16
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Critical Analysis and Philosophical Review of ‘Rapid Reburial’: the Clarence project

&
Pages 371-381 | Received 07 Apr 2015, Accepted 07 Apr 2015, Published online: 15 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

In 2012, Australian cultural heritage practitioners and conservation scientists collaborated on a national underwater cultural heritage (UCH) reburial project, known as the Australian Historic Shipwreck Preservation Project (AHSPP) funded by the Australian Research Council. This resulted in the excavation, documentation and reburial of the ‘at risk’ shipwreck Clarence. Following the excavation, the site and associated artefacts were reburied and subsequently covered by shade cloth and finally, with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tarpaulins. After completion of the in situ reburial, a number of critical issues were put into sharp relief including: what constitutes the accurate identification of a site as being ‘at risk’; and the implications of ‘rapid reburial’.

Acknowledgements

The AHSPP wishes to thank Heritage Victoria (Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development) and the Western Australian Museum for their considerable logistical support and ongoing fieldwork operations. We would also like to thank our partner organizations, their staff and our phenomenal volunteers who contributed time and expertise during the Clarence fieldwork. Partner Organizations associated with this project are: the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, the Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development (Heritage Victoria), the Western Australian Museum (Partner Investigators Dr Ian MacLeod and Ms Vicki Richards), Australasian Institute for Maritime Archaeology, New South Wales Office of Environment & Heritage, Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service, Northern Territory Government, Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, the Norfolk Island Museum and the Australian National Maritime Museum. We thank three reviewers for their comments and take full responsibility for this final copy.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.