169
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Cesium Removal from Savannah River Site Radioactive Waste using the Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) Process

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 297-309 | Published online: 09 Nov 2011
 

Abstract:

Researchers at the Savannah River National Laboratory successfully demonstrated the Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) process flow sheet using a 33-stage, 2-cm centrifugal contactor apparatus in two 24 h tests using actual high-level waste. The CSSX process for removal of cesium from alkaline solutions is the reference process for decontamination of high-level waste (HLW) at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The solvent consists of a calix[4]arene-crown-6 extractant, an alkyl-phenoxy alcohol modifier, and trioctylamine dissolved in an inert hydrocarbon matrix. Previously, we demonstrated the solvent extraction process with actual SRS HLW supernatant solution using a nonoptimized solvent formulation. Following that test, the solvent system was optimized to enhance extractant solubility in the diluent by increasing the modifier concentration. We now report results of two tests with the new and optimized solvent. The first test used a composite of supernatant solutions from two waste tanks, and the second test used a solution derived from dissolved salt cake. Test results showed that the CSSX process using the optimized solvent reduces 137Cs in HLW supernatant solutions to concentrations below the waste acceptance criterion of 45nCi/g for disposal as low-level waste (called “saltstone”). Waste decontamination factors as high as three million were achieved during testing. Test durations exceeded 24 h of uninterrupted operation and demonstrated hydraulic stability of the contactor array while operating with the optimized solvent. Carryover of organic solvent in aqueous streams (and aqueous in organic streams) was found to be less Ilian 1 %. The concentration factor (i.e., the ratio of the cesium concentration in the strip raftinate to the concentration in the waste) averaged approximately 13 during both tests, slightly below the process requirement of 15. Uncertainties in process flow-rate measurement and control prevented the test from achieving the target of 15.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.