In this article I trace the process of uncovering a unifying thread in the multiple meanings of quality in work. I do this by reflecting on the process of assembling my evaluation dossier after my first year as an assistant professor. As a parallel and alternative process to the traditional assessment of the work of academics, I perform a critically reflexive self-assessment exercise that applies the action-research methodology of appreciative inquiry to the artefacts of my working autobiography. I re-present the quality moments of other university actors in the process of remembering the best of my lived experience of quality related to the traditional evaluation categories of teaching, research and service. I arrive at a provocative account of quality to the effect that quality across the span of teaching, research, and service work resembles service constituted as a morally response-able relationship.
A Provocation: Quality is service
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.