Publication Cover
Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development
Personalized medicine in drug development and clinical practice
Volume 1, 2016 - Issue 5
123
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Molecular screening programmes for precision medicine: lessons learned from personalized medicine trials

, , , &
Pages 419-430 | Received 24 May 2016, Accepted 13 Sep 2016, Published online: 29 Sep 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The efficacy of targeted therapies in patient populations selected on the basis of the molecular features of their tumours has gained tremendous attention and is shifting the current focus of treatment to biomarker-driven clinical trials. Molecularly-selected patients are the best-case-scenario for proof-of-concept in the early development of new drugs and a potential path for registration. Developing targeted therapies in biomarker-selected patient populations can also face additional challenges.

Areas covered: Different approaches in order to select patients for specific treatments are possible, using modern and relatively inexpensive genotyping platforms, but quite often logistics are their bottleneck. Main stakeholders may have different points of view on the co-development of drug-test (Pharma, diagnostic companies, clinical investigators, patients, Regulatory Agencies), which will influence how clinical research is implemented, and ultimately its feasibility.

Expert commentary: Molecular prescreening programs vary in their focus of attention, with two clearly differentiated tactics: finding patients for trials or finding trials for patients. Sample management, type of assays and platforms used, logistics, turn-around time, and cost will all depend on the scope of the prescreening program and will define its returns. In conclusion, to optimize benefit for individual patients a biomarker-driven setting for clinical trials is a rational approach.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.