1,916
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MANAGEMENT

Psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior in the information communications and technology (ICT) sector: A moderated- mediation model

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2200599 | Received 07 Jul 2022, Accepted 03 Apr 2023, Published online: 16 Apr 2023

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the influence of psychological empowerment on job crafting. Moreover, it analyzed the relationship between job crafting and organizational citizenship behavior. In addition, conscientiousness was considered as a moderator between psychological empowerment and job crafting. Whereas the mediation effect of job crafting was examined among psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior. The data were gathered from the ICTs of Jordan and AMOS was used for analysis. The results highlighted that psychological empowerment can influence job crafting, which can lead to organizational citizenship behavior. Therefore, job crafting can significantly mediate the relationship between psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior. In addition, the findings revealed that conscientiousness being an important personality trait can moderate the relationship between psychological empowerment and job crafting. This research can be considered as a guideline for researchers and practitioners focusing on job crafting and organizational citizenship behavior. The focus of this research is merely on the employees of ICTs and it has considered only one personality trait i.e. conscientiousness. Therefore, future studies can emphasize any other sector and include other personality traits as moderators.

Public interest statement

This research has employed the quantitative research method to analyze the mediating role of job crafting between psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior of employees working in ICTs. Moreover, it examined the moderation of conscientiousness between psychological empowerment and job crafting. The results revealed that organizational citizenship behavior can be developed among employees by focusing on psychological ownership and job crafting.

1. Introduction

Job crafting (JC) is an activity that is spontaneously undertaken by employees to meet their preferences and needs in the workplace (Kira et al., Citation2010). Over the last two decades, the concept of JC gained much popularity, particularly after the research of Wrzesniewski and Dutton’s (Citation2001) who claimed the employees as the crafters of their own job. Further, they explained JC as “the physical and cognitive changes individuals make in the task or relational boundaries of their work” (p. 179). Niessen et al. (Citation2016) differentiated JC from other job design approaches and presented that instead of modification, shaping, and designing by organizations, JC is based on job designing by the individual job holder. The JC practices are volitional, noticeable, potentially intrinsic, self-targeted, and don’t require the approval of management (Bruning & Campion, Citation2018).

The concept of empowerment has great importance because it’s essentially required for competitiveness where business operations are being facilitated by information technology (IT) (Collins, Citation1995). The employees’ autonomous behavior in the organizational settings is linked with their psychological empowerment (PE) and sense of controlling the work (Spreitzer, Citation2008). Organ (Citation1988, p. 4) as “individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization”.

Prior studies have highlighted the relationship of PE on organizational commitment (Bani et al., Citation2014), organizational innovation (Nikpour, Citation2018), organizational support (Abdulrab et al., Citation2018), job satisfaction (George & Zakkariya, Citation2018), and many other employee attitudinal outcomes (Shah et al., Citation2019). The results of the majority of these studies are consistent with self-determination theory (SDT) which focuses on the role of an autonomous motivational orientation in increasing psychological development, health, and performance (Deci & Ryan, Citation2008). When the employees feel that their needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence are satisfied, they perform more proactive work behavior like JC (Parker et al., Citation2010). Similarly, Coehoorn (Citation2017) contends that JC behavior is undertaken more frequently by PE employees because they consider themselves more autonomous and competent. In addition, Kamdron and Randmann (Citation2022) highlighted PE is positively related to Job crafting.

PE can affect organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Turnipseed & VandeWaa, Citation2020). Shusha (Citation2014) gathered data from nurses working in Egyptian Medical Centers to analyze the relationship between JC and OCB. The nurses with JC behavior were found more efficient in exercising OCB. Conscientiousness being an important element of personality traits can lead to JC in psychologically empowered employees. Therefore, it’s important to analyze the moderation mechanism related to JC that how conscientiousness can mediate the relationship between PE and JC in the ICTs of Jordan which are always ignored.

The ICT sector is the fasting growing sector in Jordan’s economy as it is accounting for 3.8% of the gross domestic product with total annual revenue of more than 2.3 billion $. Despite of challenging economic environment in COVID-19 pandemic, this sector strengthened Jordan’s economy with a phenomenal growth of 6% (Country Commercial Guide, Citation2021). To support the ICT sector of Jordan, the Information Technology Association of Jordan (Intaj) came into being. Intaj considered skilled and qualified human resources as the essential asset in IT firms. Moreover, the main goal of the establishment of Intaj was to provide IT products and services from Jordan (Al Dalahmeh et al., Citation2021). ICTs are linked to the aspiration of community empowerment which entails different dimensions including building regional capacity, increasing social capital, and enhancing democracy (O’Neil, Citation2002). Therefore, this research has emphasized PE in the ICTs of Jordan.

In today’s business world, the developments in environmental conditions and information technologies are continuously enhancing and shaping organizational innovations which have changed the job designs in the working environment by making the tasks more complex for employees (Demerouti, Citation2014). In this scenario, to maintain competitiveness, the organizations are seeking for employees to develop proactive behaviors in their non-routine tasks besides merely emphasizing specific job requirements (Demerouti et al., Citation2015). This research has highlighted psychological empowerment as an important proactive behavior that can lead to job crafting and OCB. The first and foremost important objective of this study is to portray the behavioral factors of employees working in the ICTs of Jordan. The job of employees working in ICTs is very tough and there is an essential need of JC. Al Dalahmeh et al. (Citation2021) highlighted that the ICT sector requires highly skilled and talented employees. Besides quality work force/employees, there is essential requirement of strategies or behavioral approaches that can help in better job designing of employees. Among them, the most important strategy is PE which can lead to JC. Mat Aji et al. (Citation2010) showed that constructs of Zimmerman’s psychological empowerment theory contribute to the PE of telecentre users. However, there is little to know on how the employees of telecommunication companies can do JC and develop OCB. This research addressed this gap by analyzing how behavioral strategy contributes to a proactive behavioral approach. Therefore, this study is aimed to highlight the role of PE on JC under the moderating effect of conscientiousness that can strengthen the aforementioned relationship. In addition, it is also presented how PE can further lead to OCB with the mediation of JC.

The critical literature-based investigation and extensive research highlighted a research gap in analyzing how PE can enhance JC that can lead to OCB of employees working in ICTs of Jordan. Thus, this study is an attempt to bridge this gap by examining the relationship among the aforementioned variables. This research has answered the following questions:

  • Does psychological empowerment enhance job crafting?

  • Does job crafting lead to organizational citizenship behavior?

  • Does conscientiousness moderate the relationship between psychological empowerment and job crafting?

  • Does job crafting mediate the relationship between psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior?

2. Literature review

2.1. Psychological empowerment and job crafting

Spreitzer (Citation1995, Citation2008) explained PE as a psychological state based on four cognitions including impact, meaning, self-determination, and competence. It can be the ideal autonomous psychological state for enhancing the performance and well-being of employees (Matsuo, Citation2019). SDT contends that an autonomous motivational orientation clears the way for a process that helps in meeting psychological needs such as relatedness, competency, and autonomy for the improvement of psychological performance and health (Ryan & Deci, Citation2000). Many studies focusing to examine PE with proactive behaviors in work settings have used the SDT. Psychologically empowered employees consider themselves as more competitive ones who can design or shape their working environment and jobs in way to facilitate proactive work behavior (Parker et al., Citation2010; Spreitzer, Citation1995). JC is an important proactive behavior and Berg et al. (Citation2010) explained it as a behavior that required an adaptation to the constraints and challenges imposed by the employer for employees working in an organization. Even these changes or challenges are not in line with the organizational goals but still, JC can be a strategic advantage for organizations and especially the employees (Van den Heuvel et al., Citation2010). The mobilization of resources by employees through JC behaviors can enable them to develop a better working environment that is in line with their core abilities and meets their needs (Tims & Bakker, Citation2010).

JC is initiated by employees but it’s beneficial for both, the organizations and the employees (Hakanen et al., Citation2017) and it can be the outcome of PE. The relationship between PE and JC can be explained by SDT because JC is a proactive work behavior (Khan et al., Citation2021). In the lens of self-determination theory, human motivation is linked with three intrinsic psychological needs including competence, autonomy, and relatedness (Ryan & Deci, Citation2000) but one more important factor leading to motivation is psychological empowerment (Zimmerman, Citation1995). Prior studies have reported relation of PE with several other work-related outcomes, like organizational commitment (Joo & Shim, Citation2010), work engagement (Moura et al., Citation2015), organizational citizenship behavior (Turnipseed & VandeWaa, Citation2020), and job performance (Sun, Citation2016) but ignored the proactive behavioral approach (i.e. job crafting). According to Kamdron and Randmann (Citation2022), this PE is positively related to job crafting.

Only a few studies have actually analyzed the relationship of PE with JC in different work settings but up to the author’s knowledge, no research is available in context on ICTs in Jordan. Kilic et al. (Citation2020) also highlighted that there is a scarcity of literature about employees’ psychological empowerment on JC. The results of their highlighted that psychological empowerment can enhance job crafting behaviors. Similarly, Coehoorn (Citation2017) concluded that four-dimensional PE is related to SDT and work as an intrinsic motivator to lead job crafting. PE and job crafting are sequential mediators between servant leadership and innovative work behavior but still, psychological empowerment can lead to job crafting (Khan et al., Citation2021). Harbridge (Citation2018) highlighted the significant impact of PE on the JC of registered nurses working in public health in Canada. There is a paucity of literature highlighting the relationship between psychological empowerment and job crafting in the context of ICTs in Jordan. Therefore, the following hypothesis is developed:

H1:

Psychological empowerment is positively related to job crafting.

2.2. Job crafting and organizational citizenship behavior

Job crafting is one’s ability to manage his or her own resources, and it can reinforce OCB (Srivastava & Pathak, Citation2020). It can influence the satisfaction of employees (Cheng & Yi, Citation2018), well-being (Devotto et al., Citation2020), employee creativity (Tian et al., Citation2021), job performance (Zhang & Liu, Citation2021), and most importantly the OCB (Irvin, Citation2017). OCB can lead to cost reduction, productivity, customer satisfaction, and efficiency (N. P. Podsakoff et al., Citation2009). Shin and Hur (Citation2019) analyzed the relation of bosses and workers in the context of the Chinese manufacturing industry and the results of their study highlighted that job crafting can positively influence the OCB. Similarly, Nonnis et al. (Citation2020) found a positive effect of job crafting on organizational citizenship behavior. Shusha (Citation2014) examined the relationship of JC with OCB in Egyptian medical centers and highlighted that employees with JC would be more likely to engage in OCB. In addition, Irvin (Citation2017) indicated that there is significant positive relation among JC and OCB and creative self-efficiency can mediate this relationship. In comparison with the millennial generation, the workforce of earlier generations was more interested in organizational citizenship behavior but when the millennial initiate JC, they tend toward OCB. Therefore, the JC being a career development factor can influence the OCB (Gong et al., Citation2018). The literature has discussed the role of JC on OCB in different contexts but there is a paucity of studies in Jordan and particularly the ICTs. Thus, we posit that job crafting is positively related to the organizational citizenship behavior of employees working in ICT of Jordan, accordingly, we hypothesized that:

H2:

Job crafting is positively related to organizational citizenship behavior.

2.3. Psychological empowerment, job crafting, and organizational citizenship behavior

The practices of JC will lead to change the meaning of job and enforce beliefs of employees about the importance of their own work (Rosso et al., Citation2010). JC being a proactive and self-initiated factor can enhance the OCB in employees. The concept of OCB has gained a lot of attention among researchers and practitioners due to its wide implications towards enhancing the performance of employees (Becton et al., Citation2017; P. M. Podsakoff & MacKenzie, Citation1997). Many researchers have diverted their interest towards exploring the antecedents to OCB (Ding et al., Citation2020) and some of them have also identified its determinants such as emotional intelligence (Turnipseed, Citation2018), ethical leadership (Q. I. Yang & Wei, Citation2018), perceived organizational support (Thompson et al., Citation2020) and most important, the psychological empowerment (Turnipseed & VandeWaa, Citation2020).

In the lens of self-determination theory, JC is related to competence, relatedness, and autonomy. Job crafting can enable employees to redesign their jobs according to skills, values, and needs for enjoying and getting meaningful experience on the job (Wrzesniewski & Dutton, Citation2001). Mousa and Chaouali (Citation2022) highlighted that individual job crafting influences the meaningfulness of work, which can lead to affective commitment. Moreover, individual job crafting can enhance organizational inclusion (Mousa et al., Citation2022) which can lead to positive employee outcomes such as organizational commitment (Shore et al., Citation2011), psychological contract (Mousa, Citation2019), and organizational citizenship behavior. According to Spreitzer (Citation2008) psychological empowerment theory contends that self-empowered employees are more oriented toward their work. Therefore, in the context of this theory, we posit that psychological empowerment is positively related to job crafting and organizational citizenship behavior.

PE contains different task cognitions including the meaning of work, autonomy, influencing organizational outcomes, and self-efficacy. Due to these, OCB has the ability to influence JC (Kilic et al., Citation2020). Magdaleno et al. (Citation2022) highlighted the importance of JC of social resources as a mediator of OCB when employees have sufficient job autonomy. The deep analysis of literature indicated that studies have used JC as a mediator between the relationship of servant leadership and OCB (Bavik et al., Citation2017) and the relationship of humble leadership and OCB (Magdaleno et al., Citation2022) but ignored the mediation of JC between PE and OCB. There are two reasons behind considering the JC as a mediator between PE and OCB. First, in organizations, the self-initiated change behaviors of employees can be because of intentional involvement in the self-change process and self-motivation. Second, PE along with job crafting can lead to OCB. Thus, to investigate the mediating effect of job crafting between PE and OCB, the following hypothesis has been designed:

H3:

Job crafting mediates the relationship between psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior.

2.4. Conscientiousness as a moderator

Personality is a combination of traits of complex behavior which include temperament and unique emotions of individuals which vary from person to person (Jalal et al., Citation2019). In the model of Big Five personality traits, the personality is analyzed by several important dimensions that differentiate individuals from each other, these dimensions are agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experiences, and extroversion (Najari et al., Citation2011). These traits can improve the performance of employees and can be the most effective if targeted at OCB (Udin & Yuniawan, Citation2020). Organizational psychology has highlighted that conscientiousness is not really a single entity but it is a system of several special features (Roberts et al., Citation2009). Therefore, it is the most important trait of personality in predicting job performance (Wilmot & Ones, Citation2019) and JC (Liu et al., Citation2020).

Personality can strongly predict OCB and it has been analyzed by several studies that the big five personality traits can be influential to OCB (Mushraf et al., Citation2015; Patki & Abhyankar, Citation2016; Pletzer et al., Citation2021). Similarly, these traits can also enhance JC. Shusha (Citation2014) considered conscientiousness as the dimension of OCB and highlighted that job crafting is exercised by the employees having more conscientiousness. PE is the autonomous behavior and job crafting is also self-initiated proactive behavior, and conscientiousness can strengthen the relationship between PE and JC. In order to fill this gap in literature, we formulated following hypothesis:

H4:

Conscientiousness moderates the relationship between psychological empowerment and job crafting.

On the basis of the discussion and hypothesis shown above, the following conceptual framework is designed for this research (see figure ).

Figure 1. Measurement model.

Figure 1. Measurement model.

3. Methods & results

3.1. Population, sample, and respondents

Study population comprises employee of Information Communications and Technology (ICT) companies operating in Jordan. According to Jordanian commercial guide, in 2021, there are 900 active companies in the in the ICT sector and employing about 22,000 people. The study is quantitative and data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire. The team of authors and two research assistants conducted the field survey and contacted 377 ITC firms for permission to collect the data from their employees. Out of 377, 270 firms granted permission to collect data from their employees and 700 questionnaires were distributed, from which 445 valid responses were received. Therefore, a response rate of 63.5% was achieved. Convenient sampling technique was used to collect the data due to time and resource constraints, and it took 3 months in collecting the 445 successful responses.

The findings showed that there were 113 female and 332 male participants. The majority of them were having bachelor’s degree (i.e. 210) and experience of more than 5 years (138 employees). Type of ICT services and number of respondents are presented in Table . According to researchers’ best of knowledge and observations during data collection, the ratio of male and female employees in the ICT sector is 71:29. Furthermore, sample adequacy was tested using “Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s test”, and results are presented in Table . KMO index value 0.95 indicates excellent sampling adequacy as according to Hair et al. (Citation1998) recommended value of 0.80 or greater for KMO index.

Table 1. Type of ITC Services & Number of Respondents

Table 2. KMO and Bartlett’s Test

3.2. Measurements

A structured questionnaire was used to collect the research data, and questionnaire items were adopted from past valid studies. The construct of job crafting was measured with a 14-items measurement scale adopted from the study of Shusha (Citation2014). This is the most latest and relevant scale matching the context of this research. Instead of using JD-R model, this scale was used because job demands-resources (JD-R) theory is related to analyzing the impact of the organizational environment on the performance or well-being of employees (Tummers & Bakker, Citation2021). JD-R model consists the job crafting but it is associated with leadership behaviors such as servant leadership (R. Yang et al., Citation2017). This study has not mainly focused on organizational resources, thus scale of (Shusha, Citation2014) was most relevant.

Organizational citizenship behavior was measured with a 10-items scale that was adopted from the study of Dong and Phuong (Citation2018). A 12-items measurement scale was used to measure the construct of psychological empowerment, adopted from the study of Shah et al. (Citation2019). The construct of conscientiousness was measured with a 9-items measurement scale adopted from the study of John and Srivastava (Citation1999). All items were measured using 5-point Likert scale (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). Moreover, questionnaire face validity was also tested through expert opinion from three top level managers of ICT firms.

3.3. Data normality

Data normality was tested before proceeding for further analysis, and Kurtosis and Skewness values were tested to assess the data normality by following recommendations of Kline (Citation2015). Results presented in Table show values of Kurtosis (−1.16 ~ −0.66) and Skewness (−0.62 ~ 0.02), which satisfy Byrne’s (Citation2010) criteria for data normality (−7~+7 for Kurtosis and −3~+3 for Skewness).

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics

3.4. Factor analysis

Significant values of Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity validate the suitability of factor analysis as confirmed in Table . Factor analysis was conducted using AMOS-24 and results are shown in Table . Results indicate excellent items’ loading as all loading values are greater than 0.50 as recommended by Hair et al. (Citation2010). Moreover, all Cronbach alpha values are also greater than 0.70, which confirm construct reliability.

Table 4. Factor Analysis

3.5. Data validity and reliability

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using AMOS-24 was conducted to assess data reliability and validity. Results as shown in Table indicate that all CR (composite reliability) values are greater than 0.70 and AVE (average variance extracted) values are higher than 0.50 as recommended by Fornell and Larcker (Citation1981) for reliability and convergent validity. Moreover, results also show that all square root of AVE values are higher that the construct correlation values, which confirms discriminant validity as recommended by Anderson and Gerbing (Citation1988).

Table 5. Reliability and validity analysis

3.6. Measurement Model Fit

Prior to testing the hypothesized relationships, measurement model fitness was tested using CFA technique, and results are presented in Table . Results indicate poor model fit for 4-factor baseline model as all fit indices are well below the recommended fit criteria by Hu and Bentler (Citation1999). By following modification indices excellent model fitness was achieved (χ2/df = 1.90, IFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA =.05). Figure shows measurement model.

Table 6. Measurement model

3.7. Test of hypotheses

After achieving model fitness, hypothesized relationships were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) through AMOS-24, and results are shown in Table (direct & indirect effect) and Table (moderating effect). Results shown in Table show that there is significant effect of psychological empowerment on job crafting (B = 0.419, P < .001). Moreover, there is also positive and significant relationship between job crafting and OCB (B = 0.645, P < .001). Furthermore, results also confirm significant indirect effect of psychological empowerment on OCB through mediation of job crafting (B = 0.480, P < .001; CI = 0.392 ~ 0.577). As a result, hypotheses H1, H2, and H3 are accepted.

Table 7. Test of Hypotheses (Direct & Mediating Effect)

Table 8. Conditional Effects of the focal predictor (Psychological Empowerment) at values of the moderator (Conscientiousness)

Hayes process macro was used to test the moderation hypothesis. Significant interactions “for high and low mean ± SD values of the moderator” are plotted in Figure . Results indicate significant R2 change and F statistics (∆R2 = 0.008, F = 4.671), which confirm moderation of conscientiousness between the relationship of psychological empowerment and job crafting. Figure indicates the slop of relationships, which reveal that when there is low psychological empowerment and low conscientiousness there will be low job crafting, and in case of high psychological empowerment, the job crafting will be high. In the presence of high conscientiousness the relationship between psychological empowerment and job crafting will get stronger, as we have hypothesized in the study. Therefore, hypothesis H4 is also accepted and well supported by the study data.

Figure 2. Moderation Graph.

Figure 2. Moderation Graph.

4. Discussion

Information and communication technology (ICT) being the backbone of the digital economy can help in the productive growth and technological progress of an economy. It comprises different technologies and communication networks that build them. Moreover, ICT includes a wide range of new products and services ranging from highly advanced digital devices such as smarts machines (i.e. IOT), to new digital technologies (i.e. blockchain) and digital platforms including social networks and e-commerce (OECD, Citation2020). Anitha and Sundharavadivel (Citation2012) explained ICTs as a diverse set of resources and technological tools that can help in creating, disseminating, storing, bringing value-addition, and managing the information. The ICT sector is very broad and it consists of different diverse segments including radio and television broadcasting, electronic media, software, computer hardware, and telecommunications. Therefore, this sector always requires highly talented and skilled employees (Al Dalahmeh et al., Citation2021) who should possess organizational citizenship behavior. Thus, it’s important to highlight the factors which can develop the organizational citizenship behavior among employees.

The current study has emphasized the power of PE and its influence on different job outcomes of employees working in ICTs of Jordan. It has provided a significant contribution to the theoretical and empirical literature on psychological empowerment, conscientiousness, job crafting, and OCB. Firstly, the study has highlighted the influence of PE on JC. Secondly, it examined the role of JC on OCB. Thirdly, the research has focused on Zimmerman’s psychological empowerment theory instead of relying on the self-determination theory for the conceptualization of the PE and job-related factors associated with it. Fourthly, it discussed the mediating role of job crafting between PE and OCB. Fifthly, the moderation of conscientiousness was discussed between PE and JC.

The first and foremost important hypothesis of study H1 was developed to analyze the relationship between PE and JC. This positivity highlights that PE can lead to JC behavior. There is a paucity of literature highlighting the role of employees’ psychological empowerment on JC (Kilic et al., Citation2020) and this research is first in the context of ICT sector to explain the role of PE on JC. The findings of H1, confirmed that among employees ICTs of Jordan, the JC is linked with the autonomous behavior (i.e. psychological empowerment. The psychologically empowered employees will possess the job crafting behavior. Similarly, Harbridge (Citation2018) supported these results by indicating the significant impact of PE on JC. Job crafting can further lead to the OCB of employees. Therefore, the second hypothesis H2 was formulated to highlight the role of JC on OCB. The application of OCB in the working environment can enhance the performance of employees, units, and organizations (Chien, Citation2003). The results highlighted the significance of studying JC with reference to OCB and revealed the positive relationship between JC and OCB. Nonnis et al. (Citation2020); Irvin (Citation2017) also highlighted the positive effect of JC on the OCB of employees.

The third hypothesis of this study, H3 aimed to highlight the mediating role of JC between PE and OCB. PE is considered as a self-initiated or autonomous change in the behavior of employees and this change can lead to JC which further enhances the OCB of employees. Therefore, the results for H3, revealed that JC significantly mediates the relationship between PE and OCB. Similarly, Irvin (Citation2017) explained that the employees who tailor their work to fit them personally can effectively and efficiently achieve their goals. This behavior allows the employee to perform better for the organization. This research has claimed that besides PE, Hakanen et al. (Citation2017) JC is also self-initiated and beneficial for employees and as well organizations. The presence of JC can better explain the relation of PE with OCB. The last objective of this research is to analyze the moderating role of conscientiousness between PE and JC; to examine these results, H4 was developed. The results revealed that the personality trait of conscientiousness can strengthen the relation of PE with JC. The performance related to a job is linked with personality traits (Wilmot & Ones, Citation2019) and this study has highlighted that the personality trait of conscientiousness can lead to JC. Shusha (Citation2014) utilized conscientiousness as the dimension of OCB and indicated that employees having more JC will have more conscientiousness. Whereas current research has explained conscientiousness as an important determinant of personality.

5. Implications

The field of human resource management is diverse and many researchers in this domain have focused on autonomous behavior. According to Spreitzer (Citation2008), this behavior is linked with PE. This research has highlighted SE as an essential factor to JC which can lead to OCB. Thus, the study has provided extensive implications for academicians and practitioners. Theoretically, this study has diverted the attention of researchers toward an important issue of OCB and JC which can be generated by PE. In addition, it has contributed a lot to the literature on PE, conscientiousness, JC, and OCB. Prior studies have considered conscientiousness as a dimension of JC but this research has taken it as an important element of personality trait.

This research is very unique in its context and it has provided several practical implications. It has directed the attention of managers of ICTs toward understanding the importance of psychological empowerment and job crafting for developing organizational citizenship behavior. This study is very critical in the development of employees of ICTs, as the results revealed by it can help in improving the manager’s understanding related to the factors affecting organizational citizenship behavior. By investigating and understanding these factors, the managers of ICTs can develop effective strategies to enhance the OCB among their employees. The managers should have knowledge about the level of employees’ organizational citizenship behavior and the factors that can influence it. Thus, the findings of this study have implications for ICTs managers who want to increase the organizational citizenship behavior of employees within the organization. The results suggest that psychological empowerment, conscientiousness, and job crafting are the factors that can enhance the organizational citizenship behavior of employees working in ICTs. Therefore, the practitioners facing the issue of lack of OCB within their organizations can focus on the findings of this research and work on PE and JC.

6. Limitations & Recommendations

This study has focused on the broad areas but still, it has different limitations which can be considered by future researchers. First, the research has only focused on the ICTs of Jordan, and future studies can emphasize the other sectors, particularly tourism. Second, the only one personality trait (i.e. conscientiousness) was taken as moderating and the studies in the future can use the other important personality traits.

7. Conclusion

Autonomous behaviors are difficult to understand, particularly in the organizational context but this research has emphasized the most important behavior (i.e. psychological empowerment) and its influence on job crafting. Moreover, the relationship between job crafting and organizational citizenship behavior was examined. The ultimate objective of this research is the development of OCB among ICTs employees. Therefore, first this study has examined the moderating role of conscientiousness in the relationship of PE and JC. Secondly, it analyzed the role of JC as a mediator between PE and OCB. The results highlighted that JC and psychological ownership both are necessary for the development of organizational citizenship behavior among employees.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by the Al-Hussein Bin Talal University-Deanship of Scientific Research and Postgraduate Studies [125/2023].

References

  • Abdulrab, M., Zumrah, A. R., Almaamari, Q., Al-Tahitah, A. N., Isaac, O., & Ameen, A. (2018). The role of psychological empowerment as a mediating variable between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behaviour in Malaysian higher education institutions. International Journal of Management and Human Science, 2(3), 1–19.
  • Al Dalahmeh, M., Héder-Rima, M. (2021). The effect of talent management practices on employee turnover intention in the information and communication technologies (ICTs) sector: Case of Jordan, 18(4), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.06
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Anitha, L., & Sundharavadivel, D. (2012). Information and communication technology (ICT) and women empowerment. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 1(4), 143–152.
  • Bani, M., Yasoureini, M., & Mesgarpour, A. (2014). A study on relationship between employees’ psychological empowerment and organizational commitment. Management Science Letters, 4(6), 1197–1200. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2014.5.007
  • Bavik, A., Bavik, Y. L., & Tang, P. M. (2017). Servant leadership, employee job crafting, and citizenship behaviors: A cross-level investigation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(4), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965517719282
  • Becton, J. B., Carr, J. C., Mossholder, K. W., & Walker, H. J. (2017). Differential effects of task performance, organizational citizenship behavior, and job complexity on voluntary turnover. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9461-x
  • Berg, J. M., Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2010). Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.645
  • Bruning, P. F., & Campion, M. A. (2018). A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: A multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 499–522. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0604
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications series). Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Cheng, J. C., & Yi, O. (2018). Hotel employee job crafting, burnout, and satisfaction: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.005
  • Chien, M. H. (2003). A study to improve organizational citizenship behaviors. In MODSIM 2003 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Integrative Modelling of Biophysical, Social, and Economic Systems for Resource Management Solutions (Vol. 14, pp. 1364–1367). Townsville. https://www.mssanz.org.au/MODSIM03/Volume_03B
  • Coehoorn, E. (2017). The mediating role of job crafting in the relationship between psychological empowerment and employee performance. Work Design, http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=144720.
  • Collins, D. (1995). Rooting for empowerment? Empowerment in Organizations, 5(4), 202–212.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
  • Demerouti, E. (2014). Design your own job through job crafting. European Psychologist, 19(4), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000188
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Gevers, J. M. (2015). Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001
  • Devotto, R., Freitas, C. P., & Wechsler, S. M. (2020). The role of job crafting on the promotion of flow and wellbeing. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 21(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramd200113
  • Ding, H., Yu, E., Chu, X., Li, Y., & Amin, K. (2020). Humble leadership affects organizational citizenship behavior: The sequential mediating effect of strengths use and job crafting. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(65), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00065
  • Dong, L. N. T., & Phuong, N. N. D. (2018). Organizational justice, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior in higher education institutions: A research proposition in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(3), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no3.113
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • George, E., & Zakkariya, K. A. (2018). Psychological empowerment and job satisfaction in the banking sector. Psychological Empowerment and Job Satisfaction in the Banking Sector. Springer.
  • Gong, B., Greenwood, R. A., Hoyte, D., Ramkissoon, A., & He, X. (2018). Millennials and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of job crafting and career anchor on service. Management Research Review, 41(7), 774–778. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2016-0121
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 207–219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.
  • Hakanen, J. J., Seppälä, P., & Peeters, M. C. (2017). High job demands, still engaged and not burned out? The role of job crafting. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24(4), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9638-3
  • Harbridge, R. R. (2018). Psychological Empowerment and Job Crafting among Registered Nurses Working in Public Health in Ontario, Canada. Central Michigan University.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Irvin, R. (2017). Job crafting and organizational citizenship behavior: Believing in your creative ability to better your job and organization (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University).
  • Jalal, R. N., Zeb, N., & Fayyaz, U. E. (2019). The effect of personality traits on employee job satisfaction with moderating role of Islamic work ethics. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no2.161
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2(1999), 102–138.
  • Joo, B. K., & Shim, J. H. (2010). Psychological empowerment and organizational commitment: The moderating effect of organizational learning culture. Human Resource Development International, 13(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2010.501963
  • Jordan - Country Commercial Guide. (2021, October 25). Information and Communication Technology. Retrieved April 12, 2022 , from https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/jordan-information-and-communication-technology
  • Kamdron, T., & Randmann, L. (2022). Relationships between psychological empowerment and job crafting: The mediating role of job involvement. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 22(2), 31–46.
  • Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., Islam, T., Rehman, A., Ahmed, S. S., Khan, E., & Sohail, F. (2021). How servant leadership triggers innovative work behavior: Exploring the sequential mediating role of psychological empowerment and job crafting. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2020-0367
  • Kilic, E., Tatar, B., & Erdil, O. (2020). A research on the relationship between job crafting, Psychological empowerment and turnover intention. Journal of Yaşar University, 15(Special Issue), 192–200.
  • Kira, M., van Eijnatten, F. M., & Balkin, D. B. (2010). Crafting sustainable work: Development of personal resources. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(5), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811011071315
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
  • Liu, X., Yu, T., & Wan, W. (2020). Stick to convention or bring forth the new? Research on the relationship between employee conscientiousness and job crafting. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01038
  • Magdaleno, J., Caballer, A., Sora, B., García-Buades, M. E., & Rodríguez, I. (2022). The Mediating role of job crafting of social resources in the relationship between job autonomy, self-efficacy, and organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34(1)1–16.
  • Mat Aji, Z., Mohd Affendi, S. A., Sheik Osman, W. R., & Yusop, N. I. (2010). A conceptual model for psychological empowerment of telecentre users. Computer and Information Science, 3(3), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.5539/cis.v3n3p71
  • Matsuo, M. (2019). Personal growth initiative as a predictor of psychological empowerment: The mediating role of job crafting. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21347
  • Moura, D., Orgambídez-Ramos, A., & de Jesus, S. N. (2015). Psychological empowerment and work engagement as predictors of work satisfaction: A sample of hotel employees. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 3(2), 125–134.
  • Mousa, M. (2019). Organizational inclusion and academics’ psychological contract: Can responsible leadership mediate the relationship? Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 39(2), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-01-2019-0014
  • Mousa, M., & Chaouali, W. (2022). Job crafting, meaningfulness and affective commitment by gig workers towards crowdsourcing platforms. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2021-0495
  • Mousa, M., Chaouali, W., & Mahmood, M. (2022). The inclusion of gig employees and their career satisfaction: Do individual and collaborative job crafting play a role? Public Organization Review, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00596-4
  • Mushraf, A. M., Al-Saqry, R., & Obaid, H. J. (2015). The impact of big five personality factors on organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Management Science, 2(5), 93–97.
  • Najari, R., Ahmadi, F., & Habibitabar, Z. (2011). Study of relationship between personality and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in public organizations in Iran. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(2), 472–483.
  • Niessen, C., Weseler, D., & Kostova, P. (2016). When and why do individuals craft their jobs? The role of individual motivation and work characteristics for job crafting. Human Relations, 69(6), 1287–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715610642
  • Nikpour, A. (2018). Psychological empowerment and organizational innovation: Mediating role of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 7(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2018.60421
  • Nonnis, M., Massidda, D., Cabiddu, C., Cuccu, S., Pedditzi, M. L., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Motivation to donate, job crafting, and organizational citizenship behavior in blood collection volunteers in non-profit organizations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 934–950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030934
  • OECD. (2020). A roadmap toward a common framework for measuring the digital economy. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/roadmap-toward-a-common-framework-for-measuring-the-digital-economy.pdf.
  • O’Neill, O. (2002). Reith lectures 2002: A question of trust. Lecture 4: Trust and transparency. BBC Reith Lect. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2002/4.shtml
  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington Books.
  • Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
  • Patki, S. M., & Abhyankar, S. C. (2016). Big-five personality factors as predictors of organizational citizenship behavior: A complex interplay. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.25215/0302.168
  • Pletzer, J. L., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2021). HEXACO personality and organizational citizenship behavior: A domain-and facet-level meta-analysis. Human Performance, 34(2), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.1891072
  • Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079
  • Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., & Meints, J. (2009). Conscientiousness.In Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. The Guilford Press.
  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Shah, T. A., Khattak, M. N., Zolin, R., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2019). Psychological empowerment and employee attitudinal outcomes: The pivotal role of psychological capital. Management Research Review, 42(7), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2018-0194
  • Shin, Y., & Hur, W. M. (2019). Linking flight attendants’ job crafting and OCB from a JD-R perspective: A daily analysis of the mediation of job resources and demands. Journal of Air Transport Management, 79, 101681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101681
  • Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943
  • Shusha, A. (2014). The effects of job crafting on organizational citizenship behavior: Evidence from Egyptian medical centers. International Business Research, 7(6), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v7n6p140
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
  • Spreitzer, G. (2008). Taking Stock: A Review of More Than Twenty Years of Research on Empowerment at Work1. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Volume One: Micro Approaches, 1, 54–72.
  • Srivastava, S., & Pathak, D. (2020). The role of moderators in linking job crafting to organizational citizenship behaviour: A study on the indian hospitality sector. Vision, 24(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919869747
  • Sun, X. (2016). Psychological empowerment on job performance—mediating effect of job satisfaction. Psychology, 7(04), 584. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.74060
  • Thompson, P. S., Bergeron, D. M., & Bolino, M. C. (2020). No obligation? How gender influences the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(11), 1338. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000481
  • Tian, W., Wang, H., & Rispens, S. (2021). How and when job crafting relates to employee creativity: The important roles of work engagement and perceived work group status diversity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010291
  • Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841
  • Tummers, L. G., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Leadership and job demands-resources theory: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722080
  • Turnipseed, D. L. (2018). Emotional intelligence and OCB: The moderating role of work locus of control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1346582
  • Turnipseed, D. L., & VandeWaa, E. A. (2020). The little engine that could: The impact of psychological empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 23(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-06-2019-0077
  • Udin, U., & Yuniawan, A. (2020). Psychological capital, personality traits of big-five, organizational citizenship behavior, and task performance: Testing their relationships. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.781
  • Van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2010). Personal.
  • Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2019). A century of research on conscientiousness at work. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(46), 23004–23010.
  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/259118
  • Yang, R., Ming, Y., Ma, J., & Huo, R. (2017). How do servant leaders promote engagement? A bottom-up perspective of job crafting. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(11), 1815–1827. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6704
  • Yang, Q. I., & Wei, H. (2018). The impact of ethical leadership on organizational citizenship behavior: The moderating role of workplace ostracism. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2016-0313
  • Zhang, C., & Liu, L. (2021). The effect of job crafting to job performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1762517
  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983