Protection motivation theory and pro‐environmental behaviour: A systematic mapping review

Abstract

Objective

Climate change and related issues associated with the interaction of humans with the environment are of great importance in today's context. More and more research is focusing on understanding what can be done to prevent and reverse the effects of environmental problems through individual behaviours. Within psychology, there is a lack of synthesis of what drives pro‐environmental behaviours in various paradigms and how they can be changed. The current study focuses on the application of protection motivation theory to predicting and changing pro‐environmental behaviours using a systematic mapping approach.

Methods

A systematic screening of 132 databases was performed, resulting in the identification of 22 relevant studies with the total N = 12,827.

Results

Investigation of the included research revealed a number of gaps in knowledge including: lack of experimental evidence with successful manipulations of protection motivation theory constructs; non‐inclusion of all the aspects of the theory into studies; the absence of examination of the intention–behaviour relationship; the lack of consistency in operationalisation of protection motivation theory constructs; a focus on predominantly western high income societies, and the lack of uniformity in the definition of pro‐environmental behaviours.

Conclusion

Future research should consider employing experimental designs with proper manipulation checks and longitudinal focus, as well as consistent definitions and operationalisations of relevant concepts, and exploring these constructs across different countries.

Key words:

• conservation psychology
• environmental psychology
• pro‐environmental behaviour
• protection motivation theory
• systematic mapping review

Funding information Deakin University's Health ReseArch Capacity Building Grant ScHeme

Funding information Deakin University's Health ReseArch Capacity Building Grant ScHeme

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported in part by the Deakin University's Health ReseArch Capacity Building Grant ScHeme (HAtCH).

Notes

Funding information Deakin University's Health ReseArch Capacity Building Grant ScHeme

Additional information

Funding

Deakin University's Health ReseArch Capacity Building Grant ScHeme