another representation of LHn(x,y,z) in terms of sums of Ψ where Ψn(x,y,z)=HYn,β(1,1)(x,y,z;1,a,b). For this taking α=m=k=1 in (2.9), we havetβbet-abeyt+zt2J02xt=n=0LΨn(x,y,z)tnn!n=0LHn(x,y,z)tnn!=1tβbet-abn=0LΨn(x,y,z)tnn!

Comparing the coefficients of tn, we haveLHn(x,y,z)n!=βbp=0n+1LΨn-p+1(x,y,z)p!(n-p+1)!-abLΨn+1(x,y,z)(n+1)!.

When investigating the connection between Hermite polynomials LHn(x,y,z) and generalized Apostol-type polynomials Lϕn(x,y,z), the following theorem is of great importance.

Theorem 1

The following holds trueLHn(x,y)=n!21-k(n+k)![βLbϕn+k(x,y+1,z;k,a,b)-aLbϕn+k(x,y,z;k,a,b)]

where ϕn(x,y,z)=HYn+k,β(1,1)(x,y,z;k,a,b).

Proof

We begin with the Definition 11 and writeeyt+zt2J02xt=121-ktk21-ktkβbet-ab(βbet-ab)eyt+zt2J0(2xt)=121-ktk21-ktkβbet-abβbe(y+1)t+zt2J0(2xt)-21-ktkβbet-ababeyt+zt2J0(2xt).

Then using the definition of Kampé de Fériet generalization of the Laguerre-Hermite polynomials LHn(x,y) and (2.9), we haven=0LHn(x,y,z)tnn!=n=0n!21-k(n+k)![βLbϕn+k(x,y+1,z;k,a,b)-aLbϕn+k(x,y,z;k,a,b)]tnn!.

Finally, comparing the coefficients of tn, we complete the proof of the theorem.

For m=k=1 in Theorem 1 yields the following result for LHn(x,y,z).

Corollary 1

The following formula holds:LHn(x,y,z)=1(n+1)[βLbΨn+1(x,y+1,z;1,a,b)-aLbΨn+1(x,y,z;1,a,b)]

where Ψn(x,y,z)=HYn,β(1,1)(x,y;1,a,b) .

Theorem 2

The following formula involving Laguerre-Apostol-type polynomials LYn(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b) holds true:LYn,β(α+γ,m)(x,y+z;k,a,b)=r=0nnrYn-r(α,m)(y;k,a,b)LYr(γ,m)(x,z;k,a,b).

Proof

By Definition 7, we easily get the proof of the theorem. So we omit it.

Theorem 3

The following formula involving Laguerre-Apostol-type polynomials LYn(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b) holds true:LYn(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b)=r=0nYn-r,β(α-1,m)(k,a,b)LYr,β(m)(x,y;k,a,b).

Proof

The proof of this theorem follows from Definition 7. So we omit the proof.

3. Implicit formulae involving Laguerre-based Apostol-Type polynomials

This section is devoted to employing the definition of the Laguere-based Apostol-type polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b). First we prove the following results involving Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b).

Theorem 4

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b) holds true:LYq+l,β(α,m)(x,z;k,a,b)=n=0qp=0lqnlp(z-y)Ln+pYq+l-p-n,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b).

Proof

We replace t by t+u and rewrite the generating function (2.2) as21-k(t+u)kβbet+u-abh=0m-1(t+u)hh!αJ0(2x(t+u))=e-y(t+u)q,l=0LYq+l,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b)tqq!ull!.

Replacing y by z in the above equation and equating the resulting equation to the above equation, we gete(z-y)(t+u)q,l=0Lϕq+l,β(x,y;k,a,b)tqq!ull!=q,l=0LYq+l,β(α,m)(x,z;k,a,b)tqq!ull!.

On expanding the exponential function in the above givesN=0[(z-y)(t+u)]NN!q,l=0LYq+l,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b)tqq!ull!=q,l=0LYq+l,β(α,m)(x,z;k,a,b)tqq!ull!

which, on using series manipulation formulaN=0f(N)(x+y)NN!=n,m=0f(n+m)xnn!ymm!

in the left-hand side, becomes(3.1) n,p=0(z-y)n+ptnupn!p!q,l=0LYq+l,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b)tqq!ull!=q,l=0LYq+l,β(α,m)(x,z;k,a,b)tqq!ull!.(3.1)

Now replacing q by q-n, l by l-p and using the lemma (Srivastava & Manocha, bib36) in the left-hand side of (3.1), we getq,l=0n,p=0q,l(z-y)n+pn!p!LYq+l-n-p,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b)tq(q-n)!ul(l-p)!=q,l=0LYq+l,β(α,m)(x,z;k,a,b)tqq!ull!.

Finally on equating the coefficients of the like powers of tq and ul in the above equation, we get the required result.

For k=a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 4, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 2

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Bernoulli polynomials LBn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LBq+l[α,m-1](x,z;λ)=n=0qp=0lqnlp(z-y)Ln+pBq+l-p-n[α,m-1](x,y;λ).

For k+1=-a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 4, we get the corollary.

Corollary 3

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Euler polynomials LEn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LEq+l(α,m)(x,z;λ)=n=0qp=0lqnlp(z-y)Ln+pEq+l-p-n[α,m-1](x,y;λ).

Letting k=-2a=b=1 and 2β=λ in Theorem 4, we get the corollary.

Corollary 4

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Genocchi polynomials LGn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LGq+l[α,m-1](x,z;λ)=n=0qp=0lqnlp(z-y)Ln+pGq+l-p-n[α,m-1](x,y;λ).

Theorem 5

The following implicit summation formula involving Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b) holds true:LYn,β(α,m)(x,y+z;k,a,b)=s=0nnsYn-s,β(α,m)(z;k,a,b)ysLsxy.

Proof

When we replace y by y+z in (2.2), use (1.2) and rewrite the generating function, we conclude the proof of this theorem.

For k=a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 5, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 5

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Bernoulli polynomials LBn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LBn(α,m)(x,y+z;λ)=s=0nnsBn-s[α,m-1](z;λ)ysLsxy.

For k+1=-a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 5, we get the corollary.

Corollary 6

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Euler polynomials HEn(α,m)(x,y;λ) holds true:LEn[α,m-1](x,y+z;λ)=s=0nnsEn-s[α,m-1](z;λ)ysLsxy.

Letting k=-2a=b=1 and 2β=λ in Theorem 5, we get the corollary.

Corollary 7

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Genocchi polynomials LGn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LGn[α,m-1](x,y+z;λ)=s=0nnsGn-s[α,m-1](z;λ)ysLsxy.

Theorem 6

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b) holds true:LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b)=r=0nnrYn-r,β(α,m)(y-u;k,a,b)xrLrxu.

Proof

By exploiting the generating function (1.2), we can write Equation (2.2) as(3.2) 21-ktkβbet-abh=0m-1thh!αe(y-u)teutJ02xt=n=0Yn,β(α,m)(y-u;k,a,b)tnn!r=0xrLr(xu)trr!.(3.2)

Now replacing n by n-r in the right-hand side and using the lemma (Srivastava & Manocha, bib36) in the right-hand side of Equation (3.2), we complete the proof of the theorem.

For k=a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 6, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 8

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Bernoulli polynomials LBn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LBn[α,m-1](x,y;λ)=r=0nnrBn-r[α,m-1](y-u;λ)xrLrxu.

For k+1=-a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 6, we get the corollary.

Corollary 9

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Euler polynomials LEn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LEn[α,m-1](x,y;λ)=r=0nnrEn-r[α,m-1](y-u;λ)xrLrxu.

Letting k=-2a=b=1 and 2β=λ in Theorem 6, we get the corollary.

Corollary 10

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Genocchi polynomials LGn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LGn[α,m-1](x,y;λ)=r=0nnrGn-r[α,m-1](y-u;λ)xrLrxu.

Theorem 7

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b) holds true:LYn,β(α,m)(x,y+1;k,a,b)=r=0nnrLYn-r,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b).

Proof

By using the generating function (2.2), it is easy to prove this theorem.

For k=a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 7, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 11

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Bernoulli polynomials LBn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LBn[α,m-1](x,y+1;λ)=r=0nnrLBn-r[α,m-1](x,y;λ).

For k+1=-a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 7, we get the corollary.

Corollary 12

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Euler polynomials LEn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LEn[α,m-1](x,y+1;λ)=r=0nnrLEn-r[α,m-1](x,y;λ).

Letting k=-2a=b=1 and 2β=λ in Theorem 6, we get the corollary.

Corollary 13

The following implicit summation formulae for Laguerre-based Apostol-type Genocchi polynomials LGn[α,m-1](x,y;λ) holds true:LGn[α,m-1](x,y+1;λ)=r=0nnrLGn-r[α,m-1](x,y;λ).

4. Symmetry identities for the Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials

In this section, we give general symmetry identities for the generalized Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials LYn,β(α,m)(x,y;k,a,b) by applying the generating function (2.1) and (2.2).

Theorem 8

The following identity holds true:r=0nnrdrcLn-rYn-r,β(α,m)(dx,dy;k,a,b)LYr,β(α,m)(cw,cz;k,a,b)=r=0nnrcrdLn-rYn-r,β(α,m)(cx,cy;k,a,b)LYr,β(α,m)(dw,dz;k,a,b).

Proof

We start to prove by the following expression:g(t)=ckdk22(1-k)t2k(βbect-abh=0m-1thh!)βbedt-abh=0m-1thh!αexp(cd(x+z)t)J02cdytJ02cdwt.

Then the expression for g(t) is symmetric in a and b and we can expand g(t) into series in two ways to obtaing(t)=n=0LYn,β(α,m)(dx,dy;k,a,b)(ct)nn!r=0LYr,β(α,m)(cw,cz;k,a,b)(dt)rr!=n=0r=0nLYn-r,β(α,m)(dx,dy;k,a,b)(c)n-r(n-r)!LYr,β(α,m)(cw,cz;k,a,b)(d)rr!tn.

On similar lines we can show thatg(t)=n=0LYn,β(α,m)(cx,cy;k,a,b)(dt)nn!r=0LYr,β(α,m)(dw,dz;k,a,b)(ct)rr!=n=0r=0nLYn-r,β(α,m)(cx,cy;k,a,b)(d)n-r(n-r)!LYr,β(α,m)(dw,dz;k,a,b)(c)rr!tn

by comparing the coefficients of tn on the right-hand sides of the last two equations we arrive at the desired result.

For k=a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 8, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 14

We have the following symmetry identity for the Laguerre-based generalized Apostol-Bernoulli polynomialsr=0nnrdrcLn-rBn-r[α,m-1](dx,dy;λ)LBr[α,m-1](cw,cz;λ)=r=0nnrcrdLn-rBn-r[α,m-1](cx,cy;λ)LBr[α,m-1](dw,dz;λ).

For k+1=-a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 8, we get the corollary.

Corollary 15

We have for each pair of positive even integers c and d or for each pair of positive odd integers c and d.r=0nnrdrcLn-rEn-r[α,m-1](dx,dy;λ)LEr[α,m-1](cw,cz;λ)=r=0nnrcrdLn-rEn-r[α,m-1](cx,cy;λ)LEr[α,m-1](dw,dz;λ).

Letting k=-2a=b=1 and 2β=λ in Theorem 8, we get the corollary.

Corollary 16

We have for each pair of positive even integers c and d or for each pair of positive odd integers c and d.r=0nnrdrcLn-rGn-r[α,m-1](dx,dy;λ)LGr[α,m-1](cw,cz;λ)=r=0nnrcrdLn-rGn-r[α,m-1](cx,cy;λ)LGr[α,m-1](dw,dz;λ).

Theorem 9

The following identity holds true:r=0nnri=0c-1j=0d-1cn-rdLrYn-r,β(α,m)dx+dci+j,dy;k,a,bLYr,β(α,m)(cw,cz;k,a,b)=r=0nnri=0d-1j=0c-1crdLn-rYn-r,β(α,m)cx+cdi+j,cy;k,a,bLYr,β(α,m)(dw,dz;k,a,b).

Proof

Letg(t)=22(1-k)ckdkt2kβbect-abh=0m-1thh!βbedt-abh=0m-1thh!α(ecdt-1)2(ect-1)(edt-1)exp(cd(x+z)t)J02cdytJ02cdwt.

From this formula and using same technique as in Theorem 9, we arrive at the desired result.

For k=a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 8, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 17

We have the following symmetry identity for the Laguerre-based generalized Apostol-Bernoulli polynomialsr=0nnri=0c-1j=0d-1cn-rdLrBn-r[α,m-1]dx+dci+j,dy;λLBr[α,m-1](cw,cz;λ)=r=0nnri=0d-1j=0c-1crdLn-rBn-r[α,m-1]cx+cdi+j,cy;λLBr[α,m-1](dw,dz;λ).

For k+1=-a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 9, we get the corollary.

Corollary 18

We have for each pair of positive even integers and d or for each pair of positive odd integers c and d r=0nnri=0c-1j=0d-1cn-rdLrEn-r[α,m-1]dx+dci+j,dy;λLEr[α,m-1](cw,cz;λ)=r=0nnri=0d-1j=0c-1crdLn-rEn-r[α,m-1]cx+cdi+j,cy;λLEr[α,m-1](dw,dz;λ).

Letting k=-2a=b=1 and 2β=λ in Theorem 9, we get the corollary.

Corollary 19

We have for each pair of positive even integers c and d or for each pair of positive odd integers c and d.r=0nnri=0c-1j=0d-1cn-rdLrGn-r[α,m-1]dx+dci+j,dy;λLGr[α,m-1](cw,cz;λ)=r=0nnri=0d-1j=0c-1crdLn-rGn-r[α,m-1]cx+cdi+j,cy;λLGr[α,m-1](dw,dz;λ).

Theorem 10

The following identity holds true:r=0nnri=0c-1j=0d-1cn-rdLrYn-r,β(α,m)dx+dci,dy;k,a,bLYr,β(α,m)(cw+cdj,cz;k,a,b)=r=0nnri=0d-1j=0c-1crdLn-rYn-r,β(α,m)cx+cdi,cy;k,a,bLYr,β(α,m)(dw+dcj,dz;k,a,b).

Proof

The proof is analogous to Theorem 9. So we omit the proof of this theorem.

For k=a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 10, we get the following corollary.

Corollary 20

We have the following symmetry identity for the Laguerre-based generalized Apostol-Bernoulli polynomialsr=0nnri=0c-1j=0d-1cn-rdLrBn-r[α,m-1]dx+dci,dy;λLBr[α,m-1](cw+cdj,cz;λ)=r=0nnri=0d-1j=0c-1crdLn-rBn-r[α,m-1]cx+cdi,cy;λLBr[α,m-1](dw+dcj,dz;λ).

For k+1=-a=b=1 and β=λ in Theorem 10, we state the following corollary.

Corollary 21

We have for each pair of positive even integers c and d or for each pair of positive odd integers c and d m=0nnri=0c-1j=0d-1cn-rdLrEn-r[α,m-1]dx+dci,dy;λLEr[α,m-1](cw+cdj,cz;λ)=r=0nnri=0d-1j=0c-1crdLn-rEn-r[α,m-1]cx+cdi,cy;λLEr[α,m-1](dw+dcj,dz;λ).

Letting k=-2a=b=1 and 2β=λ in Theorem 10, we get the corollary.

Corollary 22

We have for each pair of positive even integers c and d or for each pair of positive odd integers c and d r=0nnri=0c-1j=0d-1cn-rdLrGn-r[α,m-1]dx+dci,dy;λLGr[α,m-1](cw+cdj,cz;λ)=r=0nnri=0d-1j=0c-1crdLn-rGn-r[α,m-1]cx+cdi,cy;λGr[α,m-1](dw+dcj,dz;λ).

5. Conclusion

In Section , we have established the generating functions for the Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials and Laguerre-based Apostol-type Hermite polynomials by making use of Tricomi function of the generating function for Laguerre polynomials. The equivalent forms of these generating functions can be derived by using Equations (1.1), (1.6) and (2.1). They can be viewed as the equivalent forms of the generating functions (2.3), (2.6) and (2.8), respectively. In the previous sections, we have used the concepts and the formalism associated with Laguerre polynomials to introduce the Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials and Laguerre-based Apostol-type Hermite polynomials and establish their properties. The approach presented here is general and we have established the summation rules, which can be used to derive the results for Laguerre-based Apostol-type polynomials from the results of the corresponding Appell polynomials.

Additional information

Funding

The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Notes on contributors

Serkan Araci

Serkan Araci was born in Hatay, Turkey, on 1 October 1988. He received his BS and MS degrees in mathematics from the University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey, in 2010 and 2013, respectively. Additionally, the title of his MS thesis is “Bernstein polynomials and their reflections in analytic number theory” and, for this thesis, he received the Best Thesis Award of 2013 from the University of Gaziantep. He has published more than 90 papers in reputed international journals. His research interests include p-adic analysis, analytic theory of numbers, q-series and q-polynomials, and theory of umbral calculus. Araci is an editor and a referee for some international journals.

References

  • Araci, S., Bagdasaryan, A., Özel, C., & Srivastava, H. M. (2014). New symmetric identities involving q-zeta type functions. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 8, 2803–2808.
  • Araci, S., Şen, E., Acikgoz, M., & Orucoglu, K. (2015). Identities involving some new special polynomials arising from the applications of Fractional calculus. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 9, 2657–2662.
  • Comtet, L. (1974). Advanced combinatorics: The art of finite and infinite expansions. (J. W. Nienhuys)Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Khan, S., Al-Saad, M. W., & Khan, R. (2010). Laguerre-based Appell polynomials: Properties and applications. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52, 247–259.
  • Kilbas, A. A., Srivastava, H. M., & Trujillo, J. J. (2006). Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. North-Holland Mathematics Studies (Vol. 204). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Kurt, B. (2010). A further generalization of Bernoulli polynomials and on the 2D -Bernoulli polynomials . Applied Mathematical Sciences, 4, 2315–2322.
  • Luke, Y. L. (1969). The special functions and their approximations. Academic Press: Elsevier.
  • Luo, Q. M. (2006). Apostol-Euler polynomials of higher order and gaussian hypergeometric functions. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, 10, 917–925.
  • Luo, Q. M. (2011). Extension for the Genocchi polynomials and its fourier expansions and integral representations. Osaka Journal of Mathematics, 48, 291–310.
  • Luo, Q. M., & Srivastava, H. M. (2005). Some generalizations of the Apostol-Bernoulli and Apostol-Euler polynomials. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 308, 290–302.
  • Luo, Q. M., & Srivastava, H. M. (2006). Some relationships between the Apostol-Bernoulli and Apostol-Euler polynomials. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 51, 631–642.
  • Luo, Q. M., & Srivastava, H. M. (2011a). -Extensions of some relationships between the Bernoulli and Euler polynomials. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, 15, 241–257.
  • Luo, Q. M., & Srivastava, H. M. (2011b). Some generalizations of the Apostol-Genocchi polynomials and the Stirling numbers of the second kind. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217, 5702–5728.
  • Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F., & Soni, R. P. (1966). Formulas and theorems for the special functions of mathematical physics. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 52.
  • Ozarslan, M. A. (2011). Unified Apostol-Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 6, 2452–2462.
  • Ozarslan, M. A. (2013). Hermite-Based unified Apostol-Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials. Advances in Differential Equations, doi:10.1186/1687-1847-213-116
  • Ozden, H. (2010). Unification of generating functions of the Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi numbers and polynomials. ICNAAM 2010: International Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, 1281, 1125–1127.
  • Ozden, H. (2011). Generating function of the unified representation of the Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials of higher order. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS ICNAAM 2011: International Conference on Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, 1389, 349–352.
  • Ozden, H., Simsek, Y., & Srivastava, H. M. (2010). A unified presentation of the generating functions of the generalized Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 60, 2779–2287.
  • Pathan, M. A. (2012). A new class of generalized Hermite-Bernoulli polynomials. Georgian Mathematical Journal, 19, 559–573.
  • Pathan, M. A., & Khan, W. A. (2015). Some implicit summation formulas and symmetric identities for the generalized Hermite--Bernoulli polynomials. Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics, 12, 679–695.
  • Srivastava, H. M. (2014). Some generalizations and basic (or q-) extensions of the Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 5, 390–444.
  • Srivastava, H. M., & Manocha, H. L. (1984). A treatise on generating functions. New York, NY: Ellis Horwood Limited.
  • Srivastava, H. M., Garg, M., & Choudhary, S. (2011). Some new families of generalized Euler and Genocchi polynomials. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, 15, 283–305.
  • Srivastava, H. M., Kurt, B., & Simsek, Y. (2012). Some families of Genocchi type polynomials and their interpolation functions. Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 23, 919–938. [Corrigendum Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 23, 939--940].
  • Tremblay, T., Gaboury, S., & Fug{‘{e}}re, B. J. (2011). A new class of generalized Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials and some analogues of the Srivastava-Pintér addition theorem. Applied Mathematics Letters, 24, 1888–1893.
  • Tuenter, H. J. H. (2001). A symmetry power sum of polynomials and Bernoulli numbers. The American Mathematical Monthly, 108, 258–261.