608
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Mixed Method Evaluation of a Culturally Adapted, Brief, Bullying Bystander Intervention for Middle School Students

, , , &
 

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed method study was to examine the appropriateness of a brief, bullying bystander intervention (STAC) adapted for a middle school in a low-income, rural community with a predominantly White and Hispanic student body. We were also interested in understanding the experiences of the students who participated in the intervention. Quantitative analysis suggested that students gained knowledge about bullying, increased their confidence to intervene in bullying situations, and used the STAC strategies to intervene in bullying behavior. Analyzing the qualitative data using Consensual Qualitative Research methodology ([CQR] Hill et al.) revealed four domains in which students (a) reported using the STAC strategies across multiple contexts and settings, (b) spoke about fears related to intervening in bullying, yet intervened despite those fears, (c) described emotional benefits experienced after participating in the intervention and while using the STAC strategies, and (d) reported stronger interpersonal relationship after participating in the STAC intervention. This study extends the literature by providing preliminary support for a brief, bystander intervention adapted to address the need for culturally relevant bullying interventions for low-income, rural, ethnically-blended schools.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Emily Voorhees for assistance with participant recruitment and Luis Aguilar, Jen Dalling, Kathleen Jawish, Sherise Porchia, Michelle Tassinari, Corina Sanchez, Dynisha Smith, Nicole Thompson, and April Watts for helping to train students.

Disclosure statement

Aida Midgett has a contractual agreement with Boise State that if the copyrighted STAC training sells, she receives a portion of the royalties.  Although the fee for training is $250, generally, the fee is waived.

Additional information

Funding

Research reported in this manuscript was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number [1U54GM104944]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.