34
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Quality of life in patients with invasive bladder cancer who cannot undergo cystectomy

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 339-345 | Received 26 Nov 2015, Accepted 16 May 2016, Published online: 13 Jun 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Background: To evaluate the quality of life in a bladder preservation strategy for patients with invasive bladder cancer, who are not eligible or refuse surgery.

Methods: From January 2000 to February 2008 a total of 24 patients [mean age of 81 years - range 68 to 92] with muscle invasive bladder cancer, who had refused or had not been eligible for cystectomy, were followed up until their death.

Results: 24 (21M/3F) patients were followed up for an average of 30.9 [range 10.4 - 73] months. All patients complained of frequency, urgency and severe nocturia. The second most frequent complication was bleeding, which required a salvage cystectomy in 11 cases. Other major complications were intestinal occlusion in five cases, four enterovesical fistulas, two brain metastases requiring neurosurgical intervention and radiation therapy of the brain, bone metastases in the cervical and thoracic spinal column with transient or permanent neurological impairment. The average re-admission rate was 11 times per patient and the average time spent at the hospital was 155 [range 13-256] days.

Conclusion: We failed to give the patients a good remaining lifespan and we were surprised first, by the high cancer specific mortality rather than mortality related to a major comorbidity; second, by the insufficient patient assessment by all of the involved parties and third, how heavily the quality of life was compromised and how helpless us caregivers were. Therefore acting is better than reacting.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.