2,513
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Sea lice (Copepoda: Caligidae) parasitic on fishes reported from the Neotropical region

, &
Pages 141-150 | Received 18 Mar 2016, Accepted 10 Sep 2016, Published online: 29 Sep 2016

Abstract

The Caligidae, also known as sea lice, is a family of parasitic copepods of fish that consists of 31 genera and more than 450 species, some of which have been deleterious to cultured fish. The goal of this paper was to structure a list of sea lice species known from the Neotropical region based on information from published records. A total of 115 sea lice species found on 217 fish species were listed, including 58 species of Caligus and 22 of Lepeophtheirus. It seems that the inventory of this group of parasites is far from complete. Considering the promotion of finfish sea-cage aquaculture throughout the coastal areas of Latin America, a better understanding of the sea lice biodiversity will support systematic work on parasitic copepods in the Neotropics and will provide fundamental information that could impact fish disease control and prevention strategies.

Introduction

Parasitic copepods are some of the most frequently encountered taxa parasitizing marine fish.[Citation1] Of the 30 families of copepods that parasitize marine fish, members of Caligidae Burmeister, 1835 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) are the most common.[Citation1] The Caligidae includes 31 genera and 487 species mainly distributed in the genera Caligus Müller, 1785 (250) and Lepeophtheirus von Nordmann, 1832 (121); the other genera are Abasia Wilson, 1908 (6), Alanlewisia Boxshall, 2008 (1), Alebion Krøyer, 1863 (8), Anchicaligus Stebbing, 1900 (1), Anuretes Heller, 1865 (20), Arrama Dojiri & Cressey, 1991 (2), Avitocaligus Boxshall & Justine, 2005 (2), Belizia Cressey, 1990 (1), Caligodes Heller, 1865 (4), Caritus Cressey, 1967 (2), Dartevellia Brian, 1939 (1), Echetus Krøyer, 1863 (1), Euryphorus Milne Edwards, 1840 (3), Gloiopotes Steenstrup & Lütken, 1861 (5), Hermilius Heller, 1865 (8), Kabataella Prabha & Pillai, 1983 (1), Mappates Rangnekar, 1958 (2), Markevichus Özdikmen, 2008 (1), Metacaligus (Thomsen, 1949) (5), Paralebion Wilson, 1911 (4), Parapetalus Steenstrup & Lütken, 1861 (8), Parechetus Pillai, 1962 (1), Pseudanuretes Yamaguti, 1936 (9), Pseudechetus Prabha & Pillai, 1979 (1), Pupulina Van Beneden, 1892 (5), Sciaenophilus Van Beneden, 1852 (3), Sinocaligus Shen, 1957 (4), Synestius Steenstrup & Lütken, 1861 (1), and Tuxophorus Wilson, 1908 (6).[Citation2]

Members of the Caligidae are commonly known as ‘sea lice’. Apparently, these parasites are not deleterious for wild fish; however, some species have caused serious problems to fish cultured in marine or brackish water. Lepeophtheirus salmonis Krøyer, 1837 and Caligus rogercresseyi Boxshall & Bravo, 2000 have largely affected the salmonid farming industry in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively.[Citation3] Caligus epidemicus Hewitt, 1971 is a pathogenic parasite in finfish aquaculture in the Indo-West region.[Citation4] Caligus chiastos Lin & Ho, 2003 has caused health problems in the southern Bluefin tuna farming in Australia.[Citation5] Thus, an appropriate knowledge about the biodiversity as well as the biology and ecology of this group of parasites may be suitable in Latin American regions where marine finfish aquaculture is gaining popularity.

In Neotropical marine fishes, copepods represent the second largest parasitic group.[Citation6] However, the description of sea lice biodiversity has been given at slow pace, with isolate records of known species or descriptions of new species. In some cases, it may be difficult to access to scattered, past literature. Therefore, in the present work we provide a list of sea lice species that parasitize fish from the Neotropical region (Caribbean, Central and South America) as reference point for further studies into taxonomy, ecology, and other aspects of this interesting group of parasites.

Material and methods

The list of species herein presented is updated until March 2015, and contains records found in previous literature which was gathered by browsing in Zoological Record, Google Scholar and Scopus using search terms ‘Caligidae’, ‘caligid’, ‘Caligus’, ‘Lepeophtheirus’, ‘sea lice’, ‘parasitic copepod’, ‘parasitic crustacean’, combined with the name of a particular geographical region (e.g. ‘Neotropics’, ‘Brazil’, ‘Colombia’, ‘Ecuador’, ‘Eastern Pacific’), including the Spanish translation of these terms. Records in Ho & Lin’s book were also checked.[Citation7] Genera and species are ordered alphabetically following the classification and systematics of Walter & Boxshall.[Citation2] For each sea lice species, the name, authority, fish host species, locality and references are presented. Fish names follow FishBase.[Citation8]

Results

In the present work, 115 species (including 19 unidentified species) of sea lice (Appendix 1) found on 217 fish species are listed. Of these, 58 are known species of Caligus and 22 of Lepeophtheirus. The remaining species are distributed in nine genera (Alebion, Anuretes, Caligodes, Euryphorus, Gloiopotes, Lepeophtheirus, Metacaligus, Parapetalus and Tuxophorus). The sea lice species with the widest host range were Caligus mutabilis Wilson, 1905, C. productus Dana, 1852, and C. rufimaculatus Wilson, 1905 from 32, 26 and 20 fish host species, respectively. The last species in addition to Caligus evelynae Suárez-Morales, Camisotti & Martín, 2012, C. tetrodontis Barnard, 1948, C. undulatus Shen & Li, 1959, and Lepeophtheirus alvaroi Suárez-Morales & Gasca, 2012 have been also found freely swimming.

The sea lice species with the widest geographical distribution were C. productus recorded from Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Gulf of Mexico, Mexican Pacific, Panama and Venezuela; Caligus bonito Wilson, 1905 from Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Gulf of Mexico, Mexican Pacific, Panama, Peru and Venezuela; and Caligus coryphaenae Streenstrup & Lütken, 1861 from Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela.

The fish host species harbouring more sea lice species were Lutjanus argentiventris (8), Caranx caballus (7), and Scomberomorus sp. (7). Mexico, Brazil, and Chile were the countries with the major number of records of sea lice species (48, 36, and 23 species, respectively).

Discussion

According to the list provided in this paper, Caligus is currently the dominant caligid genus found in Neotropical marine and brackish water fishes. It is in agreement with the fact that species of Caligus are mostly found on warm water fishes in contrast with Lepeophtheirus diversity which tends to be low in tropical areas.[Citation7,9] As far as we know, specific evolutionary or ecological mechanisms underlying this dominance of Caligus are not well understood. Morphologically, species of both genera are similar, the main distinguishing feature is the pair of lunules (sucker-like supplementary attachment organs on the frontal plates) present in Caligus and absent in Lepeophtheirus.[Citation10,11] However, lunules are also present in other genera of the Caligidae. There is some evidence pointing out that species of Caligus are more active swimmers and transfer more frequently between hosts than species of Lepeophtheirus (see discussion in [Citation12]). Such swimming ability would enable diversification in species of Caligus driven by dispersal and host-switching. According to Hoberg and Brooks [Citation13], in Earth’s history, the major radiations in host-parasite assemblages have been preceded by ecological disruption, ecological breakdown and host-switching.

Even though sea lice are generally host specific, there are some species able to parasitize various hosts.[Citation10] In the Neotropics, C. mutabilis appears to have the widest host range, including Atlantic and Pacific hosts. This species was originally described by Wilson in 1905,[Citation14] and then redescribed by Cressey and Cressey [Citation15]. It seems that C. mutabilis has intraspecific variation at least in the shape of the genital complex [Citation14] and the length of the setae on the exopod of leg four,[Citation15] but this issue has not been clearly addressed. In a recent phylogenetic analysis of sea lice species based on mtDNA sequences,[Citation16] the group formed by C. mutabilis isolates showed a relatively high intraspecific genetic divergence. Therefore, it is necessary to perform a study to determine the extent of morphological and genetic variation within this species.

The present report includes sea lice species that have been found free-swimming. The occurrence of adults and juvenile stages of caligiform copepods in plankton samples has not been rare. There are species (e.g. C. undulatus) with a wide geographical distribution and that have yet to be reported from a fish host.[Citation17]

The large geographical range reached by some sea lice species (i.e. C. productus, C. bonito, and C. coryphaenae) in the Neotropics is comprehensible considering that some of their fish hosts (e.g. Coryphaena hippurus, Katsuwonus pelamis, Mugil cephalus, Thunnus albacares and Thunnus obesus) are distributed in tropical and subtropical seas throughout the world.

The present work, to some extent, provides evidence of the limited knowledge on the sea lice biodiversity in several Latin American countries. The number of species could be significantly higher than reported herein. For instance, a recent survey performed in one single locality of Ecuador uncovered 22 species of Caligus and 5 of Lepeophtheirus, most of which were new records to this country.[Citation18] This situation is not only true for parasitic copepods. According to Luque and Poulin [Citation6], our knowledge of the parasite biodiversity of Latin American fishes is in its infancy, the distribution of the study effort has been quite heterogeneous and the majority of known fish species have not been examined for parasites. The threat of sea lice for farmed fish should not be minimized. In terms of aquaculture and fish health, the appropriate knowledge of the parasite fauna could be useful to improve diagnosis, control and management of parasitic diseases, as well as more detailed research in the future.

Associate Editor: Juan Manuel Guayasamin.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • Boxshall GA. Copepoda (copepods). In: Rohde K, editor. Marine parasitology. Wallingford, (CT)/Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing/CABI; 2015. p. 123–138.
  • Walter TC, Caligidae BG. Caligidae Burmeister, 1835; 2008. In: Walter TC, Boxshall G, editors. World of copepods database; 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 2]. Available from: http://www.marinespecies.org/copepoda
  • Costello MJ. The global economic cost of sea lice to the salmonid farming industry. J. Fish Dis. 2009;32:115–118.10.1111/jfd.2009.32.issue-1
  • Nagasawa K. Caligus epidemicus (Copepoda: Caligidae), a pathogenic sea louse of wild and captive fish in Indo-West Pacific region: a review. Bull. Hiroshima Univ. Mus. 2013;5:71–86.
  • Hayward CJ, Aiken HM, Nowak BF. An epizootic of Caligus chiastos on farmed southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) off South Australia. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2008;79:57–63.10.3354/dao01890
  • Luque JL, Poulin R. Metazoan parasite species richness in Neotropical fishes: hotspots and the geography of biodiversity. Parasitology. 2007;134:865–878.10.1017/S0031182007002272
  • Ho J-S, Lin C-L. Sea lice of Taiwan (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Caligidae). Keelung: The Sueichan Press; 2004.
  • Froese R, Pauly D. FishBase; 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 4]. Available from: www.fishbase.org
  • Suárez-Morales E, Gasca R. A new Lepeophtheirus (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Caligidae) from Isla del Coco National Park, Costa Rica, Eastern Tropical Pacific. Rev. Biol. Trop. Biol. 2012;60:235–242.
  • Dojiri M, Ho J-S. Systematics of the Caligidae, copepods parasitic on marine fishes. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV; 2013.10.1163/9789004204256
  • Kaji T, Venmathi Maran BA, Kondoh Y, et al. The lunule of caligid copepods: an evolutionary novel structure. Evol. Dev. 2012;14:465–475.10.1111/ede.2012.14.issue-6
  • Bravo S, Treasurer J, Sepulveda M, et al. Effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide in the control of Caligus rogercresseyi in Chile and implications for sea louse management. Aquaculture. 2010;303:22–27.10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.007
  • Hoberg EP, Brooks DR. A macroevolutionary mosaic: episodic host–switching, geographical colonization and diversification in complex host-parasite systems. J. Biogeogr. 2008;35:1533–1550.10.1111/jbi.2008.35.issue-9
  • Wilson CB. North American parasitic copepods belonging to the family Caligidae, Part I: The Caliginae. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 1905;28:479–672.10.5479/si.00963801.28-1404.479
  • Cressey RF, Cressey HB. Parasitic copepods of mackerel- and tuna-like fishes (Scombridae) of the world. Smith. Contrib. Zool. 1980;311:1–186.
  • Morales-Serna FN, Pinacho-Pinacho CD, Gómez S, et al. Diversity of sea lice (Copepoda: Caligidae) parasitic on marine fishes with commercial and aquaculture importance in Chamela Bay, Pacific coast of Mexico by using morphology and DNA barcoding, with description of a new species of Caligus. Parasitol. Int. 2014;63:69–79.10.1016/j.parint.2013.09.005
  • Venmathi Maran BA, Ohtsuka S. Descriptions of caligiform copepods in plankton samples from East Asia: accidental occurrences or new mode of life cycle? Plank. Benth. Res. 2008;3:202–2015.10.3800/pbr.3.202
  • Morales-Serna FN, Caña-Bozada V, Mera-Loor G, et al. New records of sea lice (Copepoda: Caligidae) from marine fishes in Jaramijó, an area with potential for sea-cage aquaculture in Ecuador. Zootaxa. 2015;3920:366–380.10.11646/zootaxa.3920.2
  • Cressey R. Revision of the genus Alebion (Copepoda: Caligoida). Smith. Contrib. Zool. 1972;123:1–29.10.5479/si.00810282.123
  • Luque JL, Tavares LER. Checklist of Copepoda associated with fishes from Brazil. Zootaxa. 2007;1579:1–39.
  • Morales-Serna FN, Gómez S, Pérez-Ponce de León G. Parasitic copepods reported from Mexico. Zootaxa. 2012;3234:43–68.
  • Muñoz G, Olmos V. Revisión bibliográfica de especies ectoparásitas y hospederas de sistemas acuáticos de Chile [Bibliographic revision of ectoparasite and host species from aquatic systems of Chile]. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 2007;42:89–148, Spanish.
  • Paschoal F, Cezar AD, Luque JL. Checklist of metazoan associated with grunts (Perciformes, Haemulidae) from the Nearctic and Neotropical regions. Check List. 2015;11(1), 1501.10.15560/11.1.1501
  • Ho J-S, Bashirullah AKM. Two species of caligid copepods (Crustacea) parasitic on marine fishes of Venezuela, with discussion of Metacaligus Thomsen, 1949. J. Nat. Hist. 1977;11:703–714.10.1080/00222937700770601
  • Fuentes-Zambrano JL, Silva-Rojas C, Reyes-León Y. Parásitos en juveniles de Lutjanus griseus (Pisces: Lutjanidae) de la laguna de la Restinga, Isla de Margarita, Venezuela [Parasites in Lutjanus griseus (Pisces: Lutjanidae) juvenile from the Restinga lagoon, Margarita Island, Venezuela]. Interciencia. 2003;28:463–468, Spanish.
  • Cressey R. Parasitic copepods from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea, III: Caligus. Smith. Contrib. Zool. 1991;497:1–53.10.5479/si.00810282.497
  • Álvarez-León R. Asociaciones y patologías en los peces dulceacuícolas, estuarinos y marinos de Colombia: aguas libres y controladas [Associations and pathologies in fresh-, brackish- and marine water fishes from Colombia: free and controlled waters]. Bol. Cient Mus. Hist. Nat. Univ. Caldas. 2007;11:81–129, Spanish.
  • Varela C, Lucero-Salcedo RD. Nuevos registros de copépodos (Crustacea: Maxillopoda: Copepoda) para Cuba [New records of copepods (Crustacea: Maxillopoda: Copepoda) for Cuba]. Rev. Invest. Pecuaria. 2012;1:118–125, Spanish.
  • Chero J, Cruces C, Iannacone J, et al. Índices parasitológicos de la merluza peruana Merluccius gayi peruanus (Ginsburg, 1954) (Perciformes: Merlucciidae) adquiridos del terminal pesquero de Ventanilla, Callao, Perú [Parasitological indices of the peruvian hake Merluccius gayi peruanus (Ginsburg, 1954) (Perciformes: merlucciidae) acquired at the fishing terminal of Ventanilla, Callao, Peru]. Neotrop. Helminthol. 2014;8:141–162, Spanish.
  • Suárez-Morales E, Camisotti H, Martín A. A new species of Caligus (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida) from the plankton of the Caribbean coast of Venezuela with a key to species. ZooKeys. 2012;201:59–71.10.3897/zookeys.201.3099
  • Cantatore DMP, Braicovich PE, Alarcos AJ, et al. New records of parasitic copepods (Crustacea, Copepoda) from marine fishes in the Argentinean Sea. Acta Parasitol. 2012;57:83–89.
  • Morales-Serna FN, Hernández-Inda ZL, Gómez S, et al. Redescription of Caligus serratus Shiino, 1965 (Copepoda: Caligidae) parasitic on eleven fish species from Chamela Bay in the Mexican Pacific. Acta Parasitol. 2013;58:367–375.
  • Suárez-Morales E, Kim I-H, Escamilla BJ. On some caligids (Copepoda: Caligidae) from plankton of a coastal lagoon in the Gulf of Mexico with a description of a new species of Metacaligus. Zool. Stud. 2012;51:804–818.
  • Morales-Serna FN, Rodríguez-Santiago MA, Gómez S. Euryphorus suarezi n. sp. (Copepoda: Caligidae) parasitic on an elasmobranch from the Gulf of Mexico. Syst. Parasitol. 2016;93:91–99.10.1007/s11230-015-9608-6
  • Díaz-Díaz O. Copépodos ectoparásitos del pez luna Mola mola (Giglioli, 1883) (Pisces: Molidae) en el Golfo de Cariaco, Venezuela [Ectoparasitic copepods from the sunfish Mola mola (Giglioli, 1883) (Pisces: Molidae) in the Cariaco Trench, Venezuela]. Bol. Inst. Oceanogr. Venezuela Univ. Oriente. 2000;39:11–17, Spanish.

Appendix 1.

List of sea lice (Copepoda: Caligidae) species parasitic on fishes reported from the Neotropical region