Abstract
Previous studies using a restricted range of split field chimeric faces suggest that the processing of facial emotional expressions is a highly lateralised phenomenon. Two theories have emerged with regard to the role the two cerebral hemispheres play in this processing. The "right hemisphere" hypothesis (e.g. Borod, Koff, Lorch, & Nicholas, 1988) suggests that the right hemisphere plays a prominent role in the processing of both positive and negative facial expressions. In contrast, the "valence hypothesis" (e.g. Reuter-Lorenz & Davidson, 1981) proposes that, while the right hemisphere plays the major role in processing negative emotions, the left hemisphere has a special role for positive emotions. Using all six of the human "universal facial expressions" (Ekman &Friesen, 1971) we present evidence that, superimposed onto a left visual field advantage (right hemisphere specialisation) for emotional processing, there is a "left shift" (right visual field advantage) for pro- as opposed to anti-social expression. We propose that facial expressions that are likely to be related to approach for communicative purposes initiate a greater degree of left hemisphere involvement. As a consequence, we suggest that for future laterality studies, the six universal emotional expressions should be reconsidered using a pro- to anti-social dimension rather than positive and negative groupings.