1,591
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Atmosphere

Urgent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions is needed to avoid irreversible tipping points: time is running out

ORCID Icon
Pages 38-45 | Received 26 Dec 2022, Accepted 03 Feb 2023, Published online: 10 Feb 2023

ABSTRACT

This essay addresses climate change and its main causes over the last three decades. Between 1992–2021, global emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) have risen continually. Specifically, the major socioeconomic sectors – including (1) energy, (2) industry, (3) land-use/land-use change/agriculture, (4) transportation, (5) building/construction, and (6) waste treatment/disposal – have emitted enormous amounts of GHGs. Between 1992–2019, the combined annual GHG emissions have risen by 53% – from 32.6 to 49.8 Gt CO2 equivalent (CO2e). The combined GHG concentration has increased by 33% – from 382 ppm CO2e in 1992 to 508 ppm CO2e in 2021. The combined radiative forcing has surged by 45% – from 2.226 W m−2 in 1992 to 3.222 W m−2 in 2021. At the current emission rate, the entire GHG credit for limiting global warming to 1.5°C or 2.0°C – according to the Shared Socio-Economic Pathway (SSP) 1–1.9 or SSP1–2.6, respectively – in 2100 compared to preindustrial levels may be fully exploited by~2030. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C or 2.0°C will require total GHG emissions to peak before 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by 43% or 25%, respectively, in 2030 relative to 2019, followed by zero net emissions in the early 2050s or 2070s, respectively.

1. Introduction

Over recent decades, global climate change has become evident, manifested by rising temperatures, increasing severity and duration of droughts over extensive parts of the world (Naumann et al., Citation2018), and higher frequency and magnitude of intense rainstorms causing devastating floods (Liao et al., Citation2019). The establishment of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992 and the concurrent UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro primarily aimed at formulating the intergovernmental basis for collaborative efforts in climate change mitigation and adaptation (Seo, Citation2017). The subsequent establishment of the Conference of Parties (COP) mechanism was particularly aimed at implementing the UNFCCC policy, while serving as the worldwide executive authority for climate-related decision making (Wamsler et al., Citation2020). Between 1995–2021, world leaders met at numerous COP annual meetings to coordinate the intergovernmental climate change-related actions (Stavi, Citation2022). Following COP21, held in Paris in 2015, the Paris Agreement was published, highlighting the need to limit global warming compared to preindustrial levels (the 1850–1900 baseline). Specifically, to negate irreversible climate tipping points that may trigger a cascading series of events with severe consequences and sometimes unexpected climatic feedbacks (Wunderling et al., Citation2021), the maximum temperature increase by 2100 was set to 1.5°C or 2.0°C at the most (IPCC, Citation2019). Despite these intergovernmental efforts, over the past three decades (1992–2021), global temperature anomaly relative both the 1901–2000 and 1951–1980 baselines has increased substantially ().

Figure 1. Changes between 1992–2019 in: global temperature anomalies relative to the 1901–2000 and 1951–1980 base periods (a); total greenhouse gases (GHGs, in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)) emission (b); and CO2e concentration (c).

Figure 1. Changes between 1992–2019 in: global temperature anomalies relative to the 1901–2000 and 1951–1980 base periods (a); total greenhouse gases (GHGs, in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)) emission (b); and CO2e concentration (c).

Over the same period, annual emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) have risen by 53% – from 32.6 Gt carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) in 1992 to 49.8 Gt CO2e in 2019 (). Concordantly, the combined CO2e atmospheric concentration of total GHGs rose by 33% – from 382 ppm in 1992 to 508 ppm in 2021 (). Among the GHGs, atmospheric concentrations of the major ones, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) have risen over this period by 17% (), 10% (), and 8% (), respectively (https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/atmospheric-concentration-of-carbon-dioxide-5#tab-chart_5_filters=%7B%22rowFilters%22%3A%7B%7D%3B%22columnFilters%22%3A%7B%22pre_config_polutant%22%3A%5B%22N2O%20ppb%22%5D%7D%7D). Further, the rate of increase in atmospheric GHG concentrations has accelerated over time. For example, the mean growth rate of CO2 was 1.5 ppm y−1 between 1991–2000, 1.9 ppm y−1 between 2001–2010, and 2.4 ppm y−1 between 2011–2020 (https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/gl_gr.html). Regardless, over a 100-y period, the global warming potential (GWP) of CH4, N2O, and halogenated compounds is 27–30, 273, and thousands to tens-of-thousands times greater, respectively, than that of CO2 (https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials).

Over the past three decades, the radiative forcing (the atmospheric heating effect) of CO2, CH4, N2O, and halogenated compounds has increased by 62% (from 1.325 to 2.140 W m−2), 13% (from 0.467 to 0.526 W m−2), 58% (from 0.133 to 0.210 W m−2), and 16% (from 0.300 to 0.348 W m−2), respectively, yielding a combined increase (by all GHGs together) of 45% (from 2.226 to 3.222 W m−2) (). The Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI) – formulated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – was introduced in 2006 and since then is updated annually. It calculates the ratio between total radiative forcing due to these gases in a given year and the total radiative forcing in 1990. Between 1992–2021, the AGGI rose by 45% (from 1.028 to 1.488) relative to the 1990 baseline (https://gml.noaa.gov/aggi/aggi.html: ).

Figure 3. Changes in radiative forcing (a), and annual greenhouse gas index (AGGI) relative to the 1990 baseline (b), between 1992–2021.

Figure 3. Changes in radiative forcing (a), and annual greenhouse gas index (AGGI) relative to the 1990 baseline (b), between 1992–2021.

The introduced Shared Socio-Economic Pathway (SSP) (also known as the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP)) scheme defines the boundaries for radiative forcing in order to negate climate tipping points (Shukla et al., Citation2019). The main global tipping points that have been identified are polar ice sheet collapse, sea level rise, permafrost thawing, disruption of major weather systems, forest die-off, and ocean acidification (WMO, Citation2022). According to this scheme, limiting global temperature increase to 1.5°C or 2.0°C would necessitate restricting the end-of-century radiative forcing to 1.9 W m−2 (SSP1–1.9 or RCP1.9: ‘Taking-the-green-road-1st’) or 2.6 W m−2 (SSP1–2.6 or RCP2.6: ‘Taking-the-green-road-2nd’), respectively (Shukla et al., Citation2019). However, as shown in this essay, current emission rates show little if any chance of achieving this ambitious goal. In the following section, trends of emissions by the major socioeconomic sectors are concisely discussed. The essay’s final section encompasses a call for intergovernmental administrations, as well as decision makers at all levels, to urgently implement effective policymaking in climate change mitigation, while emphasising that only decisive and proactive climate governance can negate irreversible climate tipping points.

2. Major GHG emitting sectors

2.1. The energy sector

Over the last three decades, global GHG emissions from fossil fuel use in the energy sector – including electricity and heat production, as well as other related processes – have consistently risen, despite a slight decrease associated with COVID-19 lockdowns, which abruptly slowed economic activities (BP, Citation2021, https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-fuel). In 1992, global CO2 emissions across this sector encompassed 8.4 Gt from coal, 9.2 Gt from oil, and 4.0 Gt from gas, yielding a total of 21.6 Gt. Peaking in 2019, emissions included 14.7 Gt from coal, 12.2 Gt from oil, and 7.4 Gt from gas, and yielded a total of 34.3 Gt (https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-fuel). Despite the 5.1% decrease in CO2 emissions from fossil fuels across this sector in 2020, a sharp recovery of global economy in 2021 has led to a 6.0% rise in global emissions, spiking to the highest ever level of 36.3 Gt (IEA, Citation2022), equating a 68% increase since 1992. Despite the constant growth of the renewable energy sub-sector over time, global electricity demand is currently met by 63.3% fossil fuels, 10.4% nuclear, and only 26.3% renewable sources. Among the fossil fuels, the current share of GHG sources is 36.7% coal, 23.5% gas, and 3.1% oil (% of the entire energy sector). Among the renewables, sources are 15.8% hydropower, 5.3% wind, 2.7% solar, and 2.5% other (% of the entire energy sector) (https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix). Including all sub-sectors, the energy sector is responsible for 29–35% of global GHGs (https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data; https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/change-of-co2-eq-emissions-2#tab-dashboard-01).

2.2. The industry sector

Over the last decades, the global industry sector has been increasingly emitting GHGs. In addition to CO2, industrial activities are a major source of other GHGs. For example, over the long-run, industrial-derived N2O emissions have particularly increased in North America (Xu et al., Citation2021) and South Asia (Bansal et al., Citation2022). Overall, among the different industrial sub-sectors, the production of steel (Wang et al., Citation2021) and other metals (e.g. aluminium) encompasses one of the largest GHG emitters (Haraldsson et al., Citation2021). Between 1992–2015, global GHG emissions from the steel industry alone rose by~200% (Wang et al., Citation2021). In 2019, global GHGs from the steel industry alone yielded approximately 3.6 Gt CO2, encompassing 7–11% of total anthropogenic CO2 emissions (https://www.globalefficiencyintel.com/new-blog/2021/global-steel-industrys-ghg-emissions; https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-these-553-steel-plants-are-responsible-for-9-of-global-co2-emissions/). Another major sub-sector is the mining industry, in which GHGs are emitted throughout excavation, processing, and manufacturing activities (L. Y. Liu et al., Citation2021). An additional major sub-sector encompasses the chemical and petro-chemical industries, which are major sources of CO2 and CH4 (Rahman et al., Citation2022; Zhang et al., Citation2019). Globally, the industry sector accounts for 21–24% of GHGs (https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data; https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector).

2.3. The land-use & land-use change (LULUC) and agricultural sector

Within this sector, the conversion of natural lands to croplands and grazing lands encompasses a major source of GHGs. Often, particularly in the tropics, this includes deforestation and burning of vegetation cover, an enormous source of CO2 emissions (FAO, Citation2020). Further, land-use changes lead to the decomposition of large amounts of safely-stored soil organic carbon, which oxidises and turns into atmospheric CO2 (Bennetzen et al., Citation2016b). Prescribed fires, a regular management practice in extensive grasslands and savannahs, also emit considerable amounts of CO2 (FAO, Citation2020). In croplands, another major source of GHGs is attributed to nitrogen fertilisers, which emit huge amounts of N2O. Agricultural CH4 is mostly attributed to livestock systems, and specifically to ruminant animals, as well as to paddy cropping systems, and particularly to rice cultivation (Bennetzen et al., Citation2016a; Islam et al., Citation2020). Despite a decreasing trend in global GHG emissions from some of these sub-sectors during the last decades, other sub-sectors have faced an increasing trend. For example, between 2000–2018, along with declining deforestation rates, land-use change-imposed emissions decreased by 22% – from 5.0 to 3.9 Gt CO2e. Simultaneously, emissions from crop and livestock systems increased by 15% – from 4.6 to 5.3 Gt CO2e – with livestock systems contributing two thirds of this measure. Combining these divergent trends results in a 3.0% net decrease in GHG emissions across the entire LULUC/agricultural sector over this period (FAO, Citation2020). This trend consists with other studies, which showed a net decrease in global GHG emissions across this sector since the early 1990s, and attributed this trend to improved efficiency in agricultural production systems (Gaihre et al., Citation2015; Bennetzen et al., Citation2016a; Citation2016b). Overall, emissions from this sector encompass 17–24% of global GHGs (FAO, Citation2020; https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data; https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector).

2.4. The transportation sector

Emitted GHGs from fossil fuel combustion in transportation are comprised of~95% CO2, and small amounts of N2O, CH4, and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) (https://www.transportation.gov/sustainability/climate/transportation-ghg-emissions-and-trends). In 1992, global GHG emissions from transportation amounted to 4.87 Gt CO2e. In 2019, emissions from this sector rose to 8.43 Gt CO2e, representing a 73% increase over almost three decades (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1084096/ghg-emissions-transportation-sector-globally/). In 2020, due to the COVID-19 lockdown, emissions from this sector dropped by 15%, to 7.20 Gt CO2e (https://www.iea.org/topics/transport). Despite some rebound in 2021, the sector has still faced a 3% decrease compared to the 2019 level (https://www.iea.org/topics/transport). Within this sector, the major emission sources are road transport (78%), shipping (11%), and aviation (8%), as well as railways that encompass a smaller source (3%) (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1185535/transport-carbon-dioxide-emissions-breakdown/). Within the road transport sub-sector, the growing share of hybrid, hybrid-plug-in, and electric cars (https://www.bts.gov/content/gasoline-hybrid-and-electric-vehicle-sales) has not succeeded in decelerating GHG emissions over time. This is presumably related to the total increasing number of road vehicles, specifically passenger cars, over the last decades (Dargay et al., Citation2007; Lian et al., Citation2018). Including all sub-sectors, transportation is the source of 14–16% of global GHGs (https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data; https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector).

2.5. The building/construction sector

Emissions from this sector are distributed among the sub-sectors of construction and related industries (43%), residential (direct and indirect: 20%), non-residential (direct and indirect: 17%), and other (20%). Until 2018, global emissions by this sector continuously increased. The COVID-19 economic slowdown led to a two-year decrease, which has since returned to an increasing trend. Yet, over time, improved efficiency across all sub-sectors, alongside the introduction of advanced building methodologies and the expansion of innovative construction materials, have somewhat mitigated the rising emissions (UNEP, Citation2021). Among the construction materials, cement is the dominant GHG emitter, followed by steel, aluminium, glass, wood, and copper (Zhong et al., Citation2021). The production of cement is highly carbon-intensive, as enormous amounts of fossil fuels are needed to heat a mixture of limestone and clay to over 1,400 °C. The following chemical reactions between the two substances release an additional 600 kg CO2 for each tonne of cement produced (Nature Editors, Citation2021). Emission of GHGs have tripled in the last three decades and doubled in the last two decades. Global emissions from this industry encompassed 915, 1,305, 2,339, and 2,897 Mt CO2 in 1992, 2001, 2011, and 2021, respectively (https://apnews.com/article/climate-science-china-pollution-3d97642acbb07fca7540edca38448266). In total, this sector accounts for 6–11% of global GHGs (https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data; https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector).

2.6. The waste treatment/disposal sector

Wastes from several sources, including food and other biogenic materials, municipal solids, industrial solids, sewage sludge, and more (Crippa et al., Citation2021), emit considerable amounts of GHGs. Within this sector, landfills and wastewater are the main source of GHG emissions, specifically CH4. In landfills, CH4 encompasses~50% of all GHG emissions. In sewage sludge facilities, the CH4 share of total GHGs varies greatly, depending on the properties of the processed material, processing procedures, moisture content, and ambient temperature, which determine the prevailing aerobic vs. anaerobic conditions and the efficiency of methanogenesis (IPCC, Citation2006a). Overall, waste treatment/disposal accounts for 20–30% of global anthropogenic CH4 emissions (Crippa et al., Citation2021; https://climatechampions.unfccc.int/a-clarion-call-to-reduce-and-phase-out-of-open-waste-burning/). In addition to CH4, solid wastes also emit smaller amounts of CO2 and N2O (IPCC, Citation2006a). Yet, when solid wastes are intentionally (or spontaneously) burnt in open dumps or residential sites – a common practice in many developing countries (Gautam & Agrawal, Citation2021) – CO2 emissions, and to some extent N2O emissions, become much greater (IPCC, Citation2006b). Further, this mismanagement practice accounts for 11% of global emissions of the short-lived GHG black carbon (https://climatechampions.unfccc.int/a-clarion-call-to-reduce-and-phase-out-of-open-waste-burning/). Overall, emissions from this sector are responsible for 5–12% of global GHGs (Gautam & Agrawal, Citation2021; https://climatechampions.unfccc.int/a-clarion-call-to-reduce-and-phase-out-of-open-waste-burning/).

3. Time to act

On the bright side, GHG reductions in the LULUC/agriculture sector over the last decades (Bennetzen et al., Citation2016a), and the projected continued decreasing emissions in the coming decades (Bennetzen et al., Citation2016b) are encouraging. Such sectorial trends are rather remarkable, especially due to the global increase of 47% in human population over the last three decades – from 5.3 billion in 1990 to 7.8 billion in 2020 (https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth), and the projected increase to 9.8 billion in 2050 (https://www.un.org/en/desa/world-population-projected-reach-98-billion-2050-and-112-billion-2100). At the same time, incessantly increasing emissions in sub-sectors such as electricity production, heat generation, metal manufacturing, chemical production, road and aviation transport, and cement production, and moreover in entire sectors such as energy, industry, transportation, waste treatment/disposal, and building/construction, demonstrate the dark side (Minx et al., Citation2021). Specifically, under the SSP1–2.6/RCP2.6 scenario, global GHGs by building and construction materials alone are forecasted to increase from 3.5 GT CO2e in 2020 to 4.6 CO2e in 2060 (Zhong et al., Citation2021).

Climate tipping points occur when global warming pushes temperatures beyond a critical threshold, generating accelerated and irreversible impacts, with complex chains of interactions among the cryosphere, ocean/atmosphere, and biosphere (McKay et al., Citation2022). For example, the melting ice sheets in Greenland release fresh water into the ocean, and decelerate the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). The latter, partly driven by dense, salty water descending towards the ocean floor, becomes weaker, decreasing heat transport from the tropics to the North Pole. In turn, this warms the seawater in the Southern Ocean, increasing ice sheet melting in Antarctica, causing sea level to rise, and accelerating the melting of additional ice sheets. The weakened Gulf Stream – which encompasses an important part in the AMOC and has substantially warmed over the last decades – has become less effective in regulating the mild climatic conditions over Western Europe, disrupting precipitation patterns across the region. Further, the interrupted Atlantic currents adversely affect climatic conditions across the Amazon, where reduced precipitations have led to desiccation and mass mortality of trees (Wunderling et al., Citation2021). The dead trees halt to assimilate carbon, and moreover, become available to fuel high-severity forest wildfires (both in the Amazon Basin and elsewhere), releasing enormous amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere, thus generating a climate positive feedback loop (Choat et al., Citation2018). The simultaneous thawing of extensive carbon-rich permafrost systems, induced by global warming, emits huge amounts of CO2 and CH4, generating an additional climate positive feedback loop (Natali et al., Citation2021).

Therefore, in terms of climate change tipping points, time is running out. In 2021, global emissions of CO2 alone led to an 8.7% reduction in the remaining credit for limiting global warming to 1.5°C. If current emission rates continue, the entire credit may be fully exploited within approximately one decade (Z. Liu et al., Citation2022). Despite some uncertainties in terms of climatic processes and feedbacks, as well as in the relative share of emissions by each socioeconomic sector, there is no doubt that the next few years are critical. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C or 2.0°C by 2100 will require total GHG to peak before 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by 43% or 25%, respectively, in 2030 relative to 2019, followed by zero net emissions in the early 2050s or 2070s, respectively (IPCC, Citation2022). However, according to a recent study, the current global warming of~1.1°C compared to preindustrial times already lies within the lower end of five climate tipping points’ uncertainty ranges. Also, according to the very same study, global warming ranging between 1.5–2.0°C would likely trigger several tipping points, such as ice sheet collapse in Greenland and west Antarctica, extensive permafrost thawing in northern latitudes, and die-off of low-latitudinal coral reefs, stressing the need to limit global warming to 1.5°C (McKay et al., Citation2022).

One way or another, in order to successfully mitigate climate change, conclusive intergovernmental policies, coupled with effective decision making at all levels, should call for immediate, substantial and binding emission reductions across all socioeconomic sectors, as the time to act is now, before the window of opportunity closes. Policymaking and legislation at all levels should generate the transformation to circular economy and promote complementary environmental strategies. In the energy sector, there is a need in accelerating the development of renewable energy technologies, increase their energy efficiency, and invest in energy storage means. In the industry sector, it is necessary to foster cleantech and environmentally-friendly industries, and convert to renewable raw materials. In the LULUC/agricultural sector, supporting afforestation, reforestation, agroforestry, and silvopasture, promoting conservation agricultural practices, such as reduced tillage systems, water-saving means, and precision nutrient management, ensuring the restoration of degraded lands, and investing in food-tech innovations, are urgently needed. In the transportation sector, encouraging the use of public transportation means and investing in innovative/clean transportation means are necessary. In the building/construction sector, progressing green building methods, renewable construction materials, and the use of energy-saving architectural methods, should be promoted. In the waste treatment/disposal sector, maximising the reuse, recycle, and recovery of materials, while minimising waste disposal should be sped up. Concordantly with the reduction of GHGs, such steps are also expected to decrease the emission of contaminants, thus sustaining environmental quality and human health (Stavi, Citation2022).

Acknowledgments

The Dead Sea and Arava Science Center is supported by the Israel Ministry of Science and Technology. The author is grateful to Michelle Finzi for proofreading the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Data availability statement

The author confirms that the data supporting this study are available within the article. No proprietary datasets were used in this article.

References

  • Bansal, S., Raghuram, N., Adhya, T. K., Rahman, M. M., Tshering, D., Dahal, K. R., Wakeel, A., Aminath, S., Safi, Z., Nissanka, S., Pathak, H., Aziz, T., Naher, U. A., Dandeniya, W., Biswas, J. C., Taneja, J., Panda, A. N., Kaushik, H., Jain, N. … Sutton, M. A. (2022). Long-term trends of direct nitrous oxide emission from fuel combustion in South Asia. Environmental Research Letters, 17(4), 045028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5cf7
  • Bennetzen, E. H., Smith, P., & Porter, J. R. (2016a). Agricultural production and greenhouse gas emissions from world regions—the major trends over 40 years. Global Environmental Change, 37, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.004
  • Bennetzen, E. H., Smith, P., & Porter, J. R. (2016b). Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970–2050. Global Change Biology, 22(2), 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13120
  • BP. (2021). Statistical review of world energy. British Petroleum, https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2021-full-report.pdf
  • Choat, B., Brodribb, T. J., Brodersen, C. R., Duursma, R. A., López, R., & Medlyn, B. E. (2018). Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature, 558(7711), 531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0240-x
  • Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Solazzo, E., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Banja, M., Olivier, J. G. J., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., & Vignati, E. (2021). GHG emissions of all world countries - 2021 report, EUR 30831 EN. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Dargay, J., Gately, D., & Sommer, M. (2007). Vehicle ownership and income growth, worldwide: 1960-2030. The Energy Journal, 28(4), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No4-7
  • FAO. (2020). Emissions due to agriculture. Global, regional and country trends 2000–2018. FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No 18, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/cb3808en/cb3808en.pdf
  • Gaihre, Y. K., Singh, U., Islam, S. M. M., Huda, A., Islam, M. R., Satter, M. A., Sanabria, J., Islam, M. R., & Shah, A. L. (2015). Impacts of urea deep placement on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from rice fields in Bangladesh. Geoderma, 259–260, 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.06.001
  • Gautam, M., & Agrawal, M. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management: A review of global scenario. In S. S. Muthu (Ed.), Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes (pp. 123–160). Springer.
  • Haraldsson, J., Johnsson, S., Thollander, P., & Wallén, M. (2021). Taxonomy, saving potentials and key performance indicators for energy end-use and greenhouse gas emissions in the aluminium industry and aluminium casting foundries. Energies, 14(12), 3571. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123571
  • IEA. (2022). Global energy review: CO2 emissions in 2021. International Energy Agency. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/c3086240-732b-4f6a-89d7-db01be018f5e/GlobalEnergyReviewCO2Emissionsin2021.pdf
  • IPCC. (2006a). Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 5: waste, chapter 3: solid waste disposal. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_3_Ch3_SWDS.pdf
  • IPCC. (2006b). Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 5: waste, chapter 5: incineration and open burning of wastes. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_5_Ch5_IOB.pdf
  • IPCC. (2019). Global warming of 1.5 °C. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Summary_Volume_Low_Res.pdf
  • IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022 – mitigation of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FinalDraft_FullReport.pdf
  • Islam, S. M. M., Gaihre, Y. K., Islam, M. R., Akter, M., Al Mahmud, A., Singh, U., & Sander, B. O. (2020). Effects of water management on greenhouse gas emissions from farmers’ rice fields in Bangladesh. The Science of the Total Environment, 734, 139382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139382
  • Lian, L., Tian, W., Xu, H., & Zheng, M. (2018). Modeling and forecasting passenger car ownership based on symbolic regression. Sustainability, 10(7), 2275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072275
  • Liao, X., Xu, W., Zhang, J., Li, Y., & Tian, Y. (2019). Global exposure to rainstorms and the contribution rates of climate change and population change. The Science of the Total Environment, 663, 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.290
  • Liu, L. Y., Ji, H. G., Lü, X. F., Wang, T., Zhi, S., Pei, F., & Quan, D. L. (2021). Mitigation of greenhouse gases released from mining activities: A review. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 28(4), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2155-4
  • Liu, Z., Deng, Z., Davis, S. J., Giron, C., & Ciais, P. (2022). Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2021. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(4), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00285-w
  • McKay, D. I. A., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockström, J., & Lenton, T. M. (2022). Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science, 377(6611), 1171. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950
  • Minx, J. C., Lamb, W. F., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Crippa, M., Döbbeling, N., Forster, P. M., Guizzardi, D., Olivier, J., Peters, G. P., Pongratz, J., Reisinger, A., Rigby, M., Saunois, M., Smith, S. J., Solazzo, E., & Tian, H. (2021). A comprehensive and synthetic dataset for global, regional, and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2018 with an extension to 2019. Earth Systems Science Data, 13(11), 5213–5252. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5213-2021
  • Natali, S. M., Holdren, J. P., Rogers, B. M., Treharne, R., Duffy, P. B., Pomerance, R., & MacDonald, E. (2021). Permafrost carbon feedbacks threaten global climate goals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118, e2100163118.
  • Nature Editors. (2021). Concrete needs to lose its colossal carbon footprint. Nature, 597(7878), 593–594. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02612-5
  • Naumann, G., Alfieri, L., Wyser, K., Mentaschi, L., Betts, R. A., Carrao, H., Spinoni, J., Vogt, V., & Feyen, L. (2018). Global changes in drought conditions under different levels of warming. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(7), 3285–3296. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076521
  • Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. S., Chowdhury, S. R., Elhaj, A., Razzak, S. A., Abu Shoaib, S., Islam, M. K., Islam, M. M., Rushd, S., & Rahman, S. M. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions in the industrial processes and product use sector of Saudi Arabia—An emerging challenge. Sustainability, 14(12), 7388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127388
  • Seo, N. S. (2017). Beyond the Paris agreement: climate change policy negotiations and future directions. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 9(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12090
  • Shukla, P. R., Skea, J., Slade, R., van Diemen, R., Haughey, E., Malley, J., Pathak, M., & Portugal Pereira, J. (2019). Technical summary. In P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H. O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, & J. Malley. (Eds.), Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. IPCC Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/11/03_Technical-Summary-TS.pdf
  • Stavi, I. (2022). Rio (1992) to Glasgow (2021): three decades of inadequate mitigation of climate change and its slow onset effects. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 999788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.999788
  • UNEP. (2021). 2021 global status report for buildings and construction: towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. United Nations Environment Programme. https://globalabc.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/GABC_Buildings-GSR-2021_BOOK.pdf
  • Wamsler, C., Schäpke, N., Fraude, C., Stasiak, D., Bruhn, T., Lawrence, M., Schroeder, H., & Mundaca, L. (2020). Enabling new mindsets and transformative skills for negotiating and activating climate action: lessons from UNFCCC conferences of the parties. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.005
  • Wang, P., Ryberg, M., Yang, Y., Feng, K., Kara, S., Hauschild, M., & Chen, W. Q. (2021). Efficiency stagnation in global steel production urges joint supply- and demand-side mitigation efforts. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22245-6
  • WMO. (2022). United in science 2022 – a multi-organization high-level compilation of the most recent science related to climate change, impacts and responses. World Meteorological Organization. https://www.undrr.org/publication/united-science-2022-multi-organization-high-level-compilation-latest-climate-science
  • Wunderling, N., Donges, J. F., Kurths, J., & Winkelmann, R. (2021). Interacting tipping elements increase risk of climate domino effects under global warming. Earth System Dynamics, 12(2), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-601-2021
  • Xu, R., Tian, H., Pan, N., Thompson, R. L., Canadell, J. G., Davidson, E. A., Nevison, C., Winiwarter, W., Shi, H., Pan, S., Chang, J., Ciais, P., Dangal, S. R. S., Ito, A., Jackson, R. B., Joos, F., Lauerwald, R., Lienert, S., Maavara, T. … Zhou, F. (2021). Magnitude and uncertainty of nitrous oxide emissions from North America based on bottom-up and top-down approaches: informing future research and national inventories. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(23), e2021GL095264. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095264
  • Zhang, T., Zhang, Y., Chang, Y., Duan, D., & Liu, X. (2019). Methodology of methane emission accounting in petrochemical and chemical industries of China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 398(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/398/1/012011
  • Zhong, X., Hu, M., Deetman, S., Steubing, B., Lin, H. X., Hernandez, G. A., Harpprecht, C., Zhang, C., Tukker, A., & Behrens, P. (2021). Global greenhouse gas emissions from residential and commercial building materials and mitigation strategies to 2060. Nature Communications, 12(1), 6126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26212-z