197
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Preference for directive versus participative leadership: the role of regulatory mode and context quality definition

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 290-314 | Received 15 Dec 2020, Accepted 29 Oct 2021, Published online: 20 Dec 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Prior work showed that leadership preferences depend not only on followers’ characteristics, but also on contextual features. We investigated how regulatory mode (assessment – a concern with “getting things right” vs. locomotion – a concern with “getting things done” in goal pursuit) and the definition of quality criteria (i.e. whether or not there are predefined standards to evaluate task or work performance) jointly influence followers’ preferences for directive and participative leadership. We measured (Study 1, N = 503) and experimentally induced (Study 2, N = 497) followers’ regulatory mode before presenting them with task instructions that either clearly defined quality criteria or left them undefined. In both studies, participants were led to believe that they would work on a task with a supervising leader and indicated their preferred leader style for the task. Contrary to predictions, results do not suggest that the definition of quality criteria moderates the influence of followers’ regulatory mode on their leadership preferences. Independent of quality criteria conditions, both chronic assessment and locomotion predicted preferences for directive leadership; additionally, chronic locomotion strongly predicted preferences for participative leadership. However, the induced regulatory mode did not influence leadership preferences. Further work is needed to better understand the role of context in self-regulatory dynamics and leadership style preferences.

Disclosure statement

Authors do not have any conflict of interest to report.

Additional information

Funding

The data collection for this research was funded by a European Association of Social Psychology (EASP) pre-registered research grant and by the funds of FSR2020 grant of to Karl-Andrew Woltin; Université Catholique de Louvain[FSR grant].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.