Publication Cover
Structural Heart
The Journal of the Heart Team
Volume 2, 2018 - Issue 6
73
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from The ATTRACTIVE Study

, MBBS, MRCP (UK), FHKAM (Medicine), FHKCPORCID Icon, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, DMSc & , MD, PhD show all
Pages 514-520 | Received 04 May 2018, Accepted 23 Aug 2018, Published online: 19 Sep 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Background: To study the safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in combination with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), atrial fibrillation (AF) and high bleeding risk.

Methods: During a 14-month period, 308 patients underwent TAVR. Of these, 118 patients (38%) were known to have AF and 20 patients with a high bleeding risk were treated with LAAC (TAVR + LAAC group) vs. 98 patients who were continued on medical therapy for stroke prevention (TAVR + medical group). In case of combined TAVR + LAAC, TAVR was performed first, followed by LAAC 4−10 days later. Clinical 1-year follow-up data were available for all patients. In the TAVR + LAAC group, both TAVR and LAAC procedures were performed successfully without any major procedural complication. Following LAAC, all patients, except one, received double anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) for a period of 3 months, followed by single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT).

Results: At 1-year follow-up, there were no reports of stroke, thromboembolism (TE) or major bleeding in the TAVR + LAAC population, whereas in the TAVR + (N)OAC group, a stroke/TE was reported in four patients (5%; p = 0.236) and a major bleeding was noted in eight patients (10%; p = 0.036).

Conclusions: Treatment of patients with severe AS, AF, and a high bleeding risk with combined TAVR and LAAC is feasible and safe with no procedural complications. Medium-term safety and efficacy outcomes are promising. Large-scale studies and longer-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.

Disclosure statements

FJS has been a consultant for Medtronic. GB has been a consultant for Abbott and Medtronic. OWF has received an institutional research grant from Abbott and has been a consultant for Edwards Inc. LS has been a consultant for Abbott, Medtronic and Boston Scientific. ODB has been consultant for Abbott and Boston Scientific. All other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.