2,687
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study

, , &
Pages 159-166 | Received 22 Jun 2020, Accepted 13 Oct 2020, Published online: 03 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

Aim

Resin composite (RC) are commonly used under full crowns. However, independent information is lacking to guide practitioners regarding core RC material selection. This study aimed at comparing the flexural properties of a large selection of commercially-available core build-up RCs (CBU-RC), either light-, self- or dual-cure, to conventional light-cure RCs.

Methods

RCs were injected into a 25 × 2×2mm Teflon mold, and either light-cured during 20 s (materials with claimed light-cure characteristics) or covered by aluminum during 10 min (dual- and self-cure CBU-RCs). They were subjected after a one-week water storage at 37.5 °C to three-point bending, and Flexural modulus (Eflex) and Flexural Strength (σf) were calculated (n = 20). Thermogravimetric analysis (n = 3) was performed to determine inorganic filler content (%).

Results

For dual-cure CBU-RCs, both RC (p < .0001) and light-curing (p = .0007) had a significant influence on Eflex, while only RC was significant for σf (p < .0001). Between all conventional RCs and CBU-RCs, significant differences were observed (p < .0001), both regarding Eflex and σf, with values ranging from 3.9 to 15.5 GPa and from 76 to 130.3 MPa, respectively. Higher Eflex values were observed for light-cure RCs than for self- and dual-cure ones, while no clear trend was noticed regarding σf. Good linear correlation was found between inorganic filler content and Eflex (R2=0.85, p < .0001), but not with σf (R2=0.08, p = .1609).

Conclusion

This work demonstrated a positive influence of light-curing on dual-cure CBU-RC’s Eflex. It also highlighted large differences in flexural properties (especially Eflex) among the investigated materials, questioning the use of some CBU-RCs as dentin replacement in case of large tissue loss.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the manufacturers for supporting this study by supplying the investigated materials: 3M ESPE, Dentsply, DMG, GC, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Kuraray, Septodont, Ultradent and VOCO.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

VOCO covered some of the operating costs of the study.