Charity Basket or Revolution: Beliefs, Experiences, and Context in Preservice Teachers’ Service Learning

Abstract

Given what one observer calls the “vast disparity of definitions that faculty can bring to service learning—from what is basically the charity basket approach to the revolutionary,” service learning can vary tremendously, from reading to elderly residents of a nursing home to organizing a boycott of a sneaker company. With such diversity before teachers, what influences them in the way they design service learning? How do preservice teachers, for whom so many ideas about teaching are emerging, make such choices? Two case studies suggest that preservice teachers’ beliefs, experiences, and the context where they teach play an important role related to if and how they use service learning. Beliefs and experiences are especially important because, although service learning is often presented as supporting apolitical values—empowerment and responsibility, for example—for which broad consensus exists, such values are also ambiguous and open to interpretation. Teacher educators and advocates of service learning need to acknowledge the ambiguous political nature of service and service learning. By doing so, they have an opportunity to make the political context of teaching explicit for preservice teachers. Such education in service learning for new teachers goes beyond “training” in the logistical and technical details of implementing a new pedagogy to thoughtful reflection on the value-laden act of teaching.