Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B
Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes
Volume 38, 2003 - Issue 3
384
Views
128
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exposure to Low Doses of Endosulfan and Chlorpyrifos Modifies Endogenous Antioxidants in Tissues of Rats

&
Pages 349-363 | Received 28 Aug 2002, Published online: 24 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted in male SD rats (225–250 g) to determine changes in the activities of endogenous antioxidants superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and concentrations of glutathione (GSH) in tissues after exposure to low doses of endosulfan and chlorpyrifos using a whole body exposure technique. In both experiments, 6 rats/group were exposed 3 hr/day, 5 days/week for 30 days to: 0 (control), 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60% of LD50 of either pesticide in 50% ethanol; actual concentrations were: endosulfan = 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 mg/250 g body weight; chlorpyrifos = 0, 1.9, 3.8, 7.6, 15.2, and 22.8 mg/250 g body weight. Endosulfan decreased erythrocyte SOD by 21% in all groups and chlorpyrifos increased SOD by 18% in groups 40 and 60. Liver SOD was 12%–20% lower after endosulfan exposure; lung SOD was altered: endosulfan decreased activity by 21% and 51% and chlorpyrifos by 58 and 75% in the 40 and 60 groups, respectively (P ≤ 0.05). Both pesticides increased plasma GPX activity at lower levels and reduced it by 26% and 19% in groups 40 and 60, respectively (P ≤ 0.05). Liver GPX increased in the 60 group and lung GPX declined between 20% and 38% after endosulfan exposure. GSH in the liver and lung: endosulfan reduced GSH by about 30% at lower levels and increased by 41% or 70% at higher levels; chlorpyrifos decreased GSH by 28–40% in 20 and 60 groups, respectively (P ≤ 0.05). Exposure to low, increasing levels of endosulfan and chlorpyrifos can differentially modify endogenous antioxidants SOD, GPX and GSH, which may lead to the development of oxidative stress in some tissues.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Joyce Owens (Animal Facility Manager) for her cooperation and thank the students who participated in the animal experiments and helped in the laboratory: T. Archie and K. Tipton. This research was funded by the USDA Cooperative State Research Extension and Education Service (CSREES) grant to Kentucky State University (KYX‐50‐99‐14H).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.