ABSTRACT
Two recent review papers in Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure have made the case for a step change in the way infrastructure is conceived and delivered. The papers define the term ‘flexible infrastructure’ and provide examples to support a case for transition. The papers present compelling alternative ideas to the current predominant mode of infrastructure development. However, they undervalue many of the advantages of centralized infrastructure systems that underpin city and national infrastructure networks. We provide some examples of the strengths of what might be deemed ‘rigid’ infrastructure and that the concepts of adaptability can directly apply to upgrading these existing centralized, networked systems. In doing so, we contribute to the debate about appropriate advances forward, highlighting the risks of technological optimism and emphasizing the importance of long-term planning and investment.
KEYWORDS:
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Shoshanna Saxe
Shoshanna Saxe is an Assistant Professor in the University of Toronto’s Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering. She investigates the relationship between the infrastructure we build and the society we create to identify opportunities – and pathways – to better align infrastructure provision with sustainability. Dr. Saxe is a Dean's Spark Professor in Infrastructure Sustainability.
Kristen MacAskill
Kristen MacAskill directs the Construction Engineering Masters programme at the Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge. Within the department she is based in the Laing O’Rourke Centre for Construction Engineering and Technology. Dr MacAskill specialises in research on the governance of infrastructure - exploring how government policy, standards and organisational structures influence what infrastructure solutions are designed and built.