Publication Cover
Mitochondrial DNA Part A
DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis
Volume 30, 2019 - Issue 1
146
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Molecular species delimitation in the genus Rhamma Johnson, 1992 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae, Theclinae)

, &
Pages 101-117 | Received 15 Nov 2017, Accepted 03 Apr 2018, Published online: 19 Apr 2018
 

Abstract

In this work, we used mtDNA data as a tool to delimit species and we compared the resulting molecular operational taxonomic units (barcode index number, BIN) with morphology-based identifications in the Colombian species of Rhamma Johnson, 1992 exploring the usefulness of DNA barcodes for taxonomy, species identification and delimitation. We obtained cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequences for 134 morphologically identified specimens, representing 12 species of Rhamma from Colombia. Ten of these species have not been previously barcoded. DNA barcodes suggested the potential for eight additional cryptic species in Colombia but we were readily able to morphologically diagnose just one of these linages as a new species which recently was described in a separate paper as Rhamma dawkinsi Prieto & Lorenc-Brudecka, 2017. The morphological species were separated into three categories: species showing a perfect match between morphological species and BINs (33%, four species); species sharing a BIN completely or partly (single specimens) with another morphological species (42%, five species placed in three BINs); and morphological species splitting up into more than one BIN (25%, three species placed in 10 BINs). The high percentages of incongruence between morphology-based identification and species delineation through BINs, could be explained as a consequence of high rates of introgressive hybridization. However, DNA barcodes can be considered diagnostic even in cases where specimens of a species were assigned to two or more distinct BINs and in species showing a low but constant divergence causing their assignment to a single BIN, which is often the case in young, allopatric species. We retain 10 of the 12 species (83%) to be diagnostic in molecular identification.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Tomasz Pyrcz and Jadwiga Lorenc-Brudecka (Zoological Museum of the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland), Robert Robbins (Smithsonian Institution, USA), Christophe Faynel (France), Gonzalo Andrade (ICN, Colombia), Robert Busby (USA), Pierre Boyer (France), Gabriel Rodríguez, Maria Angelica Vargas, Gregory Nielsen, and Jean François Le Crom (Colombia) for help and support in many ways.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported with funds from the Georg Forster Research Fellowship Program of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Bonn), the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (Germany) and the Vice-Rectorate for Research of the Universidad del Atlántico, Colombia under resolution number 3247 June 12 2015.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.