Opportunities to study and explain academics' responses to the growth of external quality monitoring and the extension of institutions' own quality systems have remained largely unexploited. Based on a single-site case study of a university sector college (NewColl), the paper highlights the merits of close-up study in enabling questions to be posed that other approaches are not as well placed to address. With the aid of interview data, the 'implementation gap' between the intentions underpinning 'quality policy' and the actual outcomes is examined. A number of dimensions of the 'implementation gap' are identified, each deriving from situational factors affecting how academics view external and internal quality monitoring systems and frameworks. It is argued that if academics are to remain pivotal in efforts to improve the quality of teaching and learning, then more attention needs to be paid, by institutions and external quality bodies, to the importance of the conditions and context of academics' work. Otherwise, quality monitoring is liable to be invested with a 'beast-like' presence requiring to be 'fed' with ritualistic practices by academics seeking to meet accountability requirements.
Feeding the Beast or Improving Quality?: Academics' perceptions of quality assurance and quality monitoring
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.