Abstract
There is a strong case that people construct and manipulate mental models in working memory but relatively little evidence that mental models are preserved in long-term memory. Instead people may remember an episodic construction trace: a record of the operations used to construct a mental model (Payne, 1993). Experiment 1 investigated memory for determinate spatial descriptions (which describe a single configuration of objects) and indeterminate spatial descriptions (which describe two equally plausible configurations). Recognition performance was impaired when the overlap between the episodic construction trace of a description at learning and at test was disrupted by reordering the sentences within a description. Participants were better at remembering the gist of determinate descriptions than that of indeterminate descriptions. For indeterminate descriptions, provided differences in gist recognition were controlled, participants showed better memory for the original description. Experiment 2 showed a similar pattern of results with temporal descriptions. A third experiment manipulated the similarity between foils in the recognition test and the original descriptions to provide further evidence for both episodic construction trace and remembered mental models. In combination, these results favour a hybrid account of memory for mental models, which includes information about both construction processes and model structure.
