274
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Fish passage developments for small-bodied tropical fish: field case-studies lead to technology improvements

&
Pages 14-26 | Received 04 Feb 2019, Accepted 18 Jul 2019, Published online: 27 Sep 2019
 

Abstract

In tropical coastal lowland rivers, there are frequently biodiverse upstream migrations of post-larval and juvenile diadromous fish from estuaries into freshwater. Tidal barriers completely block major migratory pathways for these fish and have contributed to major losses of freshwater biodiversity. In northern Australia, early efforts to improve tropical river fish passage with salmonid-style fishways completely failed. Since the mid-1990s, low gradient vertical-slot and rock fishways improved fish passage but the smallest and most abundant fish (i.e. from 10 to 100 mm long) often still failed to ascend. Since the mid-2000s, there was a paradigm shift in hydraulic design criteria for new fishways, with a renewed focus on: (i) low turbulence, (ii) maximized roughness and hydraulic boundary layers to optimise fish ascent. We used a combined methodology, firstly developing a conceptual model of fish movement to inform fishway design criteria, secondly tabulating past and present fishway design criteria, and thirdly conducting a series of brief field case-studies, at tidal barriers in tropical rivers for new technical and rock fishways. Our objective was to evaluate the success of these new designs for passage of very small (from 9 mm long) diadromous fish on low head barriers (i.e. <3 m high). We conclude that while there have been improvements in passage of small-bodied fish at tidal barriers further experimental work is still needed to test and refine current ecohydraulic fishway design criteria.

Acknowledgements

We thank Darren Jennings, Matthew Moore, Alana O’Brien and Melinda Scanlon, previously staff at the Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries who aided in the development, construction and monitoring many fishway designs in Queensland. Field sampling was completed under Animal Ethics Authorisation No. CA2014/08/798.

Disclosure statement

The authors work for agencies or consultancies who provide professional fishway and fish passage advice.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.