Abstract
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 878-881. © Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002 Background. To evaluate the risk of hemorrhage during hysteroscopic surgery. Methods. Cases of hemorrhage during hysteroscopic surgery were assessed in a single center, observational, prospective study conducted from 1990 to 2000, including 2116 surgical hysteroscopies. Risk of hemorrhage was evaluated according to the hysteroscopic procedure. The management of this complication was also noted. Results. Thirteen cases (0.61%) were reported. In six cases, hemorrhage stopped spontaneously. For six patients, a Foley (no. 10) probe was introduced into the uterine cavity and inflated for 24 h to stop hemorrhage. For one patient, immediately from the start of the procedure, the uterine arteries were ligatured through the vaginal route in order to stop bleeding. Haemorrhage risk was higher during hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with endometrial ablation {Relative risk [RR] 5.22 (1.26-21.64); p = 0.02}, polyp [RR 5.3 (1.04-27.09); p = 0.04], and fibroid resections [RR 6.55 (1.58-27.17); p = 0.01]. Haemorrhage risk was however, comparable for endometrial ablation, uterus septa section, polyp, and fibroid resections ( p = 0.92). Conclusions. Hemorrhage risk is higher during synechiolysis compared with other procedures. An inflated Foley probe may be an efficient means of stopping hemorrhage.