116
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Catheter-obtained, Enterococcus and Proteus positive urine cultures may represent mostly contamination or asymptomatic bacteriuria in infants <90 days

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 332-339 | Received 24 Jun 2020, Accepted 29 Jan 2021, Published online: 23 Feb 2021
 

Abstract

Background

Urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnosis in infants is often made by a positive urine culture result, regardless of urine dipstick findings.

Aim

To assess parameters that may affect positive urine culture results interpretation in infants, including dipstick performance, obtainment method, bacteria type, age and laboratory results.

Methods

A retrospective, cohort study. Infants <90 days with urine dipstick and culture obtained through subrapubic aspiration (SPA) or catheter, 2015–2016, were included.

Results

Overall, 19% (129/678) of cultures were positive. The dipstick sensitivity was 51% for all cultures; 66%, 47%, 15% and 10% for Escherichia coli (n= 71), Klebsiella (n= 19), Enterococcus (n= 34) and Proteus (n= 10), respectively (p<.001). Sensitivity was higher in SPA vs. catheter for all cultures (67% vs. 43%); E. coli (78% vs. 59%); and Klebsiella (88% vs. 18%). For Enterococcus, dipstick sensitivity was low in both SPA and catheter (0–16%). All Proteus episodes were catheter obtained. Positive culture with negative dipstick and Enterococcus episodes had lower C-reactive protein levels, and higher proportion of mixed infection compared with positive dipstick and E. coli episodes.

Conclusions

Urine cultures in infants should be obtained by SPA, since catheter-obtained, Enterococcus and Proteus positive cultures may represent contamination or asymptomatic bacteriuria, rather than true UTI.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.