Abstract
The measurement of organizational satisfaction is a popular topic in organizational science; however, less attention is given to organizational happiness. There are very few measuring tools designed to evaluate organizational happiness. While the value-mediating role of higher education is indisputable, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to address organizational happiness in the context of higher education. In addition, this study proposes new data-driven approaches to analyze patterns of answers (i.e. regarding individual happiness); therefore, the relationships among individuals, groups, and organizational happiness can be better analyzed. This study is based on survey data; nevertheless, in addition to measuring organizational happiness in Hungarian higher education, this paper proposes using infrequently used data-driven approaches to determine who feels happy/unhappy in what areas.
Public interest statement
The measurement of organizational satisfaction is a popular topic in organizational science; however, less attention is given to organizational happiness. There are very few measuring tools designed to evaluate organizational happiness. While the value-mediating role of higher education is indisputable, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to address organizational happiness in the context of higher education. In addition, this study proposes new data-driven approaches to analyze patterns of answers (i.e., regarding individual happiness); therefore, the relationships among individuals, groups, and organizational happiness can be better analyzed. This study is based on survey data. The proposed approach has implications for scholars, practitioners, and decision-makers as well.
Acknowledgments
The research is supported by the Research Centre at the Faculty of Business and Economics (No PE-GTK-GSKK A095000000-4) of the University of Pannonia (Veszprém, Hungary).
Code and Data Availability
We used R Studio, where the R notebook file contains both scripts and anonymous data sources. The R notebook is available upon request.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Consent to participate
Yes.
Consent to Publication
Yes.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Zsolt Tibor Kosztyán
Zsolt T. Kosztyán, Ph.D. habil. His research interest is the development of methodologies to manage complex management problems and systems relating to mathematical models and algorithms of project management, production, maintenance, and network science..
Tibor Csizmadia
Tibor Csizmadia, Ph.D. habil. His area of research interest and expertise includes quality management in higher education. He has conducted research in academic and industrial settings.
Beáta Sz.G. Pató
Beáta Sz. G. Pató, Ph.D. habil. Her research and development projects are supported by US and European Union grants. Her research focus is job descriptions, competencies, SCM, logistics, and an expert in these fields as well.
Szilárd Berke
Szilárd Berke, Ph.D. habil. His research interests include leadership, organizational behavior, and strategic management.
Ildiko Neumanné-Virág
Ildikó Neumanné-Virág, Ph.D. Her research fields are European integration, international economics, and international trade and their statistical analysis and modeling, such as the gravity model, which has empirical success in explaining various types of flows, including migration, tourism, and international trade.
Andrea Bencsik
Andrea Bencsik, Ph.D. habil. Her research and teaching areas are knowledge-change and human resources management.