24
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Criteria for involuntary hospitalisation

&
Pages 729-733 | Received 22 May 1998, Accepted 16 Jun 1999, Published online: 07 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the ethical bases of compulsory commitment legislation.

Method: The ethical principles of beneficence and autonomy are examined and used to identify criteria for the commitment of mentally ill patients.

Results: Two aspects of beneficence, medical paternalism and social paternalism, are discussed. It is argued that social paternalism is insufficient ethically to warrant involuntary admission, and that the basis for compulsory hospitalisation is medical paternalism.

Conclusion: The central role of autonomy in medical ethics suggests a patient should have a diminished capacity for autonomous decision-making and a potential to benefit from hospitalisation, as well as a risk of harm to self (including self-neglect) to warrant committal. In specific circumstances, the risk of harm to others may also justify committal. These ethical principles may be at odds with public attitudes.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.