Examination Of Preproduction Samples Of Uop Ionsiv ^® Ie-910 And Ie-911

Abstract

Researchers from across the Department of Energy (DOE) complex performed experiments to assess the impact of manufacturing changes on the use of IONSIV^® IE-911, the engineered form of crystalline silicotitanate (CST), for the removal of cesium from Savannah River Site (SRS) high-level waste. Prompted by previously supplied data, UOP changed the manufacturing process to minimize the chemical instability of the inorganic sorbent that manifests itself as niobium and silicon leaching. This report includes results of the extensive examination of newly prepared laboratory-scale and preproduction samples of caustic-washed CST as compared to similar performance data for commercially available and baseline samples.

Testing indicates that the revised manufacturing process removed most of the niobium (Nb) that previously readily leached from the sorbent under test conditions. The revised manufacturing also reduced the amount of easily leached silicon (Si), but a significant fraction of this material remains. Microscopic analysis indicates the presence of amorphous Si. Cesium capacity (mg Cs/g CST) or distribution coefficient (K_d) of the preproduction sample compares favorably to the baseline sample and exceeds that observed for the laboratory-scale sample made using the revised manufacturing process. Column breakthrough experiment indicates that the manufacturing change did not affect the mass-transfer zone length. Lastly, pore analysis, particle size, thermal behavior, and packing density measurements indicate that the manufacturing process change does not affect these bulk properties for the engineered material.

^#This report was prepared for the United States Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 and is an account of work performed under that contract. Accordingly, the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring of same by Westinghouse Savannah River Company or by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state of reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Keywords:

• Salt waste processing facility
• Cesium

Acknowledgments

The contributors at the various DOE sites (SRS, ORNL, PNNL, and SNL) prove too numerous to list. Their efforts, though, behind the scenes enabled completion of this work. However, the contributions of four people who guided this testing deserve acknowledgement. They are Rich Braun and Nan Greenlay at UOP; Dennis Wester, who serves as the TFA System Lead for this technology; and Joe Carter from High Level Waste Engineering.

Notes

^#This report was prepared for the United States Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 and is an account of work performed under that contract. Accordingly, the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring of same by Westinghouse Savannah River Company or by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state of reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.