ABSTRACT
Background
Injury perceptions and related risk-mitigating interventions are context-dependent. Despite this, most injury surveillance systems are not context-specific as they do not integrate end-users perspectives.
Purpose
To explore how Maltese national team football players, coaches, and health professionals perceive a football-related injury and how their context influences their perceptions and behaviours towards reporting and managing a football injury.
Methods
13 semi-structured interviews with Maltese female and male national team football players (n = 7), coaches (n = 3), and health professionals (n = 3) were conducted. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results
Three themes were identified: (1) How do I perceive an injury? Consisted of various constructs of a sports injury, yet commonly defined based on performance limitations. (2) How do I deal with an injury? Encapsulated the process of managing the injury (3) What influences my perception, reporting and management of an injury? Comprised personal and contextual factors that influenced the perception and, consequently, the management of an injury.
Conclusion
Performance limitations should be used as part of future injury definitions in injury surveillance systems. Human interaction should be involved in all the processes of an injury surveillance framework, emphasising its active role to guide the injury management process.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Malta Football Association for providing the chance to conduct the study with its own stakeholders and Ms. Alessia Schembri for providing assistance in the translation of quotes from Maltese to English. This work was supported by the Maltese Tertiary Education Scholarship Scheme (TESS), however it did not have any role in the conduct of the study.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Author contributions
All authors assisted in conceiving and designing the study: SV, IM, EV and CB. Data Collections: SV. Data Analysis: SV and CB. Data review and interpretation: all authors. Manuscript preparation, revisions and approval for the final version: all authors