615
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The peculiar case of Myxicola infundibulum (Polychaeta: Sabellidae): echo from a science 200 years old and description of four new taxa in the Mediterranean Sea

, &
Pages 506-546 | Received 20 Sep 2022, Accepted 06 Feb 2023, Published online: 27 Jun 2023

Abstract

Myxicola infundibulum Montagu, 1808 is the most reported species of its genus, showing an unusually wide distribution from the Mediterranean area to Australia, North Europe, and North America, a situation deriving from a wide synonymizing of numerous species with M. infundibulum. Recently, genetic analysis confirmed that the Australian form of this species is an introduced taxon from the Mediterranean area, while the examined North American specimens were genetically and morphologically different. In the present paper we travel through the history of M. infundibulum from the first descriptions, trying to trace both the origin of this taxon and the origin of its wide distribution, through an analysis of the descriptions of all valid and invalid taxa to date. We also examined material present in the collection of one of the authors previously identified as M. infundibulum, comparing Mediterranean material to some from the English Channel, and material from North America. This led to the erection of four taxa new to science from material recently collected along the Italian coasts, and the restoration of Myxicola pacifica Johnson, 1901. Delimitation of taxa is based only on morphology, and we propose new morphological features to be considered; however, a molecular examination is planned in the near future.

http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7CF64CB2-8B9C-4001-BE57-199B5F95213B

Introduction

The first cladistic analysis of the genus Myxicola, conducted on morphological features, included it in the most plesiomorphic clade within sabellid phylogeny (Fitzhugh Citation1989), where it remained until a recent phylogenetic analysis based on molecular sequence data, which moved the genus to a more apomorphic area, creating the clade Myxicolinae, containing two tribes, named Amphiglenini and Myxicolini (Tilic et al. Citation2020). However, before its relationships with other sabellid genera can be analysed, a large revision at the generic level is needed to understand the diversity and morphological variability within the genus.

Myxicola Koch in Renier Citation1847 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) is a quite homogeneous genus characterized by a transparent, gelatinous tube, radioles united by a high palmate membrane giving the crown a peculiar shape, abdominal uncinigerous tori forming almost complete cinctures, and an atypical arrangement of dorsal and ventral lips of the peristomial collar (Fitzhugh Citation1989, Citation2003; Capa et al. Citation2011). Myxicola infundibulum (Montagu, Citation1808) is the type species of the genus as well as the most commonly reported taxon. The first difficulty that arises in revising the genus is the lack of a good description and figures of type species as well as the type material.

Although about 20 species have been described in the genus (Read Citation2015), the number of currently accepted species is lower, due to several subsequent synonymizations of different taxa that have led to the interpretation of M. infundibulum as a cosmopolitan taxon (e.g. Fauvel Citation1927; Day Citation1961; Imajima Citation1968; Hutchings & Glasby Citation2004; Edgar Citation2008). As observed by Capa and Murray (Citation2015), who described Myxicola nana Capa and Murray, Citation2015 from Australian waters, it is amazing that the most recent description dates to 1928, with Myxicola fauveli Potts, Citation1928. This was probably due to the poor character definitions and poor descriptions present in literature, such that most of the time any Myxicola specimens collected, especially in faunistic works, were simply identified as M. infundibulum.

With the advent of molecular techniques, some clarifications started to occur. This led to the identification in Australian waters of a taxon identified as M. infundibulum, an anthropogenic translocation out of its natural distribution range (Dane Citation2008). Morphological and genetic analysis conducted on specimens collected from North America (Maine, East Coast), the Mediterranean Sea (French, Italian and Croatian coasts) and Australia (Southern coasts) revealed that the former diverges both morphologically and genetically from the latter two, suggesting a unidirectional relationship of provenience between the two taxa (Dane Citation2008). However, it was taken for granted that the translocated European taxon was M. infundibulum and, once again, the lack of a good morphological analysis did not allow the erection of a new species for the American material. Dane (Citation2008) added the shape of abdominal uncini, which was a new feature in the morphological analysis. More recently, Darbyshire (Citation2019), studying the British Myxicola forms, and in agreement with Knight-Jones’ suggestions (Hayward & Ryland Citation1990), recognized at least two taxa, easily distinguishable for the tip of the radioles, dark in the one collected in the type locality, that should correspond to the type species of M. infundibulum, and white in another taxon that could be Myxicola sarsii Krøyer, Citation1856, one of the species previously synonymized with M. infundibulum.

The current understanding about the number of species and their definition and distributions within the genus Myxicola remains particularly limited, overlooking a whole set of heterogeneous characters related both to the hard structure of the body (i.e. chaetae and uncini) and to the features of the crown (Fitzhugh Citation1989). Dane (Citation2008) showed that the taxon considered M. infundibulum has some additional smaller flanking teeth in addition to the main fang of the abdominal uncini. She also suggested that variation observed between the geographically distant populations studied could be size-related, with larger specimens having a greater number of ‘secondary’ teeth. However, this was not corroborated by the finding in the very small-sized species M. nana Capa and Murray, Citation2015 of larger and more numerous uncinal teeth than in the larger Myxicola taxa (Capa & Murray, Citation2015).

In this study we present a re-evaluation of information contained in old literature, reconstructing the history of the taxon, the origin of its cosmopolitan state and the impact that the absence of type material has had on its taxonomy. In the second part we report results from morphological examination of M. infundibulum material present in the collection of one of the authors (AG), together with specimens more recently collected along the Italian coasts, introducing additional morphological features for separating taxa within the genus and describing several new Mediterranean species, together with the re-establishment of one taxon (M. pacifica Johnson, Citation1901), hitherto synonymized with M. infundibulum.

Materials and methods

Material examined

The World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) database allowed us to access the current status of the Myxicola genus, detecting the nominal species synonymized with M. infundibulum and tracing their original descriptions. A re-evaluation of information about the presence of M. infundibulum in the Mediterranean waters through analysis of literature, from a hardcopy archive of one of the authors (AG) and from digitized materials (from Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti), was also performed.

Specimens of Myxicola present in the collection of the Marine Station of Porto Cesareo of the University of Salento (Lecce) (PCZL), located at the Zoological Laboratory of the Salento University (Giangrande et al. Citation2015), were re-examined. The material comes from the English Channel (Cornwall) and Pacific North America (Friday Harbor, WA, USA), together with material from the Mediterranean, collected along the Italian coast, Naples (Tyrrhenian Seas, Western Mediterranean), lake of Faro (Torre Faro, ME, Sicily, Italy), and Croatia (Adriatic Sea). In addition to this material already present in the collection, other specimens were collected along the Apulian coast, Ionian and South Adriatic Seas (Eastern Mediterranean). Lastly, historically sampled specimens of M. infundibulum from theGulf of Naples were analysed at the Darwin Dohrn Museum (DaDoM) of the Stazione Zoologica of Naples for comparison to our material from the same locality, and syntypes of M. pacifica were loaned from the Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard University (MCZH), for comparison to our material collected in Friday Harbor.

The vast majority of the Myxicola material comes from shallow waters (1–6 m), and sediment of varying typology (from sandy and muddy soft bottoms to hard substrata of natural and artificial origins). The only exception is the material from Croatia, which was collected at a greater depth (31 m) on sandy substrata (Mikac et al. Citation2013).

Photographs were taken using an SMZ 25 Stereo Microscope equipped with a DS-Ri2 video camera and a NIS–Elements BR 4.30.02 Nikon Instruments video-interactive image analysis system, while drawings were performed with a camera lucida. Specimens present at the DaDoM were analysed with a Leica S9i stereoscope and photographed by means of its dedicated software.

The natural colouration of fresh material makes the detection of possible patterns more difficult; thus, to highlight the staining pattern of the segments, peristomium and collar, worms were stained with methyl green stain, following the procedure of Winsnes (1985): the worms were fully submerged in methyl green dye and left for 1–2 minutes to absorb the stain. They were then transferred to 70% ethanol and left until the excess stain had been removed (approximately 15–20 minutes).

Characters used in the morphological analysis

A set of characters was considered including new features for the genus suggested by Dane (Citation2008) and Capa and Murray (Citation2015).

General body shape

Most descriptions (especially older ones) take into account the general body shape of the animal, distinguishing between uniformly tapering or abruptly rounded, truncated posteriorly and stockier forms. This information could be useful as it is generally linked to the size of the species, as well as for comparison with very old descriptions. However, in more recent years the informative value of this character has been criticized (Dane Citation2008).

Colouration

There is a great variability in colouration of alive individuals, a feature which appears to have been overlooked. An examination of web images of specimens classified as M. infundibulum (with information on the locality of the photo) revealed a great variability of forms and colours of the crown that can hide the presence of different species. The crown can be completely pale or coloured from violet to very dark brown; moreover, often the tip of radioles is darker than the rest of the crown. This characteristic is usually maintained in fixed material.

Biometry

The relative size of various parts has been used in descriptions of Myxicola species and of species belonging to other sabellid genera (Kröyer Citation1856; McIntosh Citation1922; Hayward & Ryland Citation1995; Costa-Paiva et al. Citation2007). The length of the animal and length of the thorax were measured laterally, while the length of the abdomen was calculated from the previous two measurements. The height of the peristomium (from the tip of the triangular lobe to the first chaetiger) and the width were measured ventrally at the fourth thoracic chaetiger. Crown length was measured laterally. Being the measurements of length and width alone not taxonomically reliable characters (Bick Citation2007; Costa-Paiva et al. Citation2007; Capa et al. Citation2011), they were utilized in the description, but not taken into consideration as discriminant features. However, some measurements such as number of thoracic segments, number of abdominal segments, and number of radioles are more homogeneous among the descriptions, allowing us to make comparisons. The ratio between crown and body length seemed particularly important to us; this feature was already emphasized by Dane (Citation2008), and is considered informative for the distinction between closely related species in other sabellid genera in recent studies (Giangrande et al. Citation2021). For this reason, the crown/body length ratio was considered a good feature also for separation of Myxicola taxa.

Crown features

The number of radioles on each side of the branchial crown was counted. Whenever there was a discrepancy between the two sides, the greater number was used for analyses. Palmate membrane height and shape were assessed. Radiolar tip length was measured from the very last pinnula; the shape of the tip was assessed as well as the presence and development of radiolar flanges along its length. The ratio between radiolar tip and radiole length was calculated. Pinnular* shape was assessed, distinguishing between thin and thicker ones as well as between blunt vs pointed tips. Maximum pinnular* length was also assessed within a single radiole. Radiole length was measured from the base, detaching it from the crown. The ratio between pinnula length and radiole length was calculated. The disposition of pinnulae was assessed, distinguishing between alternating and paired disposition through the observation of both transverse and longitudinal sections of the radiole under optical microscopy. The number and shape of hyaline skeletal cells inside the radiole, recently used in the characterization of the new species of Myxicola (Capa & Murray, Citation2015), were assessed. Ventral and dorsal lips, as defined by Fitzhugh (Citation2003) and Capa et al. (Citation2011), were examined, with regards to both general shape and height (along the antero-posterior axis). Dorsal radiolar appendages were analysed. Lastly, the presence of radiolar eyes was also carefully analysed, differentiating between simple and repetitive eyespots and compound eyes with complex structures.

Thorax features

The shape and features of the ventral lobe were assessed. The number of thoracic segments was counted. The shape of thoracic chaetae was detected at chaetigers 1 and 4. Thoracic uncini were detected at chaetiger 4 and analysed, considering the number and disposition of teeth above the main fang and their relative length. Although sabellids are remarkable among polychaetes in having eyespots distributed throughout the body (Fitzhugh Citation1989), and the presence of them on the peristomium and in interramal areas of the thorax was mentioned in early literature pertaining to Myxicola (McIntosh, Citation1922), this feature has been neglected in past descriptions and considered only in descriptions of Myxicola aesthetica (Claparède, Citation1870) (Hayward & Ryland Citation1995). The presence or absence of eyespots on the thorax was therefore judged to be potentially informative (Dane Citation2008). If present, the segment range of eyespots was also recorded, and for the thorax the first segment with eyespots was noted. In relation to this, we made a point of differentiating between properly named interramal eyespots, as have been found in recently described Myxicola species (Capa & Murray Citation2015), and the lateral eyespot (Capa et al. Citation2014), challenging the informative quality of such differentiation. We also assessed the presence or absence of peristomial eyes.

Abdomen features

The number of abdominal segments was assessed. Abdominal chaetae and uncini were detected at chaetigers 21–24, counted and analysed, considering the shape of the breast, the number and disposition of teeth above the main fang and their relative length, as well as the length of the main fang with respect to the breast. Eyespots on the abdomen have not previously been noted at all for the genus Myxicola, whilst pygidial eyespots have been recorded for at least M. infundibulum (Day, Citation1961). For this reason (and likewise for thoracic eyes) we assessed the presence or absence of abdominal eyespots, again differentiating between interramal eyespots properly named and lateral eyespots, and reporting their disposition along the segments. The shape of the pygidium was assessed, together with the presence and disposition of pygidial eyes.

Staining pattern

Methyl green staining was useful only in highlighting the glandular girdle, because in all the examined species the colouration was homogeneous with only the peristomium maintaining a darker colouration with respect to the rest of the body (comprising the crown); the glandular girdle was white. Therefore, it was not considered of diagnostic value.

Results

Part I: Literature analysis

1. Tracing the history of the type species Myxicola infundibulum

The difficulty in identifying the different taxa previously attributed to this species is not only in the presence of very poor descriptions of old material, but also in the absence of type material for this taxon. Moreover, although the original description of M. infundibulum is attributed to Montagu (Citation1808) from material collected from Salt Stone, in the estuary of Kingsbridge (Devonshire, United Kingdom), an almost identical form seems to have been described 4 years earlier by Renier for specimens collected from the Adriatic coasts, as reported by Giuseppe Meneghini (Citation1847).

At present, the species is reported with Montagu as authority in WoRMS (2022), even though Muir and Petersen (Citation2013) underlined how the species has been often reported with Renier as descriptor (e.g. Fauvel Citation1927; Uschakov Citation1955; Hartman Citation1968; Bellan Citation1978; Hobson & Banse Citation1981; Hartmann-Schröder Citation1996; Huang Citation2001; Simboura & Nicolaidou Citation2001), as well as in physiological works and field guides (e.g. Campbell Citation1976; Wirtz Citation1995). In addition, the specific name and authorship M. infundibulum (Grube) has also been used at least twice since 1899 (Nicol & Young Citation1946; Roberts Citation1962 – although Nicol later changed his mind, see Nicol Citation1948). This led to some confusion within the reports of M. infundibulum during the 19th century in European waters, with some authors referring to the description of Montagu as the original one, and others to Renier’s.

Giuseppe Meneghini (Citation1847) not only summarized in his work Renier’s observations about a polychaete that would belong to the taxon “Myxicola infundibulum” but also reported the observations of other naturalists, allowing us to reconstruct the history behind this taxon.

The first description of the animal that would later be named M. infundibulum from Renier dates back to 1804, 4 years before Montagu’s description. Here, Renier (Citation1804) was already solving a problem of synonymy between “Sabella gelatinosa” and “Terebella infundibulum”, where the first was the mucus case of the latter (Tav. alfab. delle Conchiglie Adriat. 1804, p. Xlll, no. 579, note-e). In a second and more in-depth description, again in 1804, Renier changed the name of the species to “Terebella buccina (Terebella Trombetta – Térébelle Trompette)”. In this description we find for the first time the character that stimulated the interest of the naturalists of the 19th century: the peculiar crown shape, with all the radioles tidily disposed and connected by a very high palmate membrane, giving the overall shape of a funnel popping out of the substrate (Renier Citation1804, p. XIX). Based on this and other characters, 3 years later Renier established a new genus for this species, that was named “Tuba divisa (Trombetta divisa)” with the description: “[…] inhabitants of mucus tube, without lateral organs. […] Gills by means of a funnel shaped membrane. Genitals of both sexes visible” (Renier, Citation1807b, Tav. VII).

In the second part of the work, Meneghini lists all the successive descriptions of species having the same peculiar characters noted by Renier. Cuvier (Citation1829-1830, p. 118) reported the species “Sabella villosa” as follows: “[…] there is [one] with gills but as simple funnel around the mouth, [formed] by numerous filets, highly clamped and ciliated on the internal face; foot often imperceptible”; Montagu’s “Amphitrite infundibulum” was also defined by Lamarck (Citation1838, p. 611) as “Equipped with gills forming a funnel with rays on the margin; the singles [gills] are clamped together in a semi-circular membrane fringed on the strip; body sub-naked and smooth”. It is clear that all the features reported are important at the generic level, meaning that they are present in most of the Myxicola species.

We re-evaluated the description of Montagu (Citation1808), from the Salt Stone in the estuary of Kingsbridge, reporting a worm with a long body (20–25 cm in length and up to 160 segments, which decrease in size towards the pygidium), and a crown formed by two semi-circular halves, each constituted by around 37 radioles. The peculiarity of this species is: “[…] the connected fibers of the tentacula, in which it differs from all other hitherto described” Montagu (Citation1808). So, when the animal opens its crown, the two halves form almost an uninterrupted circle, smooth on the outer surface, but tentaculate (with pinnules) in the inner one. Body colour orangish, with white annulation, while crown purple on the outer face and chestnut in the inner one, with radioles’ tip darker. Mouth purple with lips bordered by chestnut. The animal lives in gelatinous tubes composed of strata of different colours, sunken inside the substratum and exposing only the crown into the water column. Interestingly, it has already been proposed that Terebella infundibulum Renier in Meneghini, Citation1847 and Amphitrite infundibulum Montagu, Citation1808 may represent different species, thanks to differences noticed between their original descriptions (e.g. the structure of the tube, which is shown as essentially smooth by Montagu and like drippy candle-wax by Renier) (Muir & Petersen Citation2013).

Meneghini continued citing the studies of Delle Chiaje (Citation1829, Citation1841), who classified the species under the name “Sabella infundibulum”:

Body yellow, ringed and depressed, equipped anteriorly with a roster among the laminar gills, which are violet in the external face and yellowish in the internal one, with little parallel branchial appendices, which make the internal surface hairy, and the semi-circular margin curled blue: cartilaginous transparent tube, depressed, curved.

A similar animal was also described by Forbes (Citation1841, p. XXX) as:

inhabiting a gelatinous tube, submerse in the sandy substrata 3–4 feet below sea surface; the body of red-dusky color formed by possessing 140 segments with two whitish transversal lines each segment and all bearing a fascicle of chaetae on both sides; the head is encircled by two fascicle of gills like a crown, each of them formed by 28 cirri and bearing in the internal side small and very motile pinnulae which create ascendant and descendant current.

Koch is the last person cited by Meneghini in his work, having found an annelid corresponding to the description of Forbes near Trieste. He cited this fact in his lecture at the Gabinetto di Minerva, 18 January 1846, naming it “Myxicola villosa”. In particular he observed that even if the gills are divided into two halves, they form a complete funnel when open, where the crown appears uninterrupted, as in the description of Renier.

Lastly, Meneghini underlined some differences reported by the above-cited naturalists in their descriptions. In particular, he noted a different number of radioles as well as a different number of segments. Moreover, the presence of fascicles of chaetae was not reported by Renier, and both the presence of genital organs on the head and the continuity of the crown were an error made by Renier (the first almost surely due to confusion among the mouth, dorsal and ventral lips and radiolar appendages). Based on these differences, Meneghini concluded that the descriptions reported above, if not ascribable to the same species, surely referred to closely related ones.

The last three works that we re-evaluated are from studies that took place in the same location, namely the Gulf of Naples, but over a time span of 50 years (Claparède, Citation1870, p. 142; Lo Bianco Citation1893; Iroso Citation1921). In all these works the biodiversity of polychaetes inhabiting the area was addressed, and contain both the observation of the presence of the taxon M. infundibulum, and its description. In the first source, after the description of the individuals found in the Gulf of Naples, Claparède discusses the effective identity between the individuals from the British Channel and the Mediterranean ones. In particular, he reports the opinion of Quatrefages, who declares that the Mediterranean Myxicola: “[…] surely have any relationship with Montagu’s Sabella Infundibulum”. However, this opinion was linked to a misconception of Quatrefages, who considered the specimens from Montagu a true Sabella (Quatrefages Citation1866, p. 557). Claparède, instead, states that specimens from Salt Stone and from the Gulf of Naples belong to the same species, or, if not, they are very similar. In fact, he reports that the description of Montagu coincides with the characters observed in the individuals from Naples, except for the length, number of segments and number of radioles (9–10 cm in length against 20–25 cm; 115–125 segments against up to 160; and 20 pairs of radioles against 37). Claparède also describes the presence of dark eye spots, 25 µm in diameter and constituted by a crystalline substance surrounded by pigments, placed behind most of the fascicles of setae. In the paper by Lo Bianco (Citation1893) the author had already placed “Renier” (Citation1847) as the first description of the species, instead of Montagu (Citation1808). He reports a body length of up to 12 cm with a crown length of up to 2.5 cm and around 120 setigers in total (8 thoracic), which he defined as bi-ringed (surely linked to the peculiar disposition of the abdominal uncini). Notably, he reports the first segment as devoid of chaetae, which he describes as capillaries elongated at the extremity, and the whole thorax as devoid of uncini. The abdominal uncini are reported as bi-rostrate. Moreover, a group of interramal eyespots located posteriorly to most bundles of chaetae and a distinct ventral groove is reported. The crown is described as having 20 pairs of radioles with a high number of pinnulae, which stop at the end of the palmate membrane, leaving only the distal end of the radiole to extend beyond it (this means that the palmate membrane end, pinnulae ending point and radiole distal end starting point more or less coincide). Iroso (Citation1921) reported only the presence of the species, without a description of the specimens.

The colouration is also consistent, with a dark-violet crown maintaining a more intense colouration both on the dorsal side of the radioles and in their distal end, while the body is reported as brick-like in colour with some pasty transversal bands (which were not observed in our individuals).

What is apparent is that we cannot be sure that the descriptions from Montagu and Renier refer to the same species, and that the species described by Montagu as M. infundibulum is actually present in the Mediterranean area. In the present paper we followed the indication of WoRMS (2022) considering M. infundibulum sensu Montagu as the type species, considering the better quality of the description as well.

After these first findings, the species was later reported outside Mediterranean and English waters, up to South Africa, North America, Japan and Australia (Fauvel Citation1927; Day Citation1961; Imajima Citation1968; Goldman & Chandler Citation1986; Høisæter Citation1989; Langton & Robinson Citation1990; Hayward & Ryland Citation1995), also displaying a large range of substrata (Smith & Carlton Citation1975), from intertidal to deeper and open waters (Mikac et al. Citation2013). This, however, was also due to the extensive synonymization of several described species with this taxon. At present, this remarkable ecological flexibility, together with the global distribution, has led to uncertainties around the status of M. infundibulum, as it is referred to in different sources in the literature as either cosmopolitan or introduced (Smith & Carlton Citation1975; Boyd et al. Citation2002), suggesting the existence of numerous overlooked taxa.

The process of synonymization of most of the past described taxa with M. infundibulum, resulting in its cosmopolitan distribution, was started by Fauvel (Citation1927), who synonymized M. sarsi Krøyer, Citation1856, M. grubii Krøyer, Citation1856, M. modesta Quatrefages, Citation1866 and M. parasites Quatrefages, Citation1866, plus M. infundibulum both sensu Claparède (Citation1870) and sensu Lo Bianco (Citation1893), making the description of M. infundibulum, present in Fauvel (Citation1927), a mixture of descriptions from all the historically analysed material. As already mentioned, Phyllis Knight-Jones, in her contribution to the Handbook of the Marine Fauna of the British Isles and Northwest Europe (Hayward & Ryland Citation1990), listed M. sarsi as a valid species for the UK with a northern distribution. In the same guide, she described M. infundibulum as having a more southern distribution, and one of the distinguishing features between them was the presence (M. infundibulum) or absence (M. sarsi) of dark tips to the radioles. Officially, however, M. infundibulum is still the accepted name covering both forms.

2. Currently recognized species within the genus Myxicola

According to what was reported in WoRMS, of the 24 nominal Myxicola species, at the present, only eight are considered valid (); the distribution of these eight species is shown in .

Table I. Species described in the Myxicola genus (*sensu Hayward & Ryland Citation1990) in the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS).

Figure 1. Distribution of the genus Myxicola worldwide. For codes, see .

Figure 1. Distribution of the genus Myxicola worldwide. For codes, see Table I.

As a whole, Myxicola taxa can be divided into two groups according to the number of thoracic chaetigers: taxa having five or fewer thoracic chaetigers (“aesthetica group”) and taxa having eight or nine thoracic chaetigers (“infundibulum group”). Although taxa having fewer than five chaetigers often are small-sized forms, as observed by Capa and Murray (Citation2015), the number of thoracic chaetigers is not always linked to size.

All the accepted species listed thus far share the presence of sufficiently complete descriptions, except for M. sarsi which is mostly lacking what can be considered a true description. All we know for this species is that “[… it has] a cylindrical form, color smooth, with no distinct spots or rings, 12 pairs of gills and 11” of length for the whole animal” (Krøyer Citation1856, p. 9). Also, the type locality is not reported, even if it can be deduced from Krøyer’s general area of study; in the same work Krøyer describes M. steenstrupi from Greenland. Thus, we are not surprised that Capa and Murray (Citation2015) report only six valid species for the genus Myxicola, in addition to M. nana, described in the same article.

Among the accepted species, M. aesthetica and M. nana are easily recognizable thanks to their small dimensions and low number of thoracic segments (<6), with the latter differentiated from the former by a low palmate membrane, presence of a pair of subdistal radiolar eyes and the presence of six teeth of homogeneous size on the main fang, in abdominal uncini. Moreover, M. nana is known from soft-bottom environments in the Corals Sea (Lizard Island, Queensland, Australia), while M. aesthetica is commonly reported on hard substrata or as an epifaunal component of calcareous algae, with an original Mediterranean distribution (Tyrrhenian Sea, Gulf of Naples, Naples, Italy). Other small species of this genus are M. ommatophora Grube, Citation1878 and M. fauveli Potts, Citation1928. The first comes from the Philippine Archipelago and shares with M. nana the presence of subdistal radiolar eyes, but it shows 8 thoracic segments, together with a high number of abdominal segments (116 against 30) and radioles (19–24 pairs against 6 pairs) and a higher palmate membrane (reaching the radiolar tip), making it easily distinguishable from the Australian species. The latter species, described from the Red Sea (Suez Canal, Egypt), shows 8 thoracic segments, an intermediate number of abdominal segments (60–70) and 12 pairs of radioles; peculiarities of this species are an inconspicuous palmate membrane and the subdivision of the radiolar tip into a proximal half, characterized by a lateral prolongation of the radiolar flanges terminating with a round edge, where a concentration of “hyaline cells”, resembling eyespots, is present, and a bare radiolar tip.

A similar general morphology is shared by M. sulcata Ehlers, Citation1912, from the Ross Sea (Victoria Land, Southern Ocean) and re-described by Tovar-Hernández et al. (Citation2017) from the Patagonian Shelf. This species, reported for a variety of depths and substrata (from intertidal to 83 m depth; from sand to coarse sand and shells, to dock pilings) is still a small-sized species, with 8 thoracic and 35–72 abdominal segments and 12–17 pairs of radioles, but with a high palmate membrane.

The last accepted species is M. violacea (Langerhans, Citation1884) from Madeira Islands (Portugal), which is the second smallest reported species (23 mm with the crown), with 8 thoracic, 30–50 abdominal segments and 11 pairs of radioles connected by a high palmate membrane; an interesting set of features is also present, with the presence of peristomial (2 pairs), interramal (one each segment from fourth thoracic segment) and pygidial eyes (6), a radiolar skeleton composed of a row of single hyaline cells and the alternation of larger and smaller abdominal uncini along the tori. The presence of a ciliated epithelium that covers the whole peristomium has also been reported.

Among the remaining 14 listed species (), taxa having five or fewer thoracic chaetigers were synonymized with the M. aesthetica group (M. dinardeensis Saint-Joseph Citation1894 and M. glacialis Bush Citation1905), whilst taxa having eight or nine thoracic chaetigers were synonymized with M. infundibulum (M. affinis Bush Citation1905, M. conjucta 1905, M. grubii and M. steenstrupi Krøyer 1856, M. modesta and M. parasites Quatrefages Citation1866, M. pacifica Johnson Citation1901, M. monacis Chamberlin Citation1919, M. viridis McIntosh Citation1923, M. platychaeta Marenzeller Citation1884, M. michaelseni Augener Citation1918). Fauvel (Citation1927) synonymized four of the taxa now under the name “infundibulum”.

3. Historical roots of the cosmopolitan status of Myxicola infundibulum

The synonymization of several species with M. infundibulum stood for more than 70 years (1847–1923), but the quality of the descriptions oscillated dramatically over time, featuring down in-depth works as well as rough ones. This vacillation seems to be not related to the age of the studies. This does not allow us to treat all the descriptions in the same way; we must rely more on the more complete ones. Moreover, most of the descriptions do not contain comparable illustrations, and the location of type material is usually not stated.

On the other hand, the distribution of the proposed taxa appears to be almost global (except for Antarctic waters), and mostly in the northern hemisphere, but this may be due to a sampling bias as well as to “extrinsic factors” (“author effect” sensu Giangrande and Licciano Citation2004).

We proceeded to examine the descriptions of all the species synonymized with M. infundibulum through the evaluation of all available original works.

Myxicola affinis Bush, Citation1905 (Tubicolous annelids of the tribes Sabellides and Serpulides from the Pacific Ocean. Harriman Alaska Expedition). Type locality Pacific Grove, California, USA.

Body with 8 thoracic segments and 50 abdominal ones. Colour yellow. Body metrics cannot be used in this study, as both body length and first segment length are 4.5 mm (probably a copying error). Crown showing 20 pairs of radioles and very long pinnulae which are greenish in colour. The crown length is 12 mm, 3 mm of which comprises the slender and tapered radiolar tips only. Broadly hooded chaetae and thoracic uncini stouter and less curved.

Myxicola conjuncta Bush, Citation1905 (Tubicolous annelids of the tribes Sabellides and Serpulides from the Pacific Ocean. Harriman Alaska Expedition). Type locality Alaska Pacific coast.

Body yellowish, tapered towards both anterior and posterior end, with 8 thoracic biannulate segments and 107 abdominal. There are 20 pairs of radioles of pale colour, with numerous and very long pinnulae, of intense brown colour; palmate membrane high, just leaving the radiole distal ends, relatively long and tapered, unadorned and free. The halves of the crown are separated ventrally by a triangular fleshy lobe. The largest individuals described were 120 mm long, of which 17 mm comprised the crown. The author reported also shape-changing chaetae, describing long chaetae with short and broad blade terminating in a slender capillary end in the first segment, arranged in circle, and more slender and longer chaetae, with spear-like blade or hastate and long, slender capillary end, in the inner art of the tuft of segments from the sixth to the eighth; only two thoracic uncini each segment are reported. Abdominal chaetae with simple spear and long, slender ends are present; abdominal uncini are characterized by a long and slender main fang, with only one close shorter tooth. No eyes were described.

Myxicola grubii Krøyer, Citation1856; (Afhandling om Ormeslaegten Sabella Linn., isaer med Hensyn til dens nordiske Arter [Alternate title: Bidrag til Kundskab af Sabellerne]. Oversigt over det Kongelige danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger).

The type locality of this taxon reported by WoRMS is the “Danish Exclusive Economic zone”. However, Krøyer specified that the species occurs in the North Adriatic Sea (Trieste).

Body stockier, of pallid pink colour, with a series of dorsal-posterior darker spots; 45–49 segments and width 1/8 of the length. Crown purple with reddish pinnulae, from medium to very short length (1/4 of the body length); 21–24 pairs of radioles, with short radiolar tips, most of them spiralized; buccal cirri (probably dorsal radiolar appendages) very short, club-shape. Body metrics are reported in “pollices” (from Latin, the language in which the description is made), 2.5 for M. grubii and 10 for M. infundibulum. However, it is not reported whether the unit of measure refers to the Latin one, the English one, or some German other, and thus any comparison with other species remains impossible.

Myxicola michaelseni Augener, Citation1918 (Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas). Type locality Namibian Exclusive Economic Zone.

Colouration ranging from a yellowish-gray to whitish with purple shading. Segments more or less distinctly two-ringed, 8 in the thorax and up to 80–90 in the abdomen in the larger individuals. Crown ¼–1/6 length of body, holding up to 19 pairs of radioles (the number of radioles increases with the size of the individuals). Radiolar tip very long, up to half of the length of the whole radiole, with an elongated lanceolate shape; palmate membrane low (the author reports a great variability in the height of the palmate membrane, with some individuals showing membrane just reaching the radiolar tip and others having membrane extending well beyond that point). Thoracic hooks showing two close-fitting, pointed secondary teeth over the main fang, with a tertiary unpaired tooth visible above and between the two secondary teeth, which can hardly be seen in profile; abdominal hooks with a short secondary tooth. The author reports the presence of a row of thin black points on each segment, reduced to 1 or 2 on the chest (= thorax?), with a high probability of interramal eyespots, as the same Augener describes for the pygidium ([…] a row of small black dots, at least ocelli). Interestingly, the absence of radiolar eyes was assessed, as well as the structure of ventral and dorsal lips:

The buccal tentacles, sometimes tinged with a faint purplish color, are triangular, fairly broad, compressed, flap-like processes that rise above the ventral margin of the head and protrude about twice the mid-ventral lobe of the collar: they can also be shorter and be less compressed. The two halves of the head at the base of which the gill leaves rise laterally to the outside. There are two fleshy ear-shaped structures separated by a deep incision, the concave side wall of which is repeatedly indented. The tentacles arise ventrally and internally at the lower ends of the halves of the head. (p. 590)

Myxicola modesta Quatrefages, Citation1866 (Histoire naturelle des Annelés marins et d’eau douce. Annélides et Géphyriens. Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret. Paris). Type locality St. Vaast, Normandy, France. Body brown-greenish, conical, with 8–9 thoracic segments and 41–42 abdominal ones. Head just distinct from the rest of the body, with 2 eyes. Eleven pairs of long radioles with short pinnulae; palmate membrane height, up to the extremity of the radioles. A fascicle of maximum 9 chaetae on each segment’s side, curved and enlarged towards the tip, with a highly stepped disposition with respect to each other. The author did not find thoracic chaetae or lateral/pygidial eyes, but he underlined that this may be due to a preservation bias. Pygidium with mamelon shape that the author believes to be the location of sight. Interesting behavioural observations seem related to this in particular, as the animal appears to be not sedentary, often exiting the tube just secreted and moving with the pygidium in front and the crown folded. Quatrefages reported the lifestyle of both his Myxicola species as being similar to Amphicorini’s species.

Myxicola pacifica Johnson, Citation1901 (The Polychaeta of the Puget Sound region. Proceedings of the Boston Society for Natural History). Type locality Puget Sound.

Body fusiform, with 9 thoracic and 58–88 abdominal segments, short and bi-annulated. Thoracic segments are hardly distinguishable from the abdominal ones. Fourteen pairs of radioles; very high palmate membrane (up to 3 mm from the tip). Largest individual with a body length of 60 mm and crown length of 21 mm. As for M. conjuncta, different types of thoracic chaetae are reported: a more abundant classical hooded chaeta, capillary and very slender and a fewer blunt, spinous chaetae with conical tip. Thoracic uncini with long manubrium, strong main fang and minute teeth. Abdominal chaetae minute and broadly hooded; abdominal uncini very small, with 2–3 teeth over the main fang.

Myxicola parasites Quatrefages, Citation1866 (Histoire naturelle des Annelés marins et d’eau douce. Annélides et Géphyriens. Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret. Paris). Type locality unknown.

Body cylindrical, of 20–22 mm length, brown, with 40 segments well defined; head well distinct from the rest of the body, forming a ring that brings the crown and two nuchal eyes. Nine radioles (not specified if pairs or not) separated each other by large festoon; pinnulae thin but long, coloured with live decise green (due to haemolymph). Palmate membrane is very thin and high (as in M. modesta, see above). Two lateral eyes each segment and 4 pygidial eyes.

Myxicola platychaeta Marenzeller, Citation1884 (Südjapanische Anneliden. II. Ampharetea, Terebellacea, Sabellacea, Serpulacea. Denkschriften der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien). Type locality Japanese Exclusive Economic Zone.

Body cylindrical, yellowish-reddish, the first segments tinged with garnet violet, with 82 segments (9 of which thoracic, one achaetous) slightly ringing. Crown 1/3 the length of the body, with 16 pairs of radioles, connected by a high palmate membrane, although the poor state of preservation makes it difficult to understand how far it extends). In the second thoracic chaetiger only hooded chaetae present, while from the third appear also broad, coarse and curved chaetae that the author considers equated to thoracic uncini of other Myxicola species, but without indentations. Abdominal uncini reported as an “actual hooked bristle”. No eyes observed.

Myxicola steenstrupi Krøyer, Citation1856 (Afhandling om Ormeslaegten Sabella Linn., isaer med Hensyn til dens nordiske Arter [Alternate title: Bidrag til Kundskab af Sabellerne]. Oversigt over det Kongelige danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger). Type locality Greenland; however, the same taxon was reported from the Bay of Fundy by Bush (Citation1905).

Body golden to orange in colour, stocky, 8 thoracic segments, longer than wide; 46–52 abdominal segments, shorter. Body total length of 2.5 inches and maximum width 1/6–1/7 of the body length. Crown long, more than 1/3 of the body length, with 17–21 pairs of radioles; long radiolar tip, almost 1/3 of the crown length. Pinnulae are very long and thin, rigid and wavy, up to 1/3 of the radiole length. Buccal cirri (probably dorsal radiolar appendages) sublaminar in shape, elongated-triangular, shorter than 1/16 of the radioles. Anus terminal. Chaetal brushes are poorly visible in the anterior part of the body and disappear in the posterior part. Chaetae are numerous but small and thin. Tori with uncini not found by the author.

The very poor description of M. villosa Koch, 1847, refers to the work of Giuseppe Meneghini already reported in a previous paragraph.

Myxicola viridis McIntosh, Citation1923, Type locality Atlantic Ocean, British Isles (A monograph of the British marine annelids. Polychaeta, Sabellidae to Serpulidae. With additions to the British marine Polychaeta during the publication of the monograph. Ray Society of London). Body green in colour, elongated, 8 thoracic segments, longer than wide; 39 abdominal segments. Crown with 9–14 pairs of radioles, which fold into a spiral when closed; strap-like short radiolar tip, different from the elongated one seen in M. infundibulum. Peristomium with triangular lobe similar to the one of M. infundibulum. Pygidium papilliform. Peristomial chaetal tuft directed obliquely outward; narrowly hooded chaetae, with thoracic ones larger than abdominal ones. Thoracic uncini acicular, with short and sharp main fang, markedly curved, with only one tooth above it. Abdominal uncini with long and sharp main fang, with one tooth above it long almost as the fang itself; basal posterior prolongation is present.

In addition, we decided to not rely on the description of M. monacis Chamberlin, Citation1919, Type locality Laguna Beach, California (holdfast of seaweed) (New polychaetous annelids from Laguna Beach, California. Journal of Entomology and Zoology of Pomona College), because of its poor quality and approximation of information.

Lastly, a problem of misspelling is present concerning M. sarsii, and M. sarsi. In the same work Kröyer (Citation1856), reports both taxa, considering M. sarsii a synonym for M. infundibulum and M. sarsi a valid species, and this is also reported in WoRMS. However, as already mentioned, a good description is present only for M. sarsii, whilst no description at all is available for M. sarsi. Moreover, Knight-Jones in Hayward and Ryland (Citation1990) listed M. sarsi as a species occurring in English waters. However, as no real description by Knight-Jones nor type specimens are present, the presence of this taxon remains uncertain (T. Darbyshire pers. comm.). In the present paper we have considered M. sarsii a valid species ().

Among the reported taxa synonymized with M. infundibulum we can recognize three groups based on the number of abdominal chaetigers: the first hosts species with a low number of chaetigers (70<)including M. affinis, M. grubii, M. modesta, M. parasites, M. viridis and M. steenstrupi; while M. pacifica, M. michaelseni and M. platychaeta possess an intermediate number (60–90 chaetigers) and only M. conjuncta has up to 100 or more chaetigers, similarly to M. infundibulum sensu Montagu. For most of the analysed species 8 thoracic chaetigers are reported; the exceptions are M. affinis, M. conjuncta and M. platychaeta with 9 thoracic segments. However, we believe that, as for the latter, the peristomium, achaetous, is included in the numeration.

A great variability in the number of radioles across the different species is also present. Here at least two groups can be recovered (we can take into account only the number reported for each species because is not uncommon for preserved materials to lose some body elements, such as the radioles): M. affinis, M. conjuncta, M. grubii and M. steenstrupi have 20 or more pairs of radioles, with a number oscillating between 20 and 24 pairs, while M. modesta, M. parasites, M. platychaeta, M. viridis and M. pacifica have all fewer than 20 pairs of radioles. In particular, M. affinis, M. viridis and M. conjuncta have a very low number of radioles reported, 11 pairs, 9 to 14 pairs, and 9 (not specified whether pairs) respectively, while M. michaelseni has up to 19 pairs of radioles, and probably can be inserted in the first group.

Only Augener and Krøyer took into account the crown/body length ratio, with 1/4–1/6 for M. michaelseni, 1/4 for M. grubii and more than 1/3 for M. steenstrupi, while for M. platychaeta, M. conjuncta and M. pacifica the lengths of the two body elements are reported, allowing us to calculate their ratio (1/3, 1/6 and 1/3, respectively); for all the other taxa no information was reported about this feature.

We must acknowledge that almost all the authors paused on the characteristics of crown, describing it more or less in detail; in this, the description by Augener is the most complete description of the structure of the lips and their appendages. Chaetae and uncini were also poorly described, with some descriptions reporting both thoracic and abdominal ones, and others with just the thoracic ones or without any references. The description of M. viridis is an exception, with both thoracic and abdominal uncini reported in great detail. In fact, M. viridis shows a peculiar abdominal uncinal shape, characterized by the presence of a basal posterior prolongation recalling a handle. It should be noted that for M. conjuncta and M. pacifica a set of shape-changing chaetae, new for the genus, is reported, while the description of M. platychaeta suggests the presence of acicular abdominal uncini. Good drawings of the chaetae are present also for M. affinis.

Generally, however, not all descriptions are accompanied by good illustrations.

The presence and disposition of eyes were described for M. michaelseni, M. modesta and M. parasites, with the former and the latter having the whole set of eyes on the body (nuchal, interramal/lateral and pygidial), while the second has only nuchal eyes. In any case, Augener is the only author who went in search of radiolar eyes, while for the last two species Quatrefages suggests the pygidium as the location of sight, as both taxa were observed moving outside the tube with the pygidium in front and crown folded behind. For M. modesta this should be supported by the mamelon shape of the pygidium.

Lastly, a very problematic situation concerns M. grubii, as the description from Kröyer (Citation1856) is not the product of the examination of new material, but is the direct copy of the description of a specimen from Trieste by Grube (Citation1855), identified as M. infundibulum. Grube (Citation1850) enstablished the genus Eriographis, without a clear definition (except for the occurrence of a mucus tube), and the species Eriographis borealis, without any description, which should be regarded as a nomen nudum (as already pointed out by Kröyer Citation1856). Subsequently, Grube (Citation1855) described the above-cited specimen from Trieste as M. infundibulum and stated its identity with E. borealis. Since the description reported a different taxon with respect to M. infundibulum and with E. borealis being a nomen nudum, Kröyer (Citation1856) gave the name of M. grubii to the specimens described by Grube, completely relying on this last author’s description.

Part II. Taxonomic account

Family Sabellidae Latreille, 1825

Genus Myxicola Koch in Renier, Citation1847

Type species Myxicola infundibulum Montagu, Citation1808

Myxicola sp. 1 ()

Figure 2. Myxicola sp. 1. (a) entire worm; (b) peristomial mid-lateral incision; (c, d) scheme of the peristomal ring: (c) ventral view; (d) dorsal view; (e) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (f) radiolar tip; (g) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bars: b, f = 1 mm.

Figure 2. Myxicola sp. 1. (a) entire worm; (b) peristomial mid-lateral incision; (c, d) scheme of the peristomal ring: (c) ventral view; (d) dorsal view; (e) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (f) radiolar tip; (g) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bars: b, f = 1 mm.

Figure 3. Myxicola sp. 1. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th thoracic uncini; (e) 24th abdominal uncinus, lateral view and scheme of teeth above the main fang. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Figure 3. Myxicola sp. 1. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th thoracic uncini; (e) 24th abdominal uncinus, lateral view and scheme of teeth above the main fang. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Material examined

1 individual collected from the British channel on the Cornwall coast [50°07′53.7″N, 5°03′46.2″W] 1989, intertidal, fixed in 4% formaldehyde and preserved in 70% ethanol (PCZL S.M. 2.1).

Description

Body yellowish (original colouration probably lost due to fixation), cylindrical but flattened dorso-ventrally (), 7 cm long, crown light brown measuring 1.9 cm, ratio between body and crown length 3.7. Nine thoracic chaetigers and 122 abdominal segments. Glandular girdle close to the posterior edge of the second thoracic chaetiger. Thorax longer than wide. Peristomium higher and triangular ventrally, gently decreasing laterally, leaving visible radiolar lobes and showing a mid-lateral incision that appears to split the same into a ventral and a dorsal half (). Dorsal lips with very short and club-like radiolar appendages, just protruding from the ventral lips, colour unknown (). Pinnular appendages absent; ventral radiolar appendages absent, ventral lips developed and enlarging, extending dorsoventrally along inner surface of base of radiolar lobes and connecting ventrally to the radiolar lobes by a sheet of tissue; parallel lamellae and ventral sacs absent. Crown holding 23 radioles on one lobe and 25 on the other. Despite the loss of colouration, the outer surface of the radioles shows a darker rachis, as well as a darker colouration of the inner surface of the whole crown; radiolar tip not darker than the rest of the radiole. Palmate membrane high, running up to the start of the radiolar tip extended into radiolar flanges of the radiolar tip, enlarging into auricles that wear thin along the same, giving it a triangular shape; radiolar tip blunt (), between 1/5 and 1/6 of the radiole length. Radiolar skeleton composed of 2 cells surrounded by a hyaline matrix, external margin bilobed (). Pinnulae thin, curly and short, around 1/9 of the radiole length, with rounded tip, disposed in strict alternation along the radiole; longer pinnulae located at the distal end of the first half of the radiole, and after decreasing gently in length. Radiolar eyes not visible. Peristomial eyes not visible. Neither interramal nor pygidial eyes visible. Numerous narrowly hooded thoracic notochaetae with long tip, disposed circularly to form a tuft; in the first chaetiger the chaetae are similar to the other thoracic chaetae, but with a shorter and slightly broader hood (). Thoracic uncini from second thoracic chaetiger, curved, with a long fang and a series of distinct small teeth in the first half (). Abdominal uncini with two large, distinct apical teeth, not reaching half of the main fang length; breast rounded, main fang shorter than the breast (). Abdominal neurochaetae narrowly hooded, almost identical to first chaetiger notochaetae ().

Remarks

The examined specimen is in a poor state of preservation, allowing us to analyse only some of the characters used for other specimens, and only the analysis and drawings of the individual performed by one of the authors (AG) in past years gave us access to the inner structures of the crown (lips height and radiolar appendages shape). For these reasons we have decided to not classify this specimen into a new taxon, until new, fresh materials can be examined.

The specimen was collected close to the type locality of M. infundibulum (sensu Montagu), but it seems to differ from the material collected by Darbyshire (Citation2019) in the same area, which shows a dark tip of radioles. Despite the absence of a description of uncini and chaetae, our specimen clearly groups with the other UK form indicated by Darbyshire, showing “white-tipped” radioles. However, an appreciable difference is present in the shape of the triangular lobe, which appears to be more developed in the material by Darbyshire. Comparing our material with the description of Montagu, the size is greatly different, with the specimen from Montagu being almost 3 times larger than our specimen. The same goes for the number of radioles (37 pairs against a maximum of 25). It can be hypothesized that our specimen is just a smaller individual, but the high number of segments (>130) makes it difficult to believe that the specimen was not an adult. Also, alteration of specimens due to preservation and fixation could explain morphometric variation, but it should only account for a shrinking near 50%. Moreover, the difference between our material and Montagu’s description is reinforced by the fact that in the description of Montagu, dark radiolar tips are reported, confirming that its material belongs to the “black-tipped” taxon reported by Darbyshire (Citation2019).

We wish to underline that important differences are also present comparing our material with the M. infundibulum description of Fauvel (Citation1927), in both qualitative aspects, such as the shape of peristomium, and quantitative aspects, such as the number of radioles, which is reported to be up to 40 pairs. However, the description and the drawings reported in Fauvel are quite unclear, and, as already mentioned, it probably is a mixture of characters from different taxa synonymized with M. infundibulum.

Lastly, differences from the other accepted species are based on the number of thoracic segments (9 compared with 3–5 for M. aesthetica and M. nana), the palmate membrane and radiolar tip (respectively, inconspicuous and characterized by lateral prolongations of the radiolar flanges terminating with a group of “hyaline cells” in M. fauveli), macroscopic radiolar eyes (present in M. ommatophora in subdistal position as well as acicular abdominal uncini), peristomial eyes and radiolar skeleton, respectively present and composed just by 1 row of hyaline cells in M. violacea, and thoracic uncini with a single tooth above the main fang in M. sulcata, as well as longer dorsal radiolar appendages.

Myxicola sp. 2 ()

Figure 4. Myxicola sp. 2. (a) entire worm from Naples; (b, c) scheme of the peristomal ring: (b) ventral view; (c) lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) pygidium; (f) radiolar tip; (g) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bar: b, c = 2 mm; d, f = 1 mm, e = 0.5 mm.

Figure 4. Myxicola sp. 2. (a) entire worm from Naples; (b, c) scheme of the peristomal ring: (b) ventral view; (c) lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) pygidium; (f) radiolar tip; (g) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bar: b, c = 2 mm; d, f = 1 mm, e = 0.5 mm.

Figure 5. Myxicola sp. 2. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th thoracic uncinus; (e) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Figure 5. Myxicola sp. 2. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th thoracic uncinus; (e) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

as Myxicola infundibulum (Eisig, 1910); (Gambi et al., Citation1982)

Material examined

3 specimens collected in the Gulf of Naples in the 1910 and identified as M. infundibulum by Eisig in the same year, fixed in 4% formaldehyde and preserved in 70% ethanol, Darwin Dohrn Museum of the Stazione Zoologica of Naples (Pol. 200, 1910/6/9 318), 3 additional specimens collected during 1985 from the same locality, fixed in 4% formaldehyde and preserved in 70% ethanol (PCZL S.M. 4.1).

Description

A quite markedly elongated body, cylindrical and yellowish in colour, crown light brown with darker tips (). The specimen measures 8.9 cm in body length with 1.65 cm of crown. Eight thoracic chaetigers and 100 abdominal segments. Thorax longer than wide. Glandular girdle close to the posterior edge of the second thoracic chaetiger. Peristomium 2.15 mm high, with an anterior fleshy triangular lobe, rounded, with a barely outlined tip, that divides the crown into two halves ventrally. High ventrally and dorsally, it remains high also laterally, maintaining a more squared shape and showing with a more rounded shape only near mid-lateral incision; junction between body and crown not visible (). Crown holds 23 pairs of radioles; ratio between body and crown length of 5.4. Dorsal lips with elongated, triangular-shaped radiolar appendages (), more flattened dorso-ventrally and with a thinning tip and purple colouration. Pinnular appendages absent; ventral radiolar appendages absent, ventral lips rounded and developed, but low, extending dorsoventrally along inner surface of base of radiolar lobes and connecting ventrally to the radiolar lobes by a sheet of tissue; parallel lamellae and ventral sacs absent. Radioles light in colour at the base of the radiole on the outer surface, becoming progressively dark (brown) especially at the radiolar tip (), connected by a lighter, semi-transparent palmate membrane that runs up to the start of the radiolar tip. Here it follows the radiolar tip, extending into radiolar flanges that give to the structure a quite markedly lanceolate shape. The radiolar tip of this taxon is quite short, with a rounded tip (1/8 of the radiole length). Pinnulae thin, between 1/4 and 1/5 of the radiole length, with rounded and slightly swollen end tip, disposed in pairs along the radiole; the longer pinnulae are located in the distal half of the radiole, then rapidly decrease in length towards the radiolar tip. Radiolar skeleton composed of 2 cells surrounded by a hyaline matrix, radiolar external edge rounded (). Peristomial eyes not visible. Interramal eyes not visible. Pygidium squared and papilliform, well developed antero-dorsally, pygidial eyes not visible (). Numerous narrowly hooded thoracic notochaetae with long tip, disposed circularly to form a tuft; in the first chaetiger the chaetae are similar to the other thoracic chaetae, but with a shorter and slightly broader hood (). Thoracic uncini curved, with a long main fang but no teeth observed above it (). Abdominal uncini showing one large tooth above the main fang, or two with one larger and longer than the other; two small teeth with one smaller apically to them are found rarely (). Breast rounded and long, without handle, main fang shorter than the breast. Abdominal neurochaetae narrowly hooded ().

Remarks

The specimens of this taxon all show a markedly elongated and cylindrical body shape, with the smaller, the medium and the larger specimens having, respectively, 94, 127 and 129 abdominal segments, for a body length from 8 to 12.5 cm. The crown shows a constant length, being 1.6 cm for the larger specimen and 1.7 cm for the smaller two. As a result, the mean ratio between crown and body length is 5.91 ± 1.26.

The description by Fauvel of M. infundibulum shares a set of macro-characteristics with the material from the Gulf of Naples here examined: a maximum length not exceeding 10 cm for fewer than 140 segments, a crown at least 3 times shorter than the body, radioles with purple rachis, high palmate membrane, some shading of darker colour towards the anterior end, and absence of macroscopic eyes; but, as we already pointed out, the description and the drawings reported in Fauvel (Citation1927) seem to be a mixture of characters from descriptions of different material from different sites, including that from the Gulf of Naples.

The presently analysed material comes from the same locality as the materials identified as M. infundibulum by Claparède (Citation1870) Lo Bianco (Citation1893), and Iroso (Citation1921). A comparison with their description shows many similarities arise: the specimens’ size is consistent, with Claparède reporting a length around 10 cm for 115–125 segments and 20 pairs of radioles, while Lo Bianco reported a length of 12 cm for 120 segments. Moreover, both reported 8 thoracic chaetigers. However, some differences can be found. For example, Claparède described the presence of interramal eyes; the absence of them in our material may be an artefact from long lasting in fixed status. Lo Bianco described a longer crown (2.5 cm vs 1.7 cm) and the absence of thoracic uncini and “bi-rostrate” abdominal uncini. We believe that the absence of thoracic uncini can be explained by the objective difficulty in finding them, as even with modern instrumentation they require a careful preparation of the slide to be observed, while the “bi-rostrate” status of the abdominal uncini is consistent with their appearance when lying on one side.

This taxon appears closer to the “black-tipped” one from English waters Darbyshire (Citation2019), sharing an elongated body shape and a decreased crown/body length ratio. However, it can be differentiated especially by the shape of the triangular lobe (clearly divided ventral-medially into sub-lobes), by the length of the radiolar tip (longer and tapering) and by the shape of the radiolar appendages (shorter and flattened dorso-ventrally). Moreover, in specimens from Naples, the colour of the crown is darker along most of its length, and not only on the tip of radioles. Differences can be found also with respect to Montagu’s description of M. cf. infundibulum, especially in size, number of segments and number of radioles. Lastly, other than the darker tip of the radiole, the shape of the triangular lobe distinguishes this taxon from the English “white-tipped” form.

Differences from the other accepted species are related to the number of thoracic segments, which separate this taxon from M. aesthetica and M. nana (8 vs 3–5); to the radiolar tip morphology and the absence of macroscopic eyes, which helps us to separate it from M. fauveli and M. ommatophora (showing, respectively, lateral prolongations of the radiolar flanges terminating with a group of “hyaline cells” and macroscopic radiolar eyes in subdistal position). The radiolar skeleton allows us to differentiate it from M. violacea (which shows just 1 row of hyaline cells), while thoracic uncini and lip structure separate it from M. sulcata (which has a single tooth above the main fang as well as longer dorsal radiolar appendages).

This taxon’s presence in the Gulf of Naples seems to be firm, since it has been collected from the mid-19th century to the late 20th, as other individuals were collected from Pozzuoli (Gulf of Naples, Campania, Italy) (40°48ʹ52.0”N, 14°09ʹ27.7”E), in 1985.

Although the examined features lead us to consider it a different species to M. infundibulum and probably a new taxon, we need fresh material to be collected before we can provide a good description and clarify its systematic position.

Myxicola cosentini Putignano et al. Citation2023 sp. nov.

as M. cf. infundibulum in Giangrande et al. Citation2012()

Figure 6. Myxicola cosentinii. (a) entire worm; (b, c) peristomial ring, ventral and lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) pygidium; (f) radiolar tip; (g) radiolar eyes. Scale bars: b, c = 2 mm; d, f = 1 mm; e = 0.5 mm; g = 0.1 mm.

Figure 6. Myxicola cosentinii. (a) entire worm; (b, c) peristomial ring, ventral and lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) pygidium; (f) radiolar tip; (g) radiolar eyes. Scale bars: b, c = 2 mm; d, f = 1 mm; e = 0.5 mm; g = 0.1 mm.

Figure 7. Myxicola cosentinii. (a) scheme of radiolar section; (b) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (d) 24th abdominal chaeta; (e) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus; (f) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view; Scale bar: b–f = 0.05 mm.

Figure 7. Myxicola cosentinii. (a) scheme of radiolar section; (b) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (d) 24th abdominal chaeta; (e) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus; (f) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view; Scale bar: b–f = 0.05 mm.

Holotype

Lake Faro [38.272318°N, 15.628438°E], 2007 collected at 0.5 m to 2 m, fixed in 4% formaldehyde and preserved in 70% ethanol. MNCN 16.01/19245.

Paratypes

9 specimens from the same locality, collected from 2007 to 2011. PCZL S. M. 7.1., one individual fixed in 96° ethanol for DNA analysis.

Description

Holotype complete, with body fully yellowish-light brown in colour, cylindrical, with peristomium slightly darker, crown darker especially on the tips (). The specimen measures 3.5 cm in body length, with 1.35 cm in crown length. Eight thoracic chaetigers and 90 abdominal segments. Glandular girdle close to the posterior edge of the second thoracic chaetiger. Thorax longer than wide. Peristomium 0.81 mm high, with an anterior fleshy triangular lobe, thin and divided into two slender tips by a median groove, that divides the crown into two halves ventrally. High ventrally and dorsally, it decreases laterally, showing the mid-lateral incision; junction between body and crown not visible (). Crown holds 18 radioles on one radiolar lobe and 20 on the other one; ratio between body and crown length 2.6. Dorsal lips with relatively long and club-like radiolar appendages of purple colouration. Pinnular appendages absent, ventral radiolar appendages absent, ventral lips less developed and low, extending dorsoventrally along inner surface of base of radiolar lobes and connecting ventrally to the radiolar lobes by a sheet of tissue; parallel lamellae and ventral sacs absent (). Radioles show purple rachis on the outer surface, light in colour at the base of the radiole and becoming progressively darker towards the tip, connected by a lighter, semi-transparent palmate membrane that runs up to the start of the radiolar tip. Here it follows the radiolar tip, extending into radiolar flanges that become progressively thinner, enhancing the extremely long and tapering appearance of the tip. Radiolar tip darker, long and filiform (<1/4 of the radiole length) (); a series of small, numerous eyespots are appreciable along the radiolar tips, disposed on the sides, up to the distal end (). Pinnulae thin, between 1/6 and 1/7 of the radiole length, with rounded tip, disposed in an alternate pattern along the radiole; the longer pinnulae are located in the distal half of the radiole, then rapidly decrease in length to the starting point of the radiolar tip. Radiolar skeleton composed of 2 cells surrounded by a hyaline matrix and with a bifurcate margin (). Peristomial eyes not visible. Interramal eyes visible from the fourth thoracic chaetiger, in the form of both single and paired eyespots; when in pairs the smaller one is posterior to the larger one. These shift into lateral eyes, as they move dorsally along the abdomen, increasing in number (up to 2–3 units each side) towards the pygidium and situated in a more dispersed way. In the segments immediately anterior to the pygidium, they increase both in number and in dispersion (up to 6 eyespots on each side). Pygidium antero-dorsally flat, with a disc-like shape, pygidial eyes not clearly appreciable (). Numerous narrowly hooded thoracic notochaetae with long tip, disposed circularly to form a tuft; in the first chaetiger the chaetae are similar to the other thoracic chaetae, but with a shorter and slightly broader hood (). Thoracic uncini curved, with few distinct teeth above the first half of the main fang (). Abdominal uncini showing either 2 long teeth above the main fang with one larger and longer than the other, or a single apical long tooth flanked by, at least, 2 small teeth each side slightly shorter than the main fang. Breast squared, main fang longer than the breast (), Abdominal neurochaetae narrowly hooded ().

Remarks

The size varies among individuals, from the smallest specimen of 2.25 cm body length and 1 cm crown length to 8 cm body length and 1.95 cm crown length in the largest, a mean value of 5.6 cm for the body and 1.6 cm for the crown. The ratio between body and crown length increases with size (from ½ to 1/5), but the relationship between increasing body and crown length remains similar (R2 = 0.83), excluding the only incomplete specimen (which is missing almost half of the body). Larger specimens show a higher number of segments than smaller ones, but some specimens had the very last segments damaged, making the relationship with size uncertain: the smallest specimen shows 70 segments, the largest 119 (although it may lack the very last setigers) while an intermediate one (e.g. 5.9 cm in body length) has 131 segments. Peristomium height increases linearly with body size (R2 = 0.83), with a mean length of 1.6 mm; the same goes for thorax length (R2 = 0.98). Crown holding an unequal number of radioles between radiolar lobes for all the specimens analysed; although this can be due to a poor state of preservation (loss of radioles), the sign of the presence of radioles, even if broken, was clear, making difficult to believe that this is not a state for this character peculiar to this species. The number of radioles increases with the size of specimens (R2 = 0.84), with the smallest having 16–17 radioles and the largest 20–23. No significant relationships between crown length, the length of the pinnulae and length of radiolar tip (with respect to the length of their radiole) were found in the statistical analysis.

This taxon shares with the “black-tipped” form of UK material (probably M. infundibulum s.s.) long and dark radiolar tips. However, the crown of M. cosentini is all darker in appearance; moreover, the continuation of the palmate membrane into radiolar flanges along the radiolar tip maintains a filiform aspect in the new taxon, while it is lanceolate in the English material. Further differences lie in the general shape of the animal, stockier and more flattened dorso-ventrally, and in the shape of the triangular lobe, which, despite being divided ventrally into two halves, is clearly longer and thinner. Lastly, the two forms differ in the shape of the radiolar appendages, which are longer and cylindrical in the new taxon. The size of the new taxon allows us to separate it also with respect to the original description of Montagu, while the shape of the triangular lobe and morphology of the radiolar tip differentiate it from the “white-tipped” English form.

The long radiolar tip clearly differentiates this species from all the other taxa collected along the Italian coast and examined in the present paper, as well as from M. sulcata; this feature, together with the whole structure of the radioles, differentiates this species also from M. fauveli and M. violacea. Finally, the absence of macroscopic radiolar eyes and the number of thoracic segments separate it from M. ommatophora, M. nana and M. aesthetica.

Comparison with the other new taxa presently described will be discussed in their respective Remarks sections.

Etymology

The species is named after Prof. Andrea Cosentino, who collected the specimens.

Distribution and ecology

Faro Lake, located within the Oriented Natural Reserve of Capo Peloro–Lago di Ganzirri (Ionian Sea), is a brackish-water environment connected to the Strait of Messina through open channels which is exploited for mollusc aquaculture. It shows ecoclines and environmental patchiness that make it highly exposed and attractive for allochthonous marine species. The area has therefore been cited as a hotspot for the entry and spread of alien marine species in the Central Mediterranean (Cosentino et al. Citation2009). In this environment have been reported the presence of the large-sized sabellid species Acromegalomma lanigerum (Grube, Citation1846), inhabiting the soft bottom at low depth with M. cosentinii sp. nov., Branchiomma boholense (Grube, Citation1878), inhabiting the hard bottom of the lake’s two seaward inlets and of the channel that connects the basin with the neighbouring lake of Ganzirri; and further observations of B. luctuosum.

Myxicola giuliae Putignano et al. Citation2023 sp. nov.

()

Figure 8. Myxicola giuliae. (a) entire worm; (b, c) peristomial ring, ventral and lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) pygidium; (f) radiolar tip; (g) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bars: b, c, f = 2 mm; d = 1 mm; e = 0.5 mm.

Figure 8. Myxicola giuliae. (a) entire worm; (b, c) peristomial ring, ventral and lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) pygidium; (f) radiolar tip; (g) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bars: b, c, f = 2 mm; d = 1 mm; e = 0.5 mm.

Figure 9. Myxicola giuliae. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus; (e) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Figure 9. Myxicola giuliae. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus; (e) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Holotype

Marina di Brindisi, Brindisi (Apulia, Italy) [40.659187°N, 17.963017°E] in March 2022 at 3–6 m depth and fixed in 70° ethanol. MNCN 16.01/19244.

Paratypes

7 specimens from the same locality and site, 4 of which lack the posterior part of the body. PCZL S.M. 5.2, two individuals fixed in 96° ethanol for DNA analysis; 1 specimen incomplete from the area of integral protection of Torre Guaceto MPA (Brindisi) [40.751067°N, 17.743967°E], collected he 15 September 2022 at 17 m depth and fixed in 70° ethanol (PCZL S.M. 5.3); 2 specimens (one incomplete) from Santa Caterina di Nardò [40.140614°N, 17.979802°E], collected the 11 September 2022 at 5–6 m depth and fixed in 70° ethanol (PCZL S.M. 5.4); 1 specimen incomplete from Mar Piccolo of Taranto [40.480487°N, 17.268607°E], collected the 13 October 2022 at 2–3 m depth and fixed in 70° ethanol (PCZL S.M. 5.6).

Description

Holotype complete, with body almost completely yellowish, just darker on the anterior end (but never purple), cylindrical, with the peristomium, especially the anterior edge of the peristomial ring, lighter in colour with respect to the rest of the thorax. Crown darker with darker tips (). Body length 4.4 cm, crown 1.7 cm; ratio between body and crown length of 2.6. Glandular girdle close to the posterior edge of the second thoracic chaetiger. Eight thoracic chaetigers and 101 abdominal segments. Thorax longer than wide. Peristomium 1.53 mm high, forming an anterior fleshy triangular lobe, but remaining quite high also on the lateral side where it forms mid-lateral incision and lateral notches with rounded edges (); junction between body and crown not visible. Clearly visible nephridiopores present from the third/fourth thoracic chaetigers along the whole body: in the thorax they are situated just latero-ventrally to the tori (contiguously to them), while in the abdomen they are situated ventrally to the tori, at the ventral edge of each segment. Dorsal lips with short and club-like radiolar appendages of dark yellowish colour. Pinnular appendages absent, ventral radiolar appendages absent, ventral lips developed and enlarged, extending dorsoventrally along inner surface of base of radiolar lobes and connecting ventrally to the radiolar lobes by a sheet of tissue; parallel lamellae and ventral sacs absent (). Pygidium antero-posteriorly flattened, with the ventral edge divided into different lobes, laterally elongated (). Crown holding 21 radioles on one radiolar lobe and 22 on the other. Pinnulae thin, between 1/3 and 1/4 of the radiole length, with rounded tip, disposed in pairs along the radiole; the longer pinnulae located in the distal half of the radiole, then to rapidly decrease in length to the starting point of the radiolar tip. Radioles showing purple rachis on the outer surface, connected by a lighter, semi-transparent palmate membrane that runs up to the start of the radiolar tip. Some radioles show, at the starting point of the radiolar tip, a dorsal thickening and an increase in the intensity of the purple rachis. The palmate membrane becomes slightly darker in colour, especially on the anterior edge and towards the radiolar tip. Here it follows the radiolar tip extending into radiolar flanges that become progressively thinner, enhancing the long and tapering appearance of the long radiolar tip, measuring >1/4 of the radiole length (). Radiolar skeleton composed of 2 cells surrounded by a hyaline matrix, bifurcated margin (). Despite the dark colouration of the radiolar tip, small eyespots are appreciable in some radioles, disposed on the sides, along the first half of the radiolar tip. Peristomial eyes not visible. Interramal eyes visible from the third thoracic chaetiger, generally in the form of a single eyespot, rarely as a pair with one larger. These shift into lateral eyes, as they move dorsally along the abdomen, increasing in number (up to 3–4 units each side) towards the pygidium and disposed in a more dispersed way. However, in the segments immediately anterior to the pygidium, they decrease both in number and in dispersion. Pygidial eyes present and dark, numerous and smaller in the middle of the pygidium while fewer and slightly larger on the sides, disposed according to the elongated shape of the same. Numerous narrowly hooded thoracic notochaetae with long tip, disposed circularly to form a tuft; in the first chaetiger the chaetae are similar to the other thoracic chaetae, but with a shorter and broader hood (), Thoracic uncini curved, with numerous smaller teeth above the first half of the main fang (). Abdominal uncini mostly with 2 long teeth above the main fang; generally, of the same size and extending to half of the length of the main fang, they can be found with one tooth larger in size with respect to the other. Rarely a single long tooth can be present flanked by a series of small teeth or just a large, apical tooth. Breast rounded, without handle, main fang slightly longer than the breast (). Abdominal neurochaetae narrowly hooded, similar to the first chaetiger thoracic notochaetae ().

Remarks

Of the 3 complete individuals, the smallest measured 4 cm in body length and 1.7 cm in crown length, the medium one 4.4 cm body length and 1.7 cm crown length, and the largest 6.65 cm body length and 2 cm crown length. Even though only 3 specimens are complete, the relationship between body and crown length is linear and significant (R2 = 0.98). Moreover, a significant relationship is maintained also if we utilize all 8 specimens collected, but correlating crown with thorax length, which was complete in all the analysed specimens (R2 = 0.81). The number of abdominal segments grows linearly with size, as the individuals show 93, 101 and 111 segments, respectively. Crown holding generally 25–26 pairs of radioles, the individuals with the smaller crown length (1.7 cm) show fewer radioles (21–22 pairs); the relationship between crown length and number of radioles, measured in all 8 specimens collected, seems to be significant (R2 = 0.63). Peristomium grows linearly with the length of the thorax (R2 = 0.88). No pattern is found in the relationship of either crown length or radiolar tip and maximum pinnulae length.

Myxicola giuliae differ from M. cosentini in having a less stocky and less flattened body shape, and an undivided triangular lobe. Although the radiolar tip seems to be longer in M. cosentini, the ratio between radiolar tip and radiolar length is higher in M. giuliae, as is as the crown/body length ratio. The shape of the triangular lobe and the morphology of the radiolar tip differentiate it also from the two English forms.

The long radiolar tip also differentiates this species from the other taxa here analysed as well as from M. sulcata, M. fauveli and M. violacea. The absence of macroscopic radiolar eyes and the number of thoracic segments separate it from M. ommatophora, M. nana and M. aesthetica.

Etymology

The species is named after Dr Giulia My, the girlfriend of one of the authors (MP).

Distribution and ecology

This taxon was first collected in the Marina di Brindisi (Brindisi), a small touristic port located in an enclosed area, characterized by a soft bottom, low hydrodynamics and high sedimentation rate. This environment typically hosts large sabellids, such as Acromegalomma lanigerum, Sabella spallanzanii (Gmelin, Citation1791) (which is abundant on the artificial substrata of the area) and representatives of the genus Branchiomma. A similar environment is present in the Mar Piccolo of Taranto, although it is characterized by a higher enclosure level and major freshwater input. This seems to be a good environment for Myxicola taxa. However, M giuliae sp. nov. has been found also in completely different environments, as in “Chiapparo” Bay at Santa Caterina di Nardò, a rocky coast characterized by greater depth (up to 25 m) and the prevalence of sandy substrata (Toso & Musco Citation2022), as well as within Halophila stipulacea (Toso & Musco, Citation2023) and Posidonia oceanica mattes at 17 m depth, in the area at integral protection of MPA of Torre Guaceto.

Myxicola cataldoi Putignano et al. Citation2023 sp. nov.

()

Figure 10. Myxicola cataldoi. (a) entire worm; (b, c) peristomial ring, ventral and lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) pygidium; (f) radiolar tip; (g) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bars: b, d, f = 1 mm; c = 2 mm; e = 0.5 mm.

Figure 10. Myxicola cataldoi. (a) entire worm; (b, c) peristomial ring, ventral and lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) pygidium; (f) radiolar tip; (g) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bars: b, d, f = 1 mm; c = 2 mm; e = 0.5 mm.

Figure 11. Myxicola cataldoi. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c). 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus; (e) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Figure 11. Myxicola cataldoi. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c). 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus; (e) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Holotype

Mar Piccolo of Taranto (Apulia, Italy) [40.491529°N, 17.265163°E], in September 2021 at 2 m depth. MNCN 16.01/19243.

Paratypes

6 specimens from the same locality and site. One individual was incomplete (lacking almost half of the body). Two other individuals were lacking the last setiger; PCZL S.M. 8.1; two individuals were fixed in 96° ethanol for DNA analysis.

Description

Holotype complete, with body dark purple anteriorly, shading into yellow–whitish colour towards the pygidium, cylindrical. Crown purple, darker than the body (). Body length 3.5 cm and crown length 1.3 cm; ratio between body and crown length of 2.7. Eight thoracic chaetigers and 108 abdominal ones. Glandular girdle close to the posterior edge of the second thoracic chaetiger. Thorax longer than wide. Peristomium 0.99 mm high, with an anteriorly developed fleshy triangular lobe that divides the crown into two halves ventrally. High ventrally and dorsally, it decreases abruptly laterally into the mid-lateral incision that appears to split the same into a ventral and a dorsal half; junction between body and crown not visible. Triangular lobe pointed and characterized by a ciliary epithelium that runs ventrally at least in the anterior peristomial ring. A thin, membranous collar is also observable, higher laterally, decreasing ventrally and dorsally, in an opposite trend with respect to the peristomium (). Dorsal lips with short, thin and tapering radiolar appendages whitish in colour. Pinnular appendages absent, ventral radiolar appendages absent, ventral lips well developed and high, of tubular shape, extending dorsoventrally along inner surface of base of radiolar lobes and connecting ventrally to the radiolar lobes by a sheet of tissue; parallel lamellae and ventral sacs absent (). Pygidium dorso-ventrally flat and triangular in shape (). Crown holding 17 pairs of radioles. Radioles showing purple rachis on the outer surface, connected by a yellowish palmate membrane that runs up to the start of the radiolar tip. Here the palmate membrane becomes progressively darker and purple in colour, almost like the rachis. The membrane extends into radiolar flanges of the radiolar tip, giving it a lanceolate shape; radiolar tip blunt, length 1/5 of the radiole length (). Interestingly, the purple layer of the rachis of the radioles appears to be more connected to the palmate membrane than to the radiole itself. Radiolar skeleton composed of 2 cells surrounded by a hyaline matrix (). Pinnulae thin, around ¼ of the radiole length, with rounded tip, disposed in an alternate pattern along the radiole; the longer pinnulae are located in the distal half of the radiole, then rapidly decrease in length to the starting point of the radiolar tip. A single pair of radiolar eyes is present in subdistal disposition on a number of radioles. Peristomial eyes not visible. Interramal eyes visible from the fourth thoracic chaetiger, generally in the form of a single eyespot, rarely a pair with one larger. These shift into lateral eyes, as they move dorsally along the abdomen, increasing in number towards the pygidium and disposed in a more dispersed way. This is particularly evident in the segments in front of the pygidium, where the eyespots are around all the chaetiger, totalling 6–7 units. Pygidial eyes are present, dark and numerous, more disposed laterally with a few dispersed around. Numerous broadly hooded thoracic notochaetae with long tip, disposed circularly to form a tuft; in the first chaetiger the chaetae are similar to the other thoracic chaetae, but with a shorter hood (). Thoracic uncini slightly curved, with at least a short tooth above the main fang, fairly adherent to the same (). Abdominal uncini in 2 forms: a single large tooth apically to the main fang, length at least half of the main fang, and a large tooth flanked by a smaller one, both disposed a little bit laterally with respect to the apex of the uncinus; breast rounded, without handle, main fang long as the breast (). Abdominal neurochaetae broadly hooded, almost identical to the thoracic notochaetae ().

Remarks

The size varies among individuals, from the smallest specimen of 2.7 cm body length and 1 cm crown length to 5.5 cm body length and 1.8 cm crown length in the largest, a mean value of 3.9 cm for the body and 1.5 cm for the crown. Ratio between body and crown length appears to remain constant (1/3), with a linear relationship between increasing body and crown length (R2 = 0.92). However, the number of abdominal segments seems not to grow linearly with size, as the smallest specimen shows 107 segments, the largest has 129 and the medium ones have 96 and 98 segments. Peristomium grows linearly with body size (R2 = 0.93), with a mean length of 1.55 mm; the same goes for thorax length (R2 = 0.96). Crown holding 21 pairs of radioles in most of the specimens, with the two smaller specimens holding 16 and 17 pairs, respectively, probably indicating an increase in number with size (R2 = 0.71). Interestingly, the statistical analysis showed that as the length of the crown increases, the length of the pinnulae (with respect to the length of their radiole) decreases (R2 = 0.95), while no significant trend was found for the length of the radiolar tip.

Differently from the previous two taxa, this species has a more similar morphology of the radiolar tip to the “black-tipped” English form, lanceolate and shorter. However, these two forms can be easily distinguished by the shape of both lips and radiolar appendages, higher and tubular with thin and tapering radiolar appendages. Further differences are related to the general body shape (stockier and more flattened dorso-ventrally), the triangular lobe shape (undivided), and the size and crown/body length ratio. The triangular lobe morphology clearly separates this form also from the “white-tipped” English form.

The peculiarities of the lips and the radiolar appendages, together with the unique morphology of the peristomial triangular lobe, clearly differentiate this species from the other taxa here analysed. The first feature differentiates this taxon also from M. sulcata, while the absence of macroscopic radiolar eyes and the number of thoracic segments separate it from M. ommatophora, M. nana and M. aesthetica. Finally, the structure of the radioles, both as radiolar skeleton and as radiolar tip, differentiates this species from M. fauveli and M. violacea.

Etymology

The species is named after Dr Cataldo Pierri, who collected the specimens.

Distribution and ecology

The specimens were collected in the Mar Piccolo di Taranto (Taranto), a unique environment, characterized by a progressive enclosure level. Here, low hydrodynamism, high sedimentation rate and freshwater input dominate the dynamics of this site.

Myxicola mikacae Putignano et al. Citation2023 sp. nov.

as M infundibulum in Mikac et al. Citation2012

()

Figure 12. Myxicola mikacae. (a) entire worm; (b–d) peristomial ring: (b) ventral, (c) dorsal and (d) lateral view; (e) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (f) photo of peristomial ring; (g) radiolar tip; (h) pygidium; (i) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bars: f = 2 mm; g = 1 mm; h = 0.5 mm.

Figure 12. Myxicola mikacae. (a) entire worm; (b–d) peristomial ring: (b) ventral, (c) dorsal and (d) lateral view; (e) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (f) photo of peristomial ring; (g) radiolar tip; (h) pygidium; (i) scheme of radiolar section. Scale bars: f = 2 mm; g = 1 mm; h = 0.5 mm.

Figure 13. Myxicola mikacae. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th setiger thoracic uncini; (e) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Figure 13. Myxicola mikacae. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta; (d) 4th setiger thoracic uncini; (e) 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Holotype

North Adriatic, Croatian coasts 2005, sandy bottom at 31 m depth, 17 nautical miles from Istrian Peninsula; Stations SJ 005 [45.306667°N, 13.3°E]. Fixed in formalin 4% and preserved in ethanol 70°; MNCN 16.01/19246.

Paratypes

3 specimens from the same locality, collected in 2003; PCZL S.M. 6.1, 6.2, 6.3.

Description

Holotype complete, with body fully whitish, cylindrical, and a slightly dorso-ventrally flattened abdomen. Crown white (). Eight thoracic and 74 abdominal chaetigers for 2.3 cm body length (3.5 mm thorax and 1.95 cm abdomen), max width 2.5 mm; crown length 1.45 cm. Ratio between crown and body length of 1.58; Thorax longer than wide. Peristomium 1.01 mm high, with a fleshy high triangular lobe markedly anteriorly developed, with a pointed shape, dividing the crown into two halves ventrally; it progressively decreases laterally, showing a mid-lateral incision that appears to split the same into a ventral and a dorsal half; junction between crown and body visible laterally through the lateral incision (). Glandular girdle close to the posterior edge of the second thoracic chaetiger. Dorsal lips with short and club-like radiolar appendages whitish in colour (). Pinnular appendages absent, ventral radiolar appendages absent, ventral lips developed, extending dorsoventrally along inner surface of base of radiolar lobes and connecting ventrally to the radiolar lobes by a sheet of tissue; parallel lamellae and ventral sacs absent. Crown holding 14 pairs of radioles. Radioles with the outer surface of the rachis clear in colour; connected by a lighter, semi-transparent low palmate membrane. The continuation of the palmate membrane as narrow radiolar flanges up to the radiolar tip give it a more flattened shape. Tip 1/6 of the radiolar length, with blunt end (). Thin and blunt pinnules, length up to 1/5 of the radiolar length, with a strictly alternating disposition along the radiole; the longer pinnulae are located in the distal half of the radiole, then progressively decrease in length to the starting point of the radiolar tip. Radiolar skeleton with one row of rounded and tightly piled skeletal cells surrounded by a hyaline matrix (). Radiolar eyes not visible. Peristomial eyes not visible. Lateral and interramal eyes not visible. Pygidial eyes not visible. Pygidium antero-posteriorly flattened, divided ventrally into two lobes (). Numerous broadly hooded thoracic notochaetae with long tapering tip, disposed circularly to form a tuft; in the first chaetiger the tapering tip is longer (almost double the hood length) (). Second to eighth thoracic chaetigers with markedly curved acicular uncini, showing a single, long and tapering tooth above the main fang, almost of the same length (). Abdominal uncini always showing more than one great tooth above the main fang, conformation a set of 3: two main teeth with a small tooth in the middle, two main teeth with a slightly smaller one in the middle and three main teeth of the same size; breast round, absence of handle, uncini as high as long, main fang shorter than the breast (). Abdominal neurochaetae broadly hooded, almost identical to the thoracic notochaetae ().

Remarks

This species appears completely different from the other taxa here analysed and from the typical appearance of M. infundibulum even at first glance. This is due mainly to the different ratio between crown and body length, with the former being particularly long. Also, the shape of the peristomium, extremely elongated ventrally into the triangular lobe, separates it from the other species, similarly to the “white-tipped” English form; however, the features of the pale crown, very long, with few radioles and with a short palmate membrane, differentiate this taxon as almost all accepted Myxicola species possess a high palmate membrane (the two English forms included), except for M. nana which is clearly distinguishable by the number of thoracic segments, and M. fauveli which differs in the unique structure of the radiolar tip. Another interesting character linked to the crown structure is the radiolar skeleton, which is composed of just 1 row of hyaline cells: this state is found also in M. violacea, which, however, has a high palmate membrane. Also, the absence of eyespots is a peculiarity of this species: in fact, even supposing that interramal and lateral eyes are not visible due to preservation bias, pygidial eyes at least should have been visible, while the absence of macroscopic radiolar eyes separates it from M. ommatophora. The species that most resembles this taxon is M. sulcata, especially in the biometry and in the shape of the triangular lobe, but the morphology of the thoracic uncini, which in M. mikacae sp. nov. have a long and tapering tooth, and the length of the palmate membrane allow us to differentiate between the two.

Etymology

The species is named after Dr Barbara Mikac who collected the material, in honour of her valuable contribution to the knowledge of the taxonomy and ecology of polychaetes, as well as for our esteem and friendship.

Distribution and ecology

The taxon was collected in the North Adriatic 17 nautical miles from the Croatia coast, on sandy substrata at 31 m depth.

Reestablishment of Myxicola pacifica Johnson, Citation1901

()

Figure 14. Myxicola pacifica. (a) entire worm; (b, c) peristomial ring, ventral and lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) radiolar tips; (f) scheme of radiolar section; (g) pygidium. Scale bars: b, c, e = 1 mm; g = 0.5 mm.

Figure 14. Myxicola pacifica. (a) entire worm; (b, c) peristomial ring, ventral and lateral view; (d) complex of ventral and dorsal lips; (e) radiolar tips; (f) scheme of radiolar section; (g) pygidium. Scale bars: b, c, e = 1 mm; g = 0.5 mm.

Figure 15. Myxicola pacifica. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta.; (d) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus of the original material: syntype MCZ ANNb-1879; (e) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus; (f) 24th abdominal uncinus of the original material: syntype MCZ ANNb-1879; G 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view; Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Figure 15. Myxicola pacifica. (a) 1st setiger thoracic chaeta; (b) 4th setiger thoracic chaeta; (c) 24th abdominal chaeta.; (d) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus of the original material: syntype MCZ ANNb-1879; (e) 4th setiger thoracic uncinus; (f) 24th abdominal uncinus of the original material: syntype MCZ ANNb-1879; G 24th abdominal uncini, lateral and front view; Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Material examined

1 individual collected from Friday Harbor (Washington, USA) [48°32ʹ37.9″N, 123°00′08.6″W] by AG in 1989, in the intertidal zone. Two syntypes from the MCZH (MCZ ANNb-1893 and MCZ ANNb-1879) and the above individual were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and preserved in 70% ethanol.

Analysis and drawings of the individual performed by AG in past years are used to integrate the present description.

Description

Individual from Friday Harbor. Body yellowish including crown, with lighter peristomium (). Individual measured 3.2 cm in body length with 1.15 cm crown length, for a ratio (between crown and body length) of 2.8. Eight thoracic chaetigers (in addition to the peristomium) and 82 abdominal segments. Glandular girdle close to the posterior edge of the second thoracic chaetiger. Thorax longer than wide. Peristomium 1.5 mm high, with an anteriorly developed fleshy triangular lobe of foliaceus appearance, that divides the crown into two halves ventrally (). High ventrally and dorsally, it decreases laterally, showing a mid-lateral incision that appears to split the same into a ventral and a dorsal half; junction between body and crown not visible (). Pygidium rounded and papilliform (). Crown holding 20 pairs of radioles. Dorsal lips with very short and papilliform radiolar appendages, pinnular appendages absent; ventral radiolar appendages absent, ventral lips developed, higher around the mouth and of triangular shape, extending dorsoventrally along inner surface of base of radiolar lobes and connecting ventrally to the radiolar lobes with a sheet of tissue; parallel lamellae and ventral sacs absent () Palmate membrane high, running up to the start of the radiolar tip. The membrane extends into radiolar flanges of the radiolar tip, covering the whole radiolar tip to its end and giving it a lanceolate shape (); radiolar tip rounded but not blunt, 1/5 of the radiole length. Pinnulae thin, between 1/3 and 1/4 of the radiole’s length, alternate along the radiole; the longer pinnulae are located at the distal half of the radiole, and decrease in length to the starting point of the radiolar tip. Radiolar eyes not visible. Radiolar skeleton composed of some sort of complex of more skeletal cells, where two seem to have a central role; however, it is probable that this kind of arrangement is a fixation artefact. For this reason, we consider this species to have 2 skeletal cells surrounded by a hyaline matrix (). Peristomial eyes not visible. Interramal eyes poorly visible, especially in the last abdominal chaetiger, as for the pygidial eyes. Numerous broadly hooded thoracic notochaetae with relatively short, tapering tip, disposed circularly to form a tuft; in the first chaetiger the chaetae are similar to the other thoracic chaetae, but with a shorter hood (). Second to eighth thoracic chaetigers with slightly curved acicular uncini, hosting three very short and stocky teeth above the main fang that are difficult to distinguish (). Abdominal uncini showing a main fang slightly shorter than the breast, with a long and thinner tooth apically to it. A shorter tooth is present on top of the larger one; small teeth can laterally flank the smaller tooth on both sides. Breast rounded, absence of handle (). Abdominal neurochaetae broadly hooded, with a shorter and narrower hood than the thoracic ones ().

Remarks

This species can be easily distinguished from most other valid Myxicola species thanks to the unique shape of its ventral triangular lobe (flattened and membranous), but also due to the peculiar shape of the thoracic uncini. The shape of the triangular lobe distinguishes it from both of the English forms reported by Darbyshire (Citation2019). Moreover, the shape and the colour of the radiolar tip clearly differentiate it from the English “black-tipped” form, together with the general body shape, which is more flattened and stockier, and of minor size. This feature differentiates this form from Montagu’s original description. Given this, we do not understand why this species was synonymized with M. infundibulum. Lastly, the absence of macroscopic radiolar eyes and the number of thoracic segments separate it from M. ommatophora, M. nana and M. aesthetica, while the structure of the radiolar tip and of the radiolar skeleton differentiate it from M. fauveli and M. violacea. The morphology of the thoracic uncini (together with the shape of the triangular lobe and of the radiolar tip) differentiates this taxon from M. sulcata.

Some characters are consistent between the original descriptions of M. pacifica Johnson, Citation1901 and our observations for the specimen collected by one of the authors (AG) from the type locality. In particular we refer to the number of abdominal segments (82 versus a maximum of 88), the length and shape of the radiolar tip, the ratio between body length and crown length (2.78 versus 2.85), and the morphology of both thoracic and abdominal uncini and of both thoracic and abdominal chaetae. By contrast, some other features described by Johnson were not found in our specimens: the presence of different chaetal types other than hooded ones in the thorax, as well as the number of radioles (20 pairs versus 14). However, the analysis of the two syntypes from the MCZH allowed us to dissipate these doubts, as the material proved identical to the specimen in our possession; the different typologies of chaetae were not found, leading us to think that they could be an artefact, therefore, we propose the restoration of the taxon M. pacifica (sensu Johnson, Citation1901).

Discussion

Myxicola infundibulum has been one of the first sabellid clearly distinguished from the group Sabella (sensu Linnaeus), thanks to its peculiar funnel-shaped and apparently uninterrupted crown. Unfortunately, the naturalists of the 19th century were so fascinated by this structure that no differences were noted between individuals collected in distant areas (Meneghini Citation1847). Only with the work of Meneghini were the first congeneric species described, with the expansion of the distribution of the genus to a global scale, between the last half of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th.

The description of several Myxicola taxa spans 1847 to 1928 with a final number of 20 taxa; there is then a gap of 87 years from the last species described in the past and the recent description of the last species (M. nana). The increase in species reported for the genus made clear that two major groups were present: one with a reduced thoracic chaetiger number (<6) and one with a standard number (8–9) (Augener Citation1918), which was revealed not to be size-dependent by a re-evaluation of old literature, with species belonging to the latter group showing a great variability in size (). In fact, what emerges in the accepted taxa (together with the ones described in the current work) is the recovery, inside the “infundibulum group”, of the same three groups based on the number of abdominal segments, found for the synonymized species (M. violacea with <70 segments; M. infundibulum sensu Montagu, M. cf. infundibulum, M. ommatophora, Myxicola sp. 2, M. cosentinii sp. nov., M. giuliae sp. nov. and M. cataldoi sp. nov. with >100 segments; and M. sulcata, M. mikachi, M. fauveli and M. pacifica with an intermediate number of segments).

Table II. Distribution of character in the up to now recognized species of Myxicola genus.

The synonymization of the majority of the past-described taxa with M. infundibulum is at the root of its cosmopolitan distribution. It started with Fauvel (Citation1927), who synonymized four of these species (M. sarsi, M. grubii, M. modesta and M. parasites) plus M. infundibulum both sensu Claparède () and sensu Lo Bianco (Citation1893), and continued with Hartman (Citation1948). The re-examination of the descriptions of synonymized taxa revealed that they share the same level of variability as the accepted ones, making it difficult to understand the criteria used in such discrimination. Explicative of this paradox is the invalidity of M. michaelseni as a taxon, even if it has the most complete description among the old species; and the validity of M. sarsi, which lacks both a complete description and an indication of the type locality. However, as already mentioned, a problem of misspelling is present concerning M. sarsi(i), deriving from the fact that in the same work (Kröyer Citation1856) reports M. sarsii as a synonym of M. infundibulum and M. sarsi as a valid species. In agreement with other authors (Capa & Murray Citation2015; Darbyshire Citation2019), we suggest the removal of M. sarsi from the list of valid Myxicola species and instead consider M sarsii as a probable good species.

Myxicola infundibulum has been reported for Mediterranean waters since its discovery by Renier (Citation1804), and specimens traditionally identified as belonging to this species are still reported along Italian coasts, mostly in enclosed environments characterized by a high sedimentation rate and high organic matter content. However, our morphological analysis shows important differences between the individuals collected along the Italian coast and those from the English waters, close to the type locality. Despite the poor state of preservation of our English material, called Myxicola sp. 1, divergences with Mediterranean material are conspicuous. This, together with the species reported by Darbyshire (Citation2019), from the type locality of M. infundibulum and others with a more northern distribution, led us to take into consideration that populations from the Mediterranean Sea and European Atlantic coasts represent different species, thus questioning the effective presence of M. infundibulum s.s. in the Mediterranean area. The same occurred in recent years for another pair of closely related sabellid species, namely Acromegalomma vesiculosum (Montagu, Citation1813) and Acromegalomma lanigerum (Grube, Citation1846) (Giangrande & Licciano Citation2008).

Among the Mediterranean material examined here, Myxicola sp. 2, from the Gulf of Naples, appeared the closest taxon to the English forms, even if it is clearly a different species from M. infundibulum. Unfortunately, the poor preservation of our material together with the impossibility to better analyse hard structures from the Eisig material deposited at the DaDoM at Stazione Zoologica in Naples, forces us, for the moment, to not describe it as a new taxon. Although the descriptions of Claparède (), Lo Bianco (Citation1893) and Iroso (Citation1921) were analysed, their comparison of some features was insufficient, and, as already mentioned, the description and the drawings of Fauvel (Citation1927) are quite unclear, as different shapes of peristomium are given, together with different morphology of thoracic uncini, leading us to suspect they represent a mixture of characters from different descriptions of material from several sites. Therefore, not only is a re-description of the M. infundibulum from the type locality needed, but also the collection of fresh material from the Gulf of Naples is urgently needed.

The availability of good material from other areas of the Italian coast revealed the presence of some taxa very similar to M. infundibulum, also sharing a similar habitat, but whose careful examination allowed the description of different species. One important feature emerging from the examination of this material was the presence of a pale body and a dark crown. They show an almost identical appearance, due to this shared colouration, dimensions and size. However, important differences can be found among them that justify the erection of three new taxa. They differ especially in the shape of the peristomial lobe. Peristomium in M. cataldoi sp. nov. is complex and unique, showing some sort of membranous collar starting from the sides of the triangular lobe to stop at the mid-lateral incision; moreover, what appears to be a ciliary epithelium runs ventrally along the first half of the peristomium, from the tip of the triangular lobe. This set of characters is unique to this taxon and has never been observed or reported in other Myxicola species.

A peculiar situation is found also in M. cosentini sp. nov., where the triangular lobe is clearly divided apically by a groove into two tips; a similar morphology is found in the “black-tipped” form from English waters, but the lobe is clearly shorter and somewhat backed inside between the two radiolar lobes.

Myxicola giuliae sp. nov. shows a more squared peristomium, with a flat triangular lobe characterized by two lateral notches and a rounded tip. Lastly, Myxicola sp. 2 from the Gulf of Naples shows a simple, rounded triangular lobe.

Myxicola cataldoi sp. nov. shares with Myxicola from the Gulf of Naples a relatively short radiolar tip with a rounded blunt end, flanked by narrow radiolar flanges for half of its length that gives it a lanceolate shape; by contrast M. giuliae sp. nov. and M. cosentinii sp. nov. possess a long and tapering tip, with a pointed end, and radiolar flanges that flank this structure for half of its length, progressively narrowing, enhancing the filiform appearance. However, M. giuliae sp. nov. and M. cosentinii sp. nov. differ in the radiolar tip not only in terms of its length, which is greater in the latter, even if the radiolar/tip length ratio is lower in the former, but also in the number of radiolar eyes present: some pairs along the first half of the radiolar tip for M. giuliae sp. nov. and an almost continuous row of eyes up to the tip for M. cosentinii sp. nov. Myxicola cataldoi sp. nov. shows just a pair of radiolar eyes in subdistal position of some radioles, while Myxicola from the Gulf of Naples seems to lack any kind of radiolar eyes. As concerns the disposition of pinnulae, M. cataldoi sp. nov. shows an alternate disposition along the radioles, as do M. cosentinii sp. nov. and Myxicola sp. 2, while M. giuliae sp. nov. shows clearly a paired disposition.

The skeletal section is a feature never considered before for this genus. The section of the radioles also shows some differences in the shape of the radiolar outer edge, being more rounded in M. cataldoi sp. nov. and in Myxicola sp. 2, and pointed in M. giuliae sp. nov. and M. cosentinii sp. nov. Moreover, in these last two species, a highly pigmented region is present just dorsal to the radiolar skeleton. All three new species show a purple rachis, whilst the material from the Gulf of Naples does not show any dark rachis. Lastly, lips from M. cataldoi sp. nov. are the only ones, among the taxa analysed in this work, to show a tubular shape, with thin dorsal radiolar appendages with pointed ends. Radiolar appendages of M. giuliae sp. nov. and M. cosentinii sp. nov. are similar, having a club-like shape. However, the first species has longer and more rounded lips, so the radiolar appendages appear relatively longer in M. cosentinii. In the material from the Gulf of Naples, radiolar appendages are more similar to the English forms (Myxicola sp. 1), with a more dorso-ventrally flattened appearance and a triangular shape, with a thinning but not tapering tip.

Thoracic uncini have a similar morphology, but the number of teeth above the main fang and their dimensions change among the species, with M. cataldoi sp. nov. showing 2–3 teeth the length of half of the main fang, M. giuliae sp. nov. a set of small teeth not reaching half of the main fang, M. cosentinii sp. nov. with 1–2 large teeth arriving around half of the length of the main fang, and no teeth present in the material from the Gulf of Naples. Abdominal uncini, which was a feature considered very distinctive by Dane (Citation2008), show differences in the general shape, with M. cosentinii sp. nov. showing a main fang longer than the breast, which is also more squared; M. cataldoi sp. nov. and M. giuliae sp. nov. having uncini with a main fang long as the breast; and Myxicola sp. 2 showing a breast rounded and longer than the main fang. Although a not-constant arrangement of smaller teeth above the main fang was observed also in the same specimen, some differences can be found in their disposition, with M. cataldoi sp. nov., M. giuliae sp. nov. and Myxicola sp. 2 showing few larger teeth, while M. cosentinii sp. nov. has smaller and numerous teeth.

The last clear difference between three of the four new described taxa is in the shape of the pygidium and the number of pygidial eyes: M. cataldoi sp. nov. shows a triangular dorso-ventrally flattened pygidium, with dark and numerous pygidial eyes, mostly disposed laterally along the posterior margin of the pygidium, with few dispersed on it; M. giuliae sp. nov. has a pygidium antero-posteriorly flattened and laterally elongated, with the ventral edge divided into different lobes, with numerous and smaller eyes in the middle of the pygidium and fewer and slightly larger eyes on the sides; M. cosentinii sp. nov. and Myxicola sp. 2 show both an antero-posteriorly flattened pygidium, with a disc-like shape, with pygidial eyes not clearly appreciable, or almost absent.

As mentioned, all of these taxa occupy a similar habitat, characterized by muddy substrata in areas with high sedimentation rate and low hydrodynamism. However, a different ecology is found for M. giuliae sp. nov. and M. mikacae sp. nov. Most of the available information concerns the former, which was reported also from sites characterized by conspicuous hydrodynamism, on at least three different substrata (mud, sand and gravel) and from a wider depth range, making this taxon the more diffused along the Salento coast, although the species shows a higher density between 3 and 6 m depth. The association of this taxon with marine phanerogams needs to be more investigated: the presence of M. giuliae sp. nov. specimens on sandy substrata with Halophila and Posidonia would not be surprising, as the presence of sabellids could be promoted by the increased sedimentation rate in this habitat (Deudero et al. Citation2011). Less information is available for M. mikacae sp. nov. which has been collected on offshore sandy substrata at 31 m depth. This makes M. mikacae sp. nov. the deepest Myxicola species in the Mediterranean Sea and the second deepest species in the world, after the Antarctic species M. sulcata. Myxicola mikacae also shows a previously unseen set of characters, such as the radiolar skeleton composed of just one cell row and the morphology of the thoracic and abdominal uncini. The peristomial lobe shape and the long crown with low palmate membrane are also very characteristic ( summaries the main morphological characters of the described taxa).

Figure 16. Comparative table of the main morphological characters of the Myxicola species studied.

Figure 16. Comparative table of the main morphological characters of the Myxicola species studied.

In light of the literature review, M. grubii could be another different Mediterranean taxon, although a good number of its features seem to resemble characteristics found in the new Mediterranean taxa (i.e. colour of the crown, shape of radiolar appendages and number of radioles). All the new described species show an almost double total number of segments at similar size respect to M. grubii. Among the new taxa presently described, the only ones showing a relatively short radiolar tip as in M. grubii are M. cataldoi sp. nov. and M. mikacae sp. nov. However, M. cataldoi sp. nov. can be easily recognized on the basis of the shape of radiolar appendages, while M. mikacae sp. nov shows a considerably higher number of segments (although they are smaller in size) and a longer crown. More material is needed from the North Adriatic Sea to ascertain the identity of M. grubii and its possible correspondence with Myxicola infundibulum sensu Renier (Citation1804).

As concerns extra-Mediterranean material, the restoration of the old species from Johnson Citation1901, M. pacifica, is here proposed. This taxon shows important differences with respect to both the Mediterranean and English taxa, especially in the morphology of thoracic and abdominal uncini, but also in the shape of the ventral triangular lobe. The individuals analysed, coming from the same type locality as the species described by Johnson (Citation1901), showed some inconsistencies with the original description; however, the analysis of syntypes from the MCZH showed they belong to the same species as our material.

Following this, we can be reasonably confident that most of the taxa synonymized with M. infundibulum represent valid species, especially the ones located in North America. Here, a taxon genetically and (partially) morphologically differentiated from M. infundibulum by Dane (Citation2008) has already been found and collected near the type locality of M. steenstrupi. It is therefore possible that the taxon examined by Dane is really this species.

Conclusions

Polychaeta account for more than 9000 species, distributed worldwide (Rouse & Pleijel Citation2001). They are an important component of marine animals, representing up to two-thirds of the macrofauna compartment (Grassle & Maciolek, Citation1992). However, a high percentage of the specimens present in samples belong to undescribed taxa, while several thousands are considered invalid (Rouse & Pleijel Citation2001). This is mainly due to old works in which there is vast synonymization in almost all the families. Despite being outdated, the influence of these works on the scientific community was so strong that they are still used today. A relevant problem arises from this situation, as the establishment of new taxa must not disregard the re-evaluation of old, synonymized species. Conversely, the risk of increasing confusion and misjudgements will be high (Martin et al. Citation2022; Teixeira et al. Citation2022). With this background, our work can represent an example where, properly taking into account the history of the studied group, a description of new taxa and the retrieval of invalid ones are paired. In fact, Myxicola Koch in Renier, Citation1847 is the second genus erected in the Sabellidae family, making it a collection of uncertainties and unclarities whose roots must be traced to the early life of this taxon, listening for echoes from a science 200 years old.

The present work is only the first part of a critically necessary revision of the genus Myxicola, where the current cosmopolitan status of M. infundibulum appears to be the outcome of outdated knowledge and synonymizations, and its real occurrence in the Mediterranean Sea must still be assessed. It is clear that resolving the complex situation around this genus requires knowledge of the history behind it. This is true especially for older taxa, which are affected by scientific contests different from those of our day.

In our examination of old literature, the work of Giuseppe Meneghini proved to be of central importance, providing us also information from authors working in extra-Mediterranean waters and reconstructing the first 50 years of life of this taxon, probably responsible for its actual cosmopolitan status, and for which no type material is available. However, thanks to recent observations conducted on British species we were able to partially bypass this problem and to erect new taxa for the Mediterranean Sea.

Our work leads to an increase in the number of Myxicola species from eight to 12, a number destined to grow further in the next few years. We believe, in fact, that under M. infundibulum lies a complex of species – not cryptic but merely overlooked – as a wider diversity and morphological variability were already detected almost two centuries ago.

We cannot help but wonder how many taxonomic groups, inside and outside the polychaetes, are affected by similar situations. The advent of molecular and advanced morphological taxonomic tools has taken our zoological and evolutionary knowledge far, but we cannot safely advance farther without the resolution of unclear cruxes in past taxonomy.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Dr Teresa Darbyshire, for her willingness to share her precious information and advice, which proved essential for the correct interpretation of the obtained results. We thank Dr Joachim Langeneck, Dr Daniele Arduini, Dr Jacopo Borghese and Dr Claudio Calabrese, for their useful interaction. Moreover, we thank the Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, the MCZH and DaDorhn Museum, in the person of Dr. Carlo Urbani, Dr. Adam J. Baldinger and Dr. Elisa Cenci, respectively. Lastly, we thank Luciano Guerrieri and Raffaele Putignano for the translation from Latin and old French of the historical literature.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • Augener H. 1918. Polychaeta. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas. Herausgegeben Hamburg: von W. Michaelsen. Z.L. Friederichsen & Co.
  • Bellan G. 1978. Une petite collection d’annelides polychetes recoltées dans l’Ile de São Miguel (Archipel des Açores). Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Ciências Naturais, Lisboa 18:57–67.
  • Bick A. 2007. Die Bedeutung postlarvaler ontogenetischer Merkmalsvariationen für die Taxonomie der Spionidae und Sabellidae. Diss: Doctoral Dissertion, Universitat Rostock.
  • Boyd MJ, Mulligan TJ, Shaughnessy FJ. 2002. Non-indigenous marine species of Humboldt Bay, California. California, USA: California Department of Fish and Game.
  • Bush KJ. 1905. Tubicolous annelids of the tribes Sabellides and Serpulides from the Pacific Ocean. New York: Doubleday, Page.
  • Campbell AC. 1976. The Hamlyn Guide to the seashore and shallow seas of Britain and Europe. London: Hamlyn.
  • Capa M, Giangrande A, Nogueira JMM, Tovar-Hernández MA. 2014. Sabellidae Latreille, 1825. In: Purschke G, Westheide W, editors. The Handbook of Zoology Online. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 42.
  • Capa M, Hutchings P, Aguado MT, Bott NJ. 2011. Phylogeny of Sabellidae (Annelida) and relationships with other taxa inferred from morphology and multiple genes. Cladistics 27:449–469.
  • Capa M, Murray A. 2015. A taxonomic guide to the fanworms (Sabellidae, Annelida) of Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia, including new species and new records. Zootaxa 4019:98–167.
  • Capa M, Nogueira JMDM, Rossi MCS. 2011. Comparative internal structure of dorsal lips and radiolar appendages in Sabellidae (Polychaeta) and phylogenetic implications. Journal of Morphology 272(3): 302–319.
  • Chamberlin RV. 1919. New polychaetous annelids from Laguna Beach, California. Journal of Entomology and Zoology of Pomona College 11:1–23.
  • Claparède É. 1870. Les Annélides Chétopodes du Golfe de Naples. Supplément. Mémoires de la Société de physique et d’histoire naturelle de Genève 20:365–542.
  • Cosentino A, Giacobbe S, Potoschi A. 2009. The CSI of Faro coastal lake (Messina): A natural observatory for the incoming of marine alien species. Biologia Marina Mediterranea 16:132–133.
  • Costa-Paiva EM, Paiva PC, Klautau M. 2007. Anaesthetization and fixation effects on the morphology of sabellid polychaetes (Annelida: Polychaeta: Sabellidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87:1127–1132.
  • Cuvier G. 1829-1830. Règne animal. 3rd ed, Vol. II. Paris: Chez Déterville. p. 118.
  • Dane L 2008. Morphological and genetic variation in the cryptic species complex Myxicola infundibulum (Polychaeta, Sabellidae), and its introduction to Australia. BSC (Hons) Thesis, University of Melbourne.
  • Darbyshire T 2019. Myxicola infundibulum (Montagu, 1808) in the UK – More than one species? Abstracts 13th International Polychaete Conference Long Beach, 4–9 August 2019, California.
  • Day JH. 1961. The polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part 6. Sedentary species dredged off Cape coasts with a few new records from the shore. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 44:463–560.
  • Delle Chiaje S. 1829. Memorie sulla storia et anatomia degli animali senza vertebre del regno di Napoli. Fratelli Fernandes/Societa Tipographica, Napoli. Memoria IV:204.
  • Delle Chiaje S. 1841. Descrizione e anatomia degli animali invertebrati della Sicilia citeriore osservati vivi negli anni 1822-1830. Batteli & Co., Naples. Vol. III–V, pp. 72–95; Tav. 106, figs. 5, 17.
  • Deudero S, Boxa A, Alósc J, Arroyod NL, Marbàc N. 2011. Functional changes due to invasive species: Food web shifts at shallow Posidonia oceanica seagrass beds colonized by the alien macroalga Caulerpa racemosa. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 93(2):106–116.
  • Edgar GJ. 2008. Australian Marine Life. 2nd ed. Sydney: New Holland.
  • Ehlers E. 1912. Polychaeta. National Antarctic Expedition, Natural History, Zoology 6:1–32.
  • Fauvel P. 1927. Faune de France 16: Polychètes sédentaires. Paris: Lechevalier. pp. 494.
  • Fitzhugh K. 1989. A systematic revision of the Sabellidae-Caobangiidae-Sabellongidae complex (Annelida, Polychaeta). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 192:104.
  • Fitzhugh K. 2003. A new species of Megalomma Johansson, 1927 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae: Sabellinae) from Taiwan, with comments on sabellid dorsal lip classification. Zoological Studies-Taipei 42:106–134.
  • Forbes. 1841. On two remarkable marine Invertebrata inhabiting the Aegean Sea. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 1841: XXX.
  • Gambi MC, Giangrande A, Colognola R. 1982. Policheti e archianellidi del Museo della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli. Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell’Università di Genova 50(suppl.):385.
  • Giangrande A, Cosentino A, Lo Presti C, Licciano M. 2012. Sabellidae (Annelida) from the Faro coastal lake (Messina, Ionian Sea), with the first record of the invasive species Branchiomma bairdi along the Italian coast. Mediterranean Marine Science 13:283–293.
  • Giangrande A, Licciano M. 2004. Factors influencing latitudinal pattern of biodiversity: An example using Sabellidae (Annelida, Polychaeta). Biodiversity & Conservation 13:1633–1646.
  • Giangrande A, Licciano M. 2008. Revision of the species of Megalomma (Polychaeta, Sabellidae) from the Mediterranean Sea, with the description of M. messapicum n. sp. Italian Journal of Zoology 75:207–217.
  • Giangrande A, Licciano M, Lezzi M, Caruso LPG, Musco L, Miglietta AM. 2015. La collezione degli Anellidi Policheti del Museo di Biologia Marina “Pietro Parenzan”, Università del Salento. Museologia Scientifica n.s 9:52–56.
  • Giangrande A, Putignano M, Licciano M, Gambi MC. 2021. The Pandora’s box: Morphological diversity within the genus Amphiglena Claparède, 1864 (Sabellidae, Annelida) in the Mediterranean Sea, with description of nine new species. Zootaxa 4949:zootaxa–4949.
  • Gmelin JF. 1791. Caroli Linnaei systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Ed. 13, aucta, reformata, Vermes Testacea. Lipsiae 1:3021–3910.
  • Goldman L, Chandler RE. 1986. Geographical distribution and inactivation kinetics in internally perfused Myxicola giant axons. Biophysical Journal 49:761–766.
  • Grassle JF, Maciolek NJ. 1992. Deep-sea species richness: Regional and local diversity estimates from quantitative bottom samples. The American Naturalist 139:313–341.
  • Grube AE. 1846. Beschreibung neuer oder wenig bekannter Anneliden. Beitrag: Canephorus, Ammochares, Dasymallus, Scalis-Arten. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Berlin 12:161–171.
  • Grube AE. 1855. Beschreibungen neuer oder wenig bekannter Anneliden. Vol. 21. Berlin: Archiv für Naturgeschichte. p. 123.
  • Grube AE 1878. Annulata Semperiana: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Annelidenfauna der Philippinen nach den von Prof. Semper mitgebrachten Sammlungen. Mémoires de l’Académie impériale de Saint-Pétersbourg, 7e série, t. XXV.
  • Hartman O. 1948. The polychaetous annelids of Alaska. Pacific Science 2:3–58.
  • Hartman O. 1968. Atlas of the errantiate polychaetous annelids from California. University South Carolina: Allan Hancock Fnd.
  • Hartmann-Schröder G. 1996. Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta. In: Dahl F, Schumann H, editors. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile nach ihren Merkmalen und nach ihrer Lebensweise. 2nd ed. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Teil 58.
  • Hayward PJ, Ryland JS. 1990. Marine fauna of the British Isles and North-West Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hayward PJ, Ryland JS. 1995. The British species of Schizoporella (Bryozoa: Cheilostomatida). Journal of Zoology 237:37–47.
  • Hobson KD, Banse K. 1981. Sedentariate and archiannelid polychaetes of British Columbia Canada and Washington USA. Canadian Bulletin of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 209:VII–144.
  • Høisæter T. 1989. Biological notes on some Pyramidellidae (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) from Norway. Sarsia 74:283–297.
  • Huang Z. 2001. Marine species and their distribution in China’s seas. Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.
  • Hutchings P, Glasby C. 2004. Port surveys for introduced marine species–and the fate of the material collected. Marine Pollution Bulletin 11:1009–1011.
  • Imajima M. 1968. Polychaetous annelids from Hayama, Miura Peninsula. Science Report of the Yokosuka City Museum 14:20–41.
  • Iroso I. 1921. Revisione dei Serpulidi e Sabellidi del Golfo di Napoli. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli 3:47–91.
  • Johnson HP 1901. The polychaeta of the Puget Sound region. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, Boston 29:381–437.
  • Kröyer H. 1856. Afhandling om Ormeslaegten Sabella Linn., isaer med Hensyn til dens nordiske Arter [Alternate title: Bidrag til Kundskab af Sabellerne]. Oversigt over det Kongelige danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger 1856:1–36.
  • Lamarck JB. 1838. Anim. s. verteb. 2nd ed, Vol. V. Paris: Baillière JB, Libraire. p. 611.
  • Langerhans P. 1884. Die Wurmfauna von Madeira, IV. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 40:247–285.
  • Langton RW, Robinson WE. 1990. Faunal associations on scallop grounds in the western Gulf of Maine. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 144:157–171.
  • Lo Bianco S. 1893. Gli Anellidi Tubicoli trovati nel Golfo di Napoli. Atti della Reale Accademia delle scienze fisiche e matematiche, ser 2(5):1–97.
  • Marenzeller EV. 1885. Südjapanische Anneliden. II. Ampharetea, Terebellacea, Sabellacea, Serpulacea. Denkschrift der Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien (mathematische und naturwissenschaften Klasse) 49:197–224.
  • Martin D, Estefa J, Gil J. 2022. Taxonomic review of Gallardoneris nonatoi (Ramos, 1976) comb. nov. (Annelida, Lumbrineridae), and description of a new species of Lumbrineris from the Gulf of Mexico. ZooKeys 1114:35–57.
  • McIntosh WC. 1922. A Monograph of the British Annelids. London: Ray Society.
  • Mclntosh WC. 1923. A monograph of the British marine annelids. Polychaeta, Sabellidae to Serpulidae. With additions to the British marine Polychaeta during the publication of the monograph. Royal Society of London 4:251–538.
  • Meneghini G. 1847. Osservazioni postume di Zoologia Adriatica del Professore Stefano Andrea Renier, della Terebella infundibulum o Tuba divisa. Venezia: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti.
  • Mikac B, Giangrande A, Licciano M. 2013. Sabellidae and Fabriciidae (Polychaeta) of the Adriatic Sea with particular retrospect to the Northern Adriatic and the description of two new species. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93:1511–1524.
  • Montagu G. 1808. Description of several marine animals found on the south coast of Devonshire. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 9:81–114.
  • Montagu G. 1813. I. Descriptions of several new or rare Animals, principally marine, discovered on the South Coast of Devonshire. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 11:1–26.
  • Muir AI, Petersen ME. 2013. Authorship of some polychaete (Annelida) names derived from the works of Renier and Savigny. Zootaxa 3717:383–388.
  • Nicol JAC. 1948. The giant axons of annelids. The Quarterly Review of Biology 23:291–323.
  • Nicol JAC, Young JZ. 1946. Giant nerve fibre of Myxicola infundibulum (Grube). Nature 158:167–168.
  • Potts FA. 1928. Zoological results of the Cambridge expedition to the Suez Canal. Report on the annelids (sedentary polychaetes). Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 22:693–705.
  • Quatrefages AD. 1866. Histoire naturelle des annelés marins et d’eau douce. Annélides et géphyriens. Vol. 2. Paris: Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret.
  • Read G. 2015. Myxicola Koch in Renier, 1847. In: Read G, Fauchald K, editors. World Polychaeta database. World Register of Marine Species. Available: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129537. Accessed Aug 2022 20.
  • Renier SA. 1804. Prospetto della classe dei Vermi Nominate e Ordinati secondo il Sistema di Bosc. Padova.
  • Renier SA. 1807a. Tavola alfabetica delle Conchiglie Adriatiche. Nominate dictro il Sistemo di Linneo. Edizione di Gmelin.
  • Renier SA. 1807b. Tavole per servire alla classificazione e conoscenza degli animali. Tipografia del Seminario.
  • Renier SA. 1847. [posthumously as edited by Meneghini, Giuseppe]. Osservazioni postume di Zoologia Adriatica del Professore Stefano Andrea Renier, membro effettivo dell’Istituto Italiano, pubblicate per cura dell’I. R. Istituto Veneto de Scienze, Lettere ed Arti a studio del membro effettivo Prof. G. Meneghini. Venezia: Giovanni Cecchini.
  • Roberts MBV. 1962. The rapid response of Myxicola infundibulum (Grübe. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 42:527–539.
  • Rouse G, Pleijel F. 2001. Polychaetes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Saint-Joseph AAD. 1894. Les Annélides polychètes des côtes de Dinard. Troisième Partie. Annales des sciences naturelles. Paris 17:1-395, plates I–XIII.
  • Simboura N, Nicolaidou A. 2001. The Polychaetes (Annelida, Polychaeta) of Greece: Checklisht, distribution and ecological characteristics. Greece: Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR).
  • Smith RI, Carlton JT. 1975. Light’s Manual: Intertidal invertebrates of the central California coast. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Teixeira M, Langeneck J, Vieira P, Hernández JC, Sampieri B, Kasapidis P, Mucciolo S, Bekken T, Ravara A, Nygren A, Costa F. 2022. Reappraisal of the hyperdiverse Platynereis dumerilii (Annelida: Nereididae) species complex in the North Atlantic, with the description of two new species. Invertebrate Systematics 36:1017–1061.
  • Tilic E, Sayyari E, Stiller J, Mirarab S, Rouse GW. 2020. More is needed—Thousands of loci are required to elucidate the relationships of the ‘flowers of the sea’ (Sabellida, Annelida. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 151:106892.
  • Toso A, Furfaro G, Fai S, Giangrande A, Piraino S. 2022. “A sea of fireworms? New insights on ecology and seasonal density of Hermodice carunculata (Pallas, 1766) (Annelida) in the Ionian Sea (SE Italy). The European Zoological Journal 89(1):1104–1114.
  • Toso A, Musco L. 2023. The hidden invasion of the alien seagrass Halophila stipulacea (Forsskål) Ascherson along Southeastern Italy. Vol. 24. Mediterranean Marine Science. pp. 96–100.
  • Tovar-Hernández MA, De León-González JÁ, Bybee DR. 2017. Sabellid worms from the Patagonian shelf and Humboldt current system (Annelida, Sabellidae): Phyllis Knight-Jones’ and José María Orensanz’s collections. Zootaxa 4283:1–64.
  • Uschakov B. 1955. Polychaetes of the Far Eastern Seas of the USSR. Academy of Sciences of the USSR Zoological Institute 56:1–419.
  • Wirtz P. 1995. Unterwasserführer Madeira Kanaren Azoren Niedere Tiere - Underwater Guide Madeira Canary Islands Invertebrates. Stuttgart: Delius Klasing.