Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of age on the practice, roles, status and attitudes of psychiatrists within the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP).
Method: A postal survey of Fellows of the RANZCP resident in Australia or New Zealand was conducted. The main outcome measures were: age; location and type of psychiatric practice; hours of work; attitudes towards re-accreditation; changes in work practices over the career; and the perceived benefits and drawbacks of age to psychiatric practice and case selection.
Results: Of 1086 eligible subjects, 629 participated. The mean age of the sample was 52.7 years (SD = 13.5). Those psychiatrists favouring re-accreditation were younger. Psychiatrists practising psychotherapy, forensic psychiatry or general psychiatry; working in psychiatric hospitals and private practice were more likely to be older. Older psychiatrists worked shorter hours. There was largely no association between case selection and age. Psychiatrists reporting increased credibility and respect as a benefit of their current age upon their psychiatric practice were older, as were those identifying fatigue and an inability to keep up to date as a drawback of age. Psychiatrists reporting a lack of credibility and respect were younger, as were those who reported increased enthusiasm and optimism.
Conclusions: Age is associated with benefits and drawbacks to the practice of psychiatry and this may be reflected in the different practice profiles of older and younger psychiatrists.