This article evaluates conflicting interpretations of political violence during South Africa's transition between 1990 and 1994. Its point of departure is the Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). It is argued that the 'third force' interpretation favoured by the TRC does not provide a convincing explanation of the violence, especially after the Record of Understanding of September 1992. Alternative explanations, including that the violence was the product of political competition among parties contending for power in post-apartheid South Africa, are analysed. It is also contended that hitherto accounts of the transition have tended to underestimate the impact that violence had on the country's political transformation.
Interpretations of political violence during South Africa's transition
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.