859
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING

Text mining analysis on research trends in workplace safety engagement education

& ORCID Icon
Article: 2197665 | Received 30 Jul 2022, Accepted 15 Mar 2023, Published online: 04 May 2023

Abstract

The importance of workplace safety education is being emphasized as a method to minimize damage caused by industrial accidents. This study identified research trends and major components of workplace safety education to establish an academic basis for providing education that enables organizational members to engage in safety at work. A literature search was performed by setting search terms based on education-related words, such as workplace safety education, safety engagement, workplace learning, and vocational training. Eighty articles were selected through the systematic literature review method, and the selected articles were used as unstructured data for research. The R program (version 3.6.3) was used to perform text mining. As a result of the analysis, the topics related to workplace safety education comprised four factors: education component, organizational risk management, workplace environment, and safety competency. This study explored the main themes necessary for workplace safety education model development and derived sub-components. In addition, this study identifies the educational content, methods, and programs to be introduced in Korea and seeks academic and practical directions for future research.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background of study

Industrial accidents are a serious social problem that negatively affects businesses and society by causing damage to human life and property (Loomis et al., Citation1997; O’brien et al., Citation2018). To reduce accidents and keep companies and people safe, it is essential to improve safety awareness and teach safety compliance to workers (Dembe, Citation2001; Hofmann et al., Citation2003; Seo et al., Citation2021). Previous studies have reported that most industrial accidents are caused by human errors, such as mistakes, negligence, and a lack of safety awareness (Dembe, Citation2001; Griffin & Neal, Citation2000; Hofmann et al., Citation2003; Michael et al., Citation2005; Zohar, Citation2010). Therefore, various studies have been conducted in academic and industrial fields to raise employees’ safety awareness, reduce industrial accidents, and establish a safe workplace environment.

The workplace, including industrial sites, is not merely a workspace but also a living space for people. When the time employees spend at work is meaningful and positive, individuals voluntarily engage themselves in their work and contribute to the improvement of organizational performance (Maslen, Citation2014; Ripamonti & Scaratti, Citation2015; Seo & Hong, Citation2022). In previous studies related to workplace learning, various topics have been addressed, such as workplace learning, formation, commitment, participation, and innovation, but studies on learning about safety in the workplace remain scarce (Gao et al., Citation2019; Maslen, Citation2014; Nam Kung, Citation2017; Park & Kang, Citation2017). Safety can be defined as a situation where no human or material loss occurs, even in the case of an accident, and safety is paramount in daily life, including in work environments.

Workplace safety education impacts workers’ safety engagement and positively affects the awareness of workers, managers, and management alike. According to previous studies, workplace safety education plays a role in improving the maturity of workplace safety engagement by inducing workers to engage in safety behaviors, establishing and modifying the organization’s safety management system, and forming a safety culture or climate (Gao et al., Citation2019; Mavrikios et al., Citation2013; Seo et al., Citation2021; Seo & Hong, Citation2022). However, research related to workplace safety education remains limited because no specific educational model or major components have been established as effective pedagogy.

1.2. Problem statement

Previous workplace safety education has been conducted practically by reflecting field characteristics as part of the education suitable for each work context as members exchange work-related information with each other at specific sites (Kim et al., Citation2020; Somerville & Lloyd, Citation2007; Stemn et al., Citation2018). The most significant difference from studies in other educational fields is that workplace safety education has no theoretical basis, unlike adult learning or general education. Workplace safety education started with insurance companies raising that the frequency of accidents occurring in an industry depends on the characteristics of the industry at industrial sites and the degree of unsafe employee behaviours, which is seen to be the main cause of accidents. As insurance companies investigated the main causes of safety accidents at industrial sites, the field of safety education took shape within the field of industrial safety engineering by identifying an absence of safety-related content in job training. Accordingly, it is necessary to conduct research on safety education from the perspective of convergence research in the field of education.

In practical terms, workplace safety education is divided according to general workers, managers, and management, although this is problematic because there is no significant difference in content. In particular, learners’ roles in the organization have not been clearly understood. This is due to a lack of understanding of work environments, occupations, and experiences. To solve these problems, it is necessary to establish an academic framework for research related to workplace safety education and to analyze its major constituent factors.

Because workplace safety education supports the development of human safety competency through practical training as an essential factor in the process of workplace education, we determined the necessity for a pedagogical model concerning workplace safety education that has until now only been studied sporadically in the fields of safety engineering, business administration, and education. Moreover, workplace safety is a concept that should be embodied in employees.

1.3. Research objective

In this study, the main themes required to develop a model of workplace safety education were explored, and the sub-components were derived. The subcomponents of workplace safety education derived from a literature search were used as basic data for developing a workplace safety education model. In addition, by identifying research trends related to workplace safety education, the contents, methods, and education programs suitable for the Korean context were identified, and academic and practical directions for future research were sought.

We used text mining of academic research on workplace safety education to collect data for this study. Text mining has attracted attention as a research method. It is used in various techniques, such as statistics, networks, frequency, and visualization analysis, to assess large amounts of text data. In this study, text mining was performed using academic literature as text data (Seo & Hong, Citation2022; Xu et al., Citation2021). Specifically, text frequency analysis and keyword network analysis were performed to derive keywords and interpret research trends. By applying text mining analysis, data were analyzed to identify research trends, and the content of the education and the main themes were examined. In addition, we suggest educational content, methods, and programs that organizations should introduce to improve workplace safety engagement. Finally, we explore the academic and practical directions for follow-up research.

2. Theoretical background

2.1. Safety competency in the workplace

Safety competency is a concept that includes safety awareness, safety attitudes, and safety compliance. Safety competency means that people can perform appropriate safety behaviors at work based on their knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions necessary to ensure safety in daily life (Han et al., Citation2009; Lim & Ahn, Citation2014; Wright et al., Citation2019). In industrial organizations, safety competency can be defined as the ability of employees to perform work successfully while fully immersing themselves in safety in the workplace environment. Safety competency in the industrial site plays an important function at both the organizational and individual levels. The improvement of safety capability protects members from various damages and threats caused by accidents and maintains continuous organizational functioning (Ripamonti & Scaratti, Citation2015). At the organizational level, a safe organizational climate ensures continuity of work. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss in detail safety education programs that teach safety competency with an understanding of the specific field, such as workplace risk factors and safety factors.

Safety competency in the workplace can be divided into the individual psychological dimension and the organizational structural dimension. Safety competency at the individual level refers to the ability to comply with organizational safety management regulations based on safety awareness and safety attitudes and to perform individual tasks safely. For a job to be safely performed, it is necessary to understand an individual’s attitude about the job and to be able to sustain safety behaviour (Laurent et al., Citation2018). Research has suggested that employees’ safety behaviours are related to their job commitment and motivation and that employees are likely to behave insecurely if they feel unsafe. Processes for cognition, motivation, and responsibility, along with psychological processes, affect an employee’s sense of safety (Bakker & Demerouti, Citation2007; Zohar, Citation2000).

Safety competency at the organizational level is the ability to protect the organization from risks from inside and outside the organization (Ripamonti & Scaratti, Citation2015). The organization must provide a safe work environment for its members and ensure work continuity, even in the event of an accident. Safety competency required in the workplace consists of a series of efforts to establish systems, tasks, regulations, and guidelines related to the organization’s safety and health management, to actively implement this content in organizational management, and to lower the level of accidents (Kaldenberg et al., Citation1995; Michael et al., Citation2005). Safety competency induces employees to behave safely at work and ultimately plays a role in workplace engagement.

2.2. Workplace safety competency and safety education

There are differences in what should be included in training based on the target audience (i.e., organizational role) within an organization (Park & Kang, Citation2017). Management training should strengthen leadership, including safety leadership and crisis management, to effectively respond to crises inside and outside the organization and motivate members (Al Thani & Obeidat, Citation2020; Clarke, Citation2013; Seo & Hong, Citation2020). Site workers must comply with safety rules and perform work processes in compliance with safety guidelines. In addition, safety managers are obliged to provide guidance and advice to the workplace regarding how to investigate the cause and prevent recurrence in the event of a disaster (Yang & Park, Citation2013). Before implementing safety education in the workplace, it is necessary to understand the difference between each subject’s roles and responsibilities to target their safety education appropriately. Systematic learning results can be expected when a safety education program reflects the job characteristics or positions of the learners.

In a practical context, safety education can be explained by two theoretical concepts: “engagement” and “embodied cognition.” In safety education, experiences based on the learner’s engagement and activeness are emphasized, and the learning effects can be improved when experiential engagement-oriented education is conducted (Gao et al., Citation2019; Goldenhar et al., Citation2001; Son, Citation2014). In immersion theory, the learning outcomes derived from the learner’s experience are divided into cognitive, emotional, and behavioural dimensions (Christian & Slaughter, Citation2007; O’brien et al., Citation2018). Recent studies related to safety education in industrial organizations have been actively researching the field of research on the development of experiential safety education programs based on virtual reality (VR) technology. (Flavián et al., Citation2019; Meyer et al., Citation2019). Virtual reality technology provides an environment that utilizes entirely virtual content through immersive equipment and can build an engaging educational environment. In these studies, an experiential education program was designed so that field workers could learn to predict risk factors in the field. This safety education program attempts to increase the applicability and effectiveness in the field based on immersion theory.

Embodied cognition emphasizes interactions with the external environment to understand human cognitive activity (Barling et al., Citation2002). Embodied cognitive theory and embodied learning challenge the existing view that does not consider the effects of the environment on cognition. Thus, cognitive action emerges through experience, such as the learner’s interaction with a given contextual learning environment. According to embodied learning, safety education programs can improve safety competency by allowing learners to recognize and directly perform safety behaviors by interacting with the learning environment.

3. Materials and methods

Text mining (a big-data analysis technique) was performed in this study. Specifically, the literature search was performed after setting a search term, and literature suitable for the research topic was selected. The selected articles were converted into unstructured texts and analyzed through the R program (Version 3.6.3). Accordingly, word frequency analysis and topic modeling were performed to identify research trends in workplace safety education, major research topics, and sub-components. In addition, network analysis was performed based on topics derived through topic modeling. The detailed research procedure is as follows.

3.1. Materials

In this study, academic literature was investigated for text data construction. To limit the scope of the literature to “workplace safety education,” “workplace learning,” “safety,” and “occupational” were selected as essential search terms. Online databases were used to conduct searches, including the Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS), National Digital Science Leaders (NDSL), Science Direct, Social Sciences Citation Index, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Directory of Open Access Journals, Scopus, Springer, and SAGE. A literature search was performed using the detailed article search function.

The search language was set to English, and “-hospital, -nurse, -nursing, -patient, -clinical, -medical, -child” were selected as exclusion words to exclude areas other than occupational safety when searching the literature. Specifically, the literature search was conducted in two stages. The primary literature search took place from January 19 to 2 February 2022 (14 days). The secondary literature search was carried out for a total of 14 days from February 3 to 16 February 2022, and during this period, additional literature searches and a final literature derivation were performed. The searched articles were classified according to systematic literature review guidelines (Moher et al., Citation2009) presented by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) group. To derive the final articles to be used as text data, literature was selected by applying the PICO process. The PICO process is a select method of articles used in evidence-based practice to frame and develop literature search strategies, for instance, in systematic reviews (Luijendijk, Citation2021; Richardson et al., Citation1995). The PICO process is a literature review method that is divided into four stages: “Participation”, “Interaction”, “Comparison”, and “Outcomes” and proceeds in sequence. This research method is widely used in literature reviews and qualitative meta-analyses as a way to construct a search strategy suitable for research purposes.

Figure presents the PRISMA flow chart for the selection of research literature. A total of 516 articles were searched for the first step. 297 articles related to exclusion words such as hospital, nursing, and medical care were deleted. 48 articles that did not have original texts or were duplicated were deleted. In addition, 44 documents that did not undergo peer review, such as academic conference proceedings, were also deleted.

Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart for deriving analytical articles.

This figure shows the flow chart of constructing text data for use in analysis in this study. First, articles that do not have original texts or are duplicated are deleted. In the second step, literature irrelevant to the research topic is deleted. Third, missing literature is added to the data through literature analysis. Finally, literature suitable for the topic is finally selected.
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart for deriving analytical articles.

In the selection step, the PICO process was applied. The PICO process was carried out through a total of four steps. In the “Participation” stage, literature with topics related to education, such as employee education, organizational learning, job training, and workplace learning, was selected. In the “Intervention” stage, literature was selected on topics related to engagement, such as participation, leadership, attitude, and commitment. The “Comparison” stage was not set because there was no control group. In the “Outcomes” stage, research literature presenting workplace safety education results was selected. What is included in “Outcomes” means the result when members are engaged in safety, such as safety engagement, safety compliance, safety behaviour, and safety commitment. Table presented the PICO process in details.

Table 1. Presenting the PICO process applied in the screening step

Through screening, 127 articles were selected, and a total of 76 research papers were selected after excluding papers that did not fit the research topic. In the Eligibility step, 76 previously selected literature on safety engagement, participation, commitment, and behaviour were analysed along with a database search to prevent the loss of essential data required for analysis. In order to secure essential data for analysis, 4 papers were added, and a total of 80 articles were constructed as analysis data.

The literature field was limited to job or employee education, such as employee learning, vocational education, and organizational learning. Participation, engagement, leadership, attitudes, and commitment were suggested as interventions in safety education (or training). In this study, workplace safety education was set as a concept that includes education, learning, and training. This study did not establish a comparison group for workplace safety education. This is because, when conducting a literature search, the details of lectures and practices were not specified in the educational method, and the classification criteria for the education content were not set. Safety engagement, compliance, and behaviours were presented as outcomes of safety education.

Four articles were added to the data for analysis (Laberge et al., Citation2014; Nathai-Balkissoon, Citation2018; Reed & Claunch, Citation2017; Singh et al., Citation2020). During the initial phase of the literature review, we searched for and selected articles relevant to the subject of this study from the research papers included in the literature. Additional selected research literature was generated as unstructured data and served as a factor in constructing the analysis data. Finally, 80 articles were selected and constructed as text data.

3.2. Methods

In this study, text mining was applied as the data analysis method. The R program (version 3.6.3) was used to analyze and construct data from the selected 80 articles as text data. To examine the keywords of the study regarding workplace safety education, overall keyword frequency analysis, and network analysis were performed. A frequency analysis of keywords extracted from the collected article set was conducted. Keywords with important meanings for each frequency were listed, and topic modeling was performed by calculating the weights of the words. In addition, a centrality analysis between important keywords was performed, and the analysis results were visualized using a word cloud.

For the keyword frequency analysis, texts constructed from the data were first refined according to the purpose of the study. Using the dplyr package and the tm package in R, spaces were removed, as were numbers and special characters. The text forms were unified with lowercase letters, and stop words were removed. Additionally, the terms “based,” “related,” “put,” “give,” “high,” and “paper,” which are unlikely to present the characteristics of the research topic, were added to and removed from the negative dictionary, even if the frequency of occurrence was high. For the visualization of important keywords, the WordCloud package was used. To identify keywords that are influential in research trends related to workplace safety education, a network was constructed with frequently analyzed keywords, and their characteristics were analyzed. The network was visualized using the tidygraph package and the ggraph package by calculating the intrinsic centrality and clustering the texts.

According to previous studies, it is most appropriate to determine the number of topics according to the interpretation derived from the topic, the usefulness of the research content, the scope of analysis, and the judgment of qualified researchers (DiMaggio et al., Citation2013; McFarland et al., Citation2013; Seo et al., Citation2022). Moreover, when setting the number of topics, when the research scope is analyzed in a large category, the number of topics is small, and when exploring subdivisions, the number of topics can be set and extracted. Therefore, this study tried to establish the concept of workplace safety education by examining research trends in workplace safety education conducted to immerse workers in the workplace. We also analyzed the trends and scope of the content.

The analysis was performed by setting four topics: job, work environment, risk management, and safety competency. A text frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) weighting model was used to evaluate importance, judged by the frequency of word occurrences in the text for each topic. Using this technique, words with high importance were analyzed according to the value of the TF-IDF model by assigning weights and word frequency.

4. Results and discussion

In this study, topic modeling and keyword network analysis were performed for 80 research articles on workplace safety education research. This chapter presents and discusses the general characteristics of literature review data, text frequency analysis results, topic modeling results, and keyword network analysis results.

4.1. Publication trends by year

Figure presents the publication trends for research related to workplace safety education by year. This shows that there are some fluctuations for the 80 analyzed papers, but the number of articles has steadily increased over time.

Figure 2. Number of publications in workplace safety education articles by year.

In this figure, the publication date of the research literature is presented as a time series graph.
Figure 2. Number of publications in workplace safety education articles by year.

Workplace safety education is a recognized field of organizational management and job education, and academic discussion has been conducted in earnest since the early 2000s (Griffin & Neal, Citation2004; Michael et al., Citation2005). Given the correlation between organizational safety climate and individual safety behavior, it is important to encourage employees’ motivation, knowledge, and participation in safety behaviors through safety education (Griffin & Neal, Citation2004). In another study, productivity, quality, and safety were suggested as the three major goals of an organization’s safety management system (Michael et al., Citation2005). Since these studies were published, research has begun on safety education as an influencing factor in work engagement. Workplace safety education-related research has been conducted on job demands, job resources, organizational commitment, employee engagement, human resources, job characteristics, and workplace environments (Hanvold et al., Citation2019; Laurent et al., Citation2014).

4.2. Text frequency analysis

A total of 3,049 words were used for analysis in this study, and up to 50 keywords related to safety education were identified in order of frequency. The derived workplace safety education research keywords were mostly focused on the practical aspects of education, such as development, analysis, effectiveness, education, research, industry, and workers in educational programs. Excluding the key search terms “workplace learning” and “safety,” education, industrial, workers, training, work, study, and disaster were found to have high frequencies (Gherardi & Nicolini, Citation2000; Lukic et al., Citation2010; Seok, Citation2018).

Based on data from these keywords, education for industrial field workers mainly consisted of training for disasters. In workplace safety, trainees mainly work in the construction industry, where the workplace environment is a construction site, so they can be directly affected by natural disasters, such as earthquakes, heavy rain, heavy snowfall, and typhoons. Therefore, the content of workplace safety education should include countermeasures for such natural disasters that occur mainly in the area where the site is located, along with information considering the characteristics of the particular job. When potential disasters are discussed, workplace risks can be identified more clearly, and workers can respond more safely.

It was further found that research on the development of professional manpower training programs has mainly focused on workers and managers, including safety site managers. The importance of individual competency, consciousness, attitude, and motivation was emphasized in safety education for companies. The most common types of research included those that developed professional workforce-nurturing programs and studies analyzing the effectiveness of education and training programs (Ha, Citation2019; Jeong, Citation2020; Littlejohn et al., Citation2014; Maslen, Citation2014; May et al., Citation2019; Moher et al., Citation2009; Son, Citation2014; Stuart, Citation2014). Kim et al. (Citation2007) and Ha (Citation2019) applied various analytical models to improve safety education-related effectiveness, efficiency, and effectiveness. Yap and Choy (Citation2018) found that safety education for workers increases efficiency based on integrated interactions, such as the workplace environment, managers, and colleagues.

Safety education program research is primarily conducted in the construction industry, but recently, research has also been conducted in the energy industry, including wind power and offshore industries (Gherardi & Nicolini, Citation2000; Ha, Citation2019; Hadikusumo et al., Citation2017; K. S. Kim & Lee, Citation2021; Park & Kang, Citation2017; Sim & Kang, Citation2017; Yap & Choy, Citation2018). Research on the development of VR-based safety education, based on immersion theory and transfer theory, has been conducted, and safety behavior induction has been presented as a tangible result (Nykänen et al., Citation2020; Seo et al., Citation2021). In particular, the VR-based safety education program has attracted attention as a virtual education method. Table presents the keywords explained above and the frequency and centrality of the words.

Table 2. Keyword frequency analysis and centrality

Research on recent safety education programs responding to the COVID-19 situation was explored, and various measures have been discussed to continue education, even during a pandemic. Specifically, there have been trends in virtual safety education programs, such as those that use ICT technology or mobile apps or are VR-based. Figure shows a word cloud visualizing the results of text frequency analysis.

Figure 3. Text-frequency word cloud analysis results.

This figure is presented as a word cloud for the frequency of words derived in this study. The higher the frequency of a word, the larger the font size, and the lower the frequency of a word, the smaller the font size. Colors are randomly matched.
Figure 3. Text-frequency word cloud analysis results.

4.3. Results of topic modeling

Topic modeling was conducted to understand the research topics most dealt with in workplace safety education-related research, and four topics were derived. Table shows the topic modeling results.

Table 3. Results of topic modeling

As shown in Table , Topic 1 showed the highest rate among the four topics at 32.91%. Topics 2, 3, and 4, were confirmed with 17.89%, 18.85%, and 30.37%, respectively.

Topic 1 was about “workplace safety education factors” and consisted of words such as “learning,” “training,” “workers,” “workplaces,” “occupational,” “construction,” “behavior,” and “factors.” Workplace safety education of workers in the industrial field consists of behavior- or attitude-based learning and mainly includes technical education-related topics directly applied in the workplace. Adult learning workplace safety education research was being conducted using words such as “higher” and “adult.”

In Topic 2, accounting for 17.89%, words such as “organizations,” “risks,” “behavior,” “education,” “young,” “participants,” “management,” “culture,” “incidents,” and “process” were identified as “organizational risk management” content. Risk management not only avoids and eliminates risks but also elucidates the reality of various risks facing industrial organizations and makes optimal decisions about these risks (Barb et al., Citation2021; Morillas et al., Citation2013). Ultimately, organizational risk management refers to a set of specific processes that effectively and efficiently carry out the mission and purpose of the organization. As shown in Topic 2, studies were mainly conducted on participation, behavior, education, process, risk management models, and member roles related to organizational risk management.

Topic 3 covers the “workplace environment” and consists of words like “workplaces,” “organizations,” “accidents,” “education,” “participants,” “effective,” “programs,” and “injuries.” In terms of the workplace environment, research was mainly conducted on “organization,” “thinking,” “education,” “participation,” and “effective programs.” Through words such as “psychological,” “feedback,” and “compliance,” psychological factors in the workplace environment were also identified as important research topics. Other topics being studied include education, continuous feedback, and technical education as countermeasures against accidents and injuries that occur mainly in the workplace.

Topic 4, “safety competency,” is composed of words such as “learning,” “work,” “organizations,” “occupational,” “health,” “practices,” “construction,” “behavior,” “knowledge,” “education,” and “leadership.” In studies related to workplace safety education, competency-related studies have been conducted to determine the competencies that leaders, members, and teams should possess. Topics studied in this category include sick and older workers, as well as personal equipment. Based on the Topic 4 word results, it is possible to infer the safety competencies required in the workplace. Table shows the TF-IDF analysis results by topic modeling. As shown in Table , a high frequency of mention of a word does not imply high importance. The TF-IDF value can be determined as the importance of words containing concepts considered important in each topic.

Table 4. Word frequency and importance calculation results

To develop a basic framework for developing a workplace safety education model, we determined that theory can be formed based on embodied cognitive theory and immersion theory when the major components of workplace safety education for industrial workers are identified. Both these theories comprise cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors, such as workplace safety regulations, work rules, sequence, and industry characteristics. In addition, it was determined that a model framework for workplace safety education could be established based on the factors derived from this study because it corresponds to the “behavioral” factor that enables workers to sustain safety behavior from a practical point of view.

4.4. Keyword network analysis

The network consisted of a total of 58 nodes and 113 edges. The network was constructed by classifying the nodes into three groups with high relevance. The divided topics were “safety,” “education,” and “program,” with words highly related to “safety” in pink, words highly related to “education” in green, and words related to “program” in blue. The node size is larger for words with higher frequencies, and the thickness of the edge does not reflect frequency. The shorter the edge length, the closer the words were to each other. Figure presents data visualized as a network.

Figure 4. Visualization of keyword network analysis results.

This is a graph visualizing a text network. If the relationship between keywords is high, they appear close, if they are low, they appear far, and the size of the node appears differently depending on the frequency of the word. If the keywords are highly related or similar, the nodes are displayed in the same color. In this figure, the network nodes are grouped in three colors.
Figure 4. Visualization of keyword network analysis results.

Network analysis confirmed that the frequency and relationship between “safety education” and “safety learning” were the highest. Although it is an education field, the relationship between “training” and “program” was the highest. Training is classified as experiential education and is considered to directly affect the induction of safety behavior, safety compliance, and formation of safety attitudes. Both education and learning can be classified as education, but learning was also related to words describing “interaction,” such as “environment” and “satisfaction.”

5. Discussion

The main themes of workplace safety education comprised the components of workplace safety education, organizational risk management, workplace environment, and safety competency. When the ratio of the four topics was calculated, “Topic 1(workplace safety education)” was 32.91%, “Topic 2(organizational risk management)” was 17.89%, “Topic 3(workplace environment)” was 18.84%, and “Topic 4(safety competency)” was 30.37%, respectively. As a result of classifying the topics, it was confirmed that the importance of safety competency is being emphasized along with safety education in the workplace. Because it is difficult to estimate the importance only with the high frequency of words, TF-IDF analysis was performed, and the results reflecting the importance demonstrated the same trend.

There were various components related to workplace safety education. These components could be classified based on cognition, emotion, and behaviour when interpreted from a pedagogical point of view (Chmiel et al., Citation2017; Lecours & Therriault, Citation2018; O’connor et al., Citation2014; Somerville & Lloyd, Citation2006). Safety competency comprised various factors, such as training, behaviour, knowledge, education, and leadership, and we analyzed these factors as necessary for competency development. The network analysis results confirmed that the connection between safety, education, program, and learning was the strongest. The concept emphasized in topic modeling and network analysis was “interaction,” which was identified as a concept including interactions between individuals and between the workplace environment and individual members. Interdisciplinary research on workplace safety education has been conducted in the lifelong learning and engineering fields.

Work regulations have included safety education in training new workers or re-educating workers. Team learning among workers has been emphasized, and the process of sharing experiences has been conceptualized as learning (Edmondson, Citation1999; Ennis, Citation2014; Haunschild & Sullivan, Citation2002; Yang et al., Citation2013). In these studies, team learning was defined as a process in which a senior worker becomes a mentor and leads a new worker, and the new worker experientially engages in the process. These studies interpreted safety broadly, including the safety of the work environment, the physical and psychological safety of workers, and the safety in relationships with managers.

As the meaning of the workplace has expanded from merely a workspace to a daily living space, interdisciplinary studies have been conducted in education, psychology, business administration, and safety engineering to safely manage the workplace as an everyday living space. Safety education becomes more effective when various aspects, such as human cognition, emotion, and behaviour, are considered.

Individual and organizational factors, such as managers, workers, environment, psychology, leadership, and environment, were identified in a complex manner. Interactive workplace safety education enhanced learning and ultimately motivated employees to engage in safety. Based on this text mining-based study, research trends and implications related to workplace safety education will be discussed below.

First, studies related to workplace safety education have mainly been conducted on the effects of training-based education rather than lecture-based education. The words that appeared the most in the related research literature were “industrial, workers, training, disaster, research, [and] construction,” except for key search terms. In particular, “training” was an influential word in the keyword network analysis. This is because workplace safety education is training based on practicing actual behaviours and experiences, as simple theoretical education is not a useful way to teach workers safety behaviours. However, workplace safety education does not have an academic background. It was the beginning of education to inform the workers of the risk factors in the field at the time. It has become a form of education in the process of sharing experiences about risky situations that occur during the work process. As the existing workplace safety education-related research reflects work characteristics and risks in the field, it developed based on safety in engineering, and the underlying theories were mostly based on risk scenario techniques or accident case analysis (Cooper, Citation2009; Olson et al., Citation2009). Recent interdisciplinary studies have been conducted in various fields, such as education, organization, and business administration, to resolve this problem, but further research is needed on research models to develop safety capabilities.

Second, a total of four topics were derived from the topic modeling analysis: Topic 1 (workplace safety education factors), Topic 2 (organizational risk management), Topic 3 (workplace environment), and Topic 4 (safety competencies). Topic 1 keywords identified major elements constituting workplace safety education, such as job training. These words related to technology, equipment, and performance of safety education, and the words suggested field-related factors that should be reflected in workplace safety education. Workplace safety education could be developed based on these theories. In particular, the results suggest that behavior-based education content should be structured around “experiences.”

The main keywords constituting Topic 2 are related to organizational risk management, factors necessary for organizational management, the safety management organization model, and the risk management framework. As a result of deriving TF-IDF by calculating the importance, it was determined that it was highly relevant to organizational management, such as culture, participation, behavior, rules, and colleagues. Future research should additionally analyze the relevance of the organizational management development strategy that analyzes characteristics and jobs when performing workplace safety education. Topic 3 is about the workplace environment and encompasses the characteristics of the workplace, employees’ psychological characteristics, job characteristics, and organizational systems. Through the TF-IDF calculation result, it was inferred that accidents or injuries occurring in the workplace are reflected in education and that it is important to provide continuous feedback. If individual factors were identified as important concepts and physical environment and conditions were considered important in the workplace, it was judged that the importance of individual members had increased recently.

Topic 4 was about safety competency and consisted of key terms such as behavior, knowledge, leadership, personal protective equipment, and age. The ultimate goal of workplace safety education is to improve the safety competency of all organization members so that they can immerse themselves in safety at work and maintain the organization continuously. By analyzing the terms emphasized in Topic 4, safety competency was conceptualized as the ability to identify risks in the workplace, such as behavior, training, knowledge, risk factors, and failure, and the ability to analyze protective equipment and systems. Analyzing the frequency of the co-occurrence words using keyword network analysis and performing centrality analysis revealed that links, such as safety—education, safety—learning, and training—program, had high frequency and relevance in the overall study.

6. Conclusion and implications

This study analyzed the research trends in workplace safety education using text mining and other big data analysis techniques. Specifically, research data was analyzed, and text frequency analysis and keyword network analysis were performed on a total of 80 articles related to workplace safety education to examine the main study topics and the characteristics of the knowledge structure. To build basic data for a workplace safety education model, we analyzed the important topics in workplace safety education, the frequency of words constituting each topic, and the keyword network.

6.1. Implication of the research findings

As a result of the correlation analysis, safety, education, and program were primarily divided into three groups, and research on education and training programs was mainly conducted. In addition, the correlation between words related to interactions, such as workers, environment, workplace, psychological, and behavior, was confirmed. These words are also highly related to factors that play a positive role in improving learning immersion according to immersion theory. It is predicted that future research will continue examining the elements of safety education and interaction-related topics necessary to ensure a safe work environment and improve the maturity of safety engagement.

6.2. Limitations of the research

Research on workplace safety education conducted relatively recently suggests a growing interest in maintaining a safe daily life and solving inclusive social problems. This study comprehensively explored research trends, such as the concept, components, and core topics of workplace safety education. The analysis and discussion were conducted to include the spatial and psychological concept of “workplace,” which was not included in any previous safety education. Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. First, academic research on workplace safety education has only been actively conducted since the 2000s, meaning the overall amount of research literature was not large. Since the literature used to construct the text data corpus was limited to academic papers, we determined that it would be somewhat difficult to generalize the research trend of workplace safety education. In addition, although this study attempted to secure the objectivity of the research by using text mining, it is difficult to be sure that researcher subjectivity was completely excluded.

Workplace safety education research is a relatively recent concept, and research was conducted first in the field of engineering, not in the field of pedagogy. Therefore, there was also a limitation in that there was a greater ratio of literature in the field of engineering than in the field of education. This study was conducted to prepare basic data for constructing an appropriate theoretical model by interpreting the meaning of workplace safety education from an educational point of view. Based on engagement, the number of topics suitable for cognition, emotion, behavior, and interaction was determined, and the keywords constituting each topic were analyzed to derive topics and sub-factors necessary for the development of a safety education model. However, we additionally feel, it is necessary to strengthen the connection with the education sector.

6.3. Future research

We intend to develop an in-depth understanding of the influence and relationship of key concepts that constitute workplace safety education. To increase the objectivity of effectiveness, causality, and measurement tools, it is expected that additional analyses, such as path analysis and social network analysis, will be performed to expand the discussion. This study performed text mining to explore the research trend of workplace safety education. Workplace safety education research has been carried out in earnest since the 2000s and research is being conducted to develop employees’ safety competency and improve organizations’ ability to respond to various crises.

Approaching safety education from the viewpoints of the humanities and sociology helps researchers and trainers better understand human beings as learners. Therefore, in future studies related to workplace safety education, it is necessary to consider variables and measurement tools that can improve and measure actual learning effects in addition to the concepts, factors, variables, and programs that have been studied thus far.

Workplace safety education is based on behaviorism theory and embodies cognitive theory, so it is important to correct individual attitudes and behaviors and continue to perform work safely. In addition, it was possible to identify risk factors in the workplace in advance and to understand how employees can develop safety capabilities in accordance with their particular job characteristics and positions. It was determined that the results of this study can be used as foundational data for research on safety competency development in the workplace to promote safety engagement during workplace engagement. It is also meaningful in that it showed the potential for further academic research through interdisciplinary research and big data analysis.

This study has a limitation in that it has not specifically developed a new theoretical model of workplace safety education. Therefore, through additional research, we intend to develop a theoretical model based on the topics and keywords derived from this study.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020S1A3A2A02091529).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by the the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020S1A3A2A02091529].

References

  • Al Thani, F. B. H., & Obeidat, A. M. (2020). The impact of strategic leadership on crisis management. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 10(6), 307–20. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2020.106.307.326
  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  • Barb, C. M., Moraru, R. I., & Dregan, C. V. (2021). Operational systemic model of occupational safety and health management intended to minimize electrical risks. Annals of the University of Petrosani Electrical Engineering, 23, 51–64.
  • Barling, J., Loughlin, C., & Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Development and Test of a Model Linking Safety-specific Transformational Leadership and Occupational Safety. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.488
  • Chmiel, N., Laurent, J., & Hansez, I. (2017). Employee perspectives on safety citizenship behaviors and safety violations. Safety Science, 93, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.014
  • Christian, M. S., & Slaughter, J. E. 2007. Work engagement: A meta-analytic review and directions for research in an emerging area. In Academy of Management Proceedings. New York: Briarcliff Manor Academy of Management, 1–6.
  • Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta‐analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x
  • Cooper, M. D. (2009). Behavioral safety interventions. Professional Safety, 54(2), 36–45.
  • Dembe, A. E. (2001). The social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 40(4), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.1113
  • DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  • Ennis, P. M. (2014). Lifelong learning. Professional Safety, 59(9), 8.
  • Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., & Orús, C. (2019). The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research, 100, 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050
  • Gao, Y., Gonzalez, V. A., & Yiu, T. W. (2019). The effectiveness of traditional tools and computer-aided technologies for health and safety training in the construction sector: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 138, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.003
  • Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649260091002
  • Goldenhar, L. M., Moran, S. K., & Colligan, M. (2001). Health and safety training in a sample of open-shop construction companies. Journal of Safety Research, 32(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(01)00045-7
  • Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  • Ha, J. T. (2019). A Study on the effectiveness of construction safety education through the AHP. Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, 15(4), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.15683/kosdi.2019.12.31.597
  • Hadikusumo, B. H. W., Jitwasinkul, B., & Memon, A. Q. (2017). Role of Organizational Factors Affecting Worker Safety Behavior: A Bayesian Belief Network Approach. Procedia Engineering, 171, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.319
  • Han, J. W., Lee, K. S., Park, C. S., & Sohn, Y. W. (2009). Linking organizational safety culture and individual safety attitude and motivation to pilot safety behavior: A multi-level analysis of the republic of KIorea air force air units and pilots. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 22(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.22.1.200902.109
  • Hanvold, T. N., Kines, P., Nykänen, M., Thomée, S., Holte, K. A., Vuori, J., Wærsted, M., & Veiersted, K. B. (2019). Occupational safety and health among young workers in the Nordic countries: A systematic literature review. Safety and Health at Work, 10(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.12.003
  • Haunschild, P. R., & Sullivan, B. N. (2002). Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 609–643. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094911
  • Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.170
  • Jeong, S. (2020). A study on the practical use of ICT for safety education specialists. Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, 16(3), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.15683/kosdi.2020.09.30.505
  • Kaldenberg, D. O., Becker, B. W., & Zvonkovic, A. (1995). Work and commitment among young professionals: A study of male and female dentists. Human Relations, 48(11), 1355–1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504801106
  • Kim, K. S., & Lee, B. K. (2021). A Study on the development of emotional intelligence program evaluation area for emotional safety education in construction sites. Journal of Disaster and Safety, 1, 24–34.
  • Kim, J., Lee, C., Lee, T. S., Lee, K., Kim, K., & Kim, H. C. (2020). Developing an agricultural safety and health training program based on ISD model. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 39(3), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.23840/agehrd.2007.39.3.69
  • Laberge, M., MacEachen, E., & Calvet, B. (2014). Why are occupational health and safety training approaches not effective? Understanding young worker learning processes using an ergonomic lens. Safety Science, 68, 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.012
  • Laurent, J., Chmiel, N., & Hansez, I. (2018). Jobs and safety: A social exchange perspective in explaining safety citizenship behaviors and safety violations. Safety Science, 110, 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.027
  • Laurent, J., Chmiel, N., & Hanseza, I. (2018). Jobs and safety: A social exchange perspective in explaining safety citizenship behaviors and safety violations. Safety Science, 110, 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.027
  • Lecours, A., & Therriault, P. Y. (2018). Preventive behaviour at work of vocational students. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2017.1410724
  • Lim, M. S., & Ahn, K. Y. (2014). The Relationship between job demands-resources and safety compliance, and the mediating effect of job burnout. Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science, 16(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2014.16.1.89
  • Littlejohn, A., Lukic, D., & Margaryan, A. (2014). Comparing safety culture and learning culture. Risk Management, 16(4), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2015.2
  • Loomis, D. P., Richardson, D. B., Wolf, S. H., Runyan, C. W., & Butts, J. D. (1997). Fatal occupational injuries in a southern state. American Journal of Epidemiology, 145(12), 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009071
  • Luijendijk, H. J. (2021). How to create PICO questions about diagnostic tests. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 26(4), 155–157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111676
  • Lukic, D., Margaryan, A., & Littlejohn, A. (2010). How organisations learn from safety incidents: A multifaceted problem. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(7), 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621011071109
  • Maslen, S. (2014). Learning to prevent disaster: An investigation into methods for building safety knowledge among new engineers to the Australian gas pipeline industry. Safety Science, 64, 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.027
  • Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2013). On industrial learning and training for the factories of the future: A conceptual, cognitive and technology framework. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(3), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0590-9
  • May, N. C., Batiz, E. C., & Martinez, R. M. (2019). Assessment of leadership behavior in occupational health and safety. Work, 63(3), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-192946
  • McFarland, D., Ramage, D., Chuang, J., Heer, J., Manning, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2013). Differentiating language usage through topic models. Poetics, 41(6), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.06.004
  • Meyer, O. A., Omdahl, M. K., & Makransky, G. (2019). Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: A media and methods experiment. Computers & Education, 140, 103603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103603
  • Michael, J. H., Evans, D. D., Jansen, K. J., & Haight, J. M. (2005). Management commitment to safety as organizational support: Relationships with non-safety outcomes in wood manufacturing employees. Journal of Safety Research, 36(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2005.03.002
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
  • Morillas, R. M., Rubio-Romero, J. C., & Fuertes, A. (2013). A comparative analysis of occupational health and safety risk prevention practices in Sweden and Spain. Journal of Safety Research, 47, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.08.005
  • Nam Kung, J. (2017). Program development and application for adult safety education. Korean Journal of Adult & Continuing Education Studies, 8(3), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.20512/kjace.2017.8.3.75
  • Nathai-Balkissoon, M. (2018). The Impact of an Occupational Safety and Health Module on University Students’ Safety Attitudes. The West Indian Journal of Engineering, 41(1), 94–101.
  • Nykänen, M., Puro, V., Tiikkaja, M., Kannisto, H., Lantto, E., & Simpura, F. (2020). Implementing and evaluating novel safety training methods for construction sector workers: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Safety Research, 75, 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.09.015
  • O’brien, H. L., Cairns, P., & Hall, M. (2018). A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 112, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004
  • O’connor, T., Flynn, M., Weinstock, D., & Zanoni, J. (2014). Occupational safety and health education and training for underserved populations. New Solutions, 24(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.2190/NS.24.1.d
  • Olson, R., Grosshuesch, A., Schmidt, S., Gray, M., & Wipfli, B. (2009). Observational learning and workplace safety: The effects of viewing the collective behavior of multiple social models on the use of personal protective equipment. Journal of Safety Research, 40(5), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2009.07.004
  • Park, H. G., & Kang, K. S. (2017). A Study on operational issues and status of certificate of basic osh training in construction. Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science, 19(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2017.19.1.53
  • Reed, D. B., & Claunch, D. T. (2017). Moving social work norms via theater for senior farmers. Journal of Safety Research, 60, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.11.002
  • Richardson, W. S., Wilson, M. C., Nishikawa, J., Richardson, W. S., Wilson, M. C., Nishikawa, J., & Hayward, R. S. A. (1995). The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions. ACP journal club, 123(3), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.7326/acpjc-1995-123-3-a12
  • Ripamonti, S. C., & Scaratti, G. (2015). Safety learning, organizational contradictions and the dynamics of safety practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(7), 530–560. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2014-0007
  • Seo, H. J., & Hong, A. J. (2020). A Systematic literature review of research trends in safety leadership. Journal of Korean Society and Safety, 36(6), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2020.35.6.61
  • Seo, H. J., & Hong, A. J. (2022). Safety engagement in the workplace: Text mining analysis. Safety, 8(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety8020024
  • Seok, J. J. (2018). An empirical study on education process improvement for effective job training of construction safety manager. Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science, 20(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2018.20.1.023
  • Seo, H. J., Kim, N. K., Son, M., & Hong, A. J. (2021). A study on the influence of electronic construction site safety managers’ job resources, job demands, and organizational commitment. Journal of Korean Society and Safety, 36(2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2021.36.2.39
  • Seo, H. J., Park, J. H., & Hong, A. J. (2022). A study on research trends in workplace safety education for elderly workers using topic modeling. Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.52758/kjle.2022.28.1.187
  • Seo, H. J., Park, G. M., Son, M., & Hong, A. J. (2021). Establishment of virtual-reality-based safety education and training system for safety engagement. Education Science, 11(12), 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120786
  • Sim, H. H., & Kang, K. S. (2017). A study on the death accident analysis of ladder and prevention measures for fall accidents. Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science, 19(4), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2017.19.4.95
  • Singh, K., Srivastav, S., Bhardwaj, A., Dixit, A., & Misra, S. (2020). Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Institution Experience. Indian Pediatrics, 57(7), 678–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-1899-2
  • Somerville, M., & Lloyd, A. (2006). Codified knowledge and embodied learning: The problem of safety training. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370600947538
  • Somerville, M., & Lloyd, A. (2007). Codified knowledge and embodied learning: The problem of safety training. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370600947538/
  • Son, J. W. (2014). Development of a student-centered learning tool for construction safety education in a virtual reality environment. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 14(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2014.14.1.029
  • Stemn, E., Bofinger, C., Cliff, D., & Hassall, M. E. (2018). Failure to learn from safety incidents: Status, challenges and opportunities. Safety Science, 101, 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.018
  • Stuart, A. (2014). A blended learning approach to safety training: Student experiences of safe work practices and safety culture. Safety Science, 62, 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.005
  • Wright, N., Hollohan, J., Pozniak, E., & Ruehlen, P. (2019). The development of the occupational health and safety profession in Canada. Safety Science, 117, 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.005
  • Xu, N., Ma, L., Liu, Q., Wang, L., & Deng, Y. (2021). An improved text mining approach to extract safety risk factors from construction accident reports. Safety Science, 138, 105216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105216
  • Yang, K. M., & Park, S. H. (2013). A study on development of vocational education program for safety manager. Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science, 15(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2013.15.2.31
  • Yap, K., & Choy, S. (2018). Learning and praxis for workplace safety. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(4), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-06-2017-0054
  • Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587
  • Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty Years of Safety Climate Research: Reflections and Future Directions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019