863
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

The complete mitochondrial genome of the terebellid polychaete Thelepus plagiostoma (Terebellida; Terebellidae)

, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3114-3116 | Received 11 Jul 2021, Accepted 27 Aug 2021, Published online: 05 Oct 2021

Abstract

Here, we report the complete mitogenome information of the terebellid polychaete, Thelepus plagiostoma (Schmarda, 1861). Genome sequencing by Illumina HiSeq platform permitted assembly of a circular mitochondrial genome of 15,628 bp from T. plagiostoma consisting of 67% AT nucleotides, 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, and a non-coding region in the typical annelid gene composition. Gene order of the T. plagiostoma mitochondrion is identical to those of the Terebelliformia mitogenomes. Phylogenetic reconstruction places T. plagiostoma within the monophyletic subclass Sedentaria, a sister to Pista cristata in the suborder Terebelliformia.

Annelida, also known as a segmented worm, is a complex phylum that occupies a variety of environments (e.g. marine, terrestrial, and fresh water) with notably derived morphologies, outstanding ecological diversity, and broad life strategies such as deposit/filter feeders, herbivores and/or carnivores (Struck et al. Citation2011; Andrade et al. Citation2015). Annelids were traditionally classified into Polychaeta and Clitellata, but molecular phylogenomic approach combined with genomic data and morphological parameters indicated the Polychaeta as a synonym of annelids (Struck et al. Citation2011, 2017; Weigert et al. Citation2014). Now, classification of the diversity of Annelida consists of two main clades, Sedentaria and Errantia (Struck et al. Citation2011; Weigert et al. Citation2014; Weigert and Bleidorn Citation2016; Struck Citation2017). Although the two main monophyletic annelid backbone tree is well-established, many areas of the phylogenetic relationship in Sedentaria are still poorly resolved and there are many challenges needed to be focused on this clade.

The spaghetti worms, Terebellids are tubicolous polychaetes and exhibit a wide geographical distribution, ranging from the North Pole to the Antarctic. Recently, phylogenetic subfamilial status in Terebelliformia was restored by means of a combination of 12,674 orthologous gene information and morphological data (Stiller et al. Citation2020), whereas several species are still missing due to absence of genomic information and uncertain delineation of lineages. The marine polychaete, Thelepus plagiostoma Schmarda, 1861 (Terebellida; Terebellidae) inhabits soft sediments from intertidal to shallow offshore reef with depths between 5 and 400 m. Distribution of T. plagiostoma has been mostly reported in tropical Indo-West Pacific Ocean and the Antarctica. However, it was also identified at Arctic-Pacific-boreal and Atlantic-boreal shelf (Leontovich Citation2011). In this study, a specimen of T. plagiostoma was collected from the Beaufort Sea (69°52'N, 139°03'W) in 2017 using a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) belonging to the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI). The specimen and DNA was deposited in the Research Institute of Basic Sciences of Incheon National University (Species ID: Annelid-04; Specimen ID: KOPRI-Benthos-26; https://www.inu.ac.kr/user/indexMain.do?siteId=ribs; Dr. Sang-Eun Nam; [email protected]).

Genomic DNA was prepared from a specimen muscle using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol. A fragment library was prepared using the TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) as previously described (Nam et al. Citation2021), before sequencing by Illumina HiSeq sequencer. The sequencing library was prepared by random fragmentation of the DNA sample, followed by 5′ and 3′ adapter ligation. Raw reads were obtained from the sample that passed the quality control check in the Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina) at Macrogen, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). Adapter sequences, low quality reads, reads with >10% of unknown bases, and ambiguous bases were removed to obtain high quality assembly. After the quality check process, a total of 24,256,126 filtered reads were obtained from 34,479,378 raw reads. Subsequently, de novo assembly was conducted with various k-mers using SPAdes (Bankevich et al. Citation2012), and a circular contig of the T. plagiostoma mitogenome was obtained. The resulting contig consensus sequence was annotated using MITOS2 (Bernt et al. Citation2013) and tRNAscan-SE 2.0 (Lowe and Eddy Citation1997). Finally, BLAST searches confirmed the identity of the genes (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

The T. plagiostoma circular 15,628 bp mitogenome (GenBank accession no. MW557377) was composed of nucleotide composition: 30.9% A, 12.0% C, 21.3% G, and 35.8% T. The gene order and composition of the T. plagiostoma mitogenome is identical to all known Terebelliformia mitogenomes (Nam et al. Citation2021). Thirteen T. plagiostoma mitochondrial protein-coding genes (PCGs) begin with ATG or ATT start codon and the 22 tRNAs have typical cloverleaf secondary structures. The overall genomic architecture of the T. plagiostoma mitochondrion is typical for Terebelliformia (e.g. Melinna cristata, Pista cristata, Terebellides stroemii). We reconstructed a phylogeny using the concatenated set of the whole 13 PCGs of the T. plagiostoma mitogenome, 6 published mitogenomes belonging to Sedentaria, 17 mitogenomes involved in Errantia, and two Sipuncula species as outgroups (). The T. plagiostoma formed a sister group with Terebelliformia such as Terebellides stroemii (Terebellida, Trichobranchidae), Melinna cristata (Terebellida, Melinnidae), and Pista cristata (Terebellida, Terebellidae). Since molecular phylogenetic relationship in families belonging to Sedentaria is still controversial due to limited information of whole mitogenomes, the complete mitogenome sequence of T. plagiostoma will serve as an essential resource for understanding the phylogenetic relationship and evolutionary history of Terebelliformia.

Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogeny of 7 published mitogenomes from Sedentaria including T. plagiostoma and 17 registered mitogenomes of Errantia species, and two Sipuncula species as an outgroup based on the concatenated nucleotide sequences of protein-coding genes (PCGs). The phylogenetic analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood method, GTR + G + I model with a bootstrap of 1,000 replicates. Numbers on the branches indicate ML bootstrap percentages. DDBJ/EMBL/Genbank accession numbers for published sequences are incorporated. The black triangle means the polychaete analyzed in this study.

Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogeny of 7 published mitogenomes from Sedentaria including T. plagiostoma and 17 registered mitogenomes of Errantia species, and two Sipuncula species as an outgroup based on the concatenated nucleotide sequences of protein-coding genes (PCGs). The phylogenetic analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood method, GTR + G + I model with a bootstrap of 1,000 replicates. Numbers on the branches indicate ML bootstrap percentages. DDBJ/EMBL/Genbank accession numbers for published sequences are incorporated. The black triangle means the polychaete analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Dr. Tae-Yoon S. Park and Mr. Ji-Hoon Kihm (Korea Polar Research Institute) for their help on field work and sampling.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

BioProject, BioSample, and SRA accession numbers are https://www.ncbi.nlm.ni h.gov/bioproject/PRJNA699104, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/SAMN17766233, and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR15041259, respectively. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, with an accession number MW557377.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the Incheon National University Grant [2019-0014].

References

  • Andrade SCS, Novo M, Kawauchi GY, Worsaae K, Pleijel F, Giribet G, Rouse GW. 2015. Articulating “archiannelids”: phylogenomics and annelid relationships, with emphasis on meiofaunal taxa. Mol Biol Evol. 32(11):2860–2875.
  • Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19(5):455–477.
  • Bernt A, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69(2):313–319.
  • Leontovich MK. 2011. Terebellidae (Polychaeta) умеренных и холодных вод Евразии. Таксономия и биогеография [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Moscow, Russia: Moscow State University.
  • Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(5):955–964.
  • Nam S-E, Lee S, Rhee J-S. 2021. Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of the polychaete, Melinna cristata. Mitochondr DNA B Resour. 6(10):3038-3040.
  • Nam S-E, Lee S, Park T-YS, Rhee J-S. 2021. Complete mitochondrial genome of the marine polychaete, Nereis zonata (Phyllodocida, Nereididae) isolated from the Beaufort Sea. Mitochondr DNA B Resour. 6(1):231–233.
  • Stiller J, Tilic E, Rousset V, Pleijel F, Rouse GW. 2020. Spaghetti to a tree: A robust phylogeny for Terebelliformia (Annelida) based on transcriptomes, molecular and morphological data. Biology. 9:73.
  • Struck TH. 2017. Phylogeny of Annelida. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, Malhotra A, editors. Evolution of venomous animals and their toxins. Toxinology. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hösel C, Kube M, Lieb B, Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, et al. 2011. Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature. 471(7336):95–98.
  • Weigert A, Bleidorn C. 2016. Current status of annelid phylogeny. Org Divers Evol. 16(2):345–362.
  • Weigert A, Helm C, Meyer M, Nickel B, Arendt D, Hausdorf B, Santos SR, Halanych KM, Purschke G, Bleidorn C, et al. 2014. Illuminating the base of the Annelid tree using transcriptomics. Mol Biol Evol. 31(6):1391–1401.