Abstract
Objective
Clinical placement is an essential aspect of student training in professional postgraduate psychology. However, students can be exposed to risk during clinical placement. Further, anecdotal evidence suggests that barriers may hinder formal reporting of adverse events occurring during placement. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and nature of psychology students' exposure to risk during clinical placement. This study also sought to explore key stakeholders' perceptions of risks to students engaging in placement.
Method
A sequential explanatory mixed‐method design was utilised. The quantitative element of the study involved a questionnaire capturing the experiences of 70 students currently undertaking clinical psychology placement in healthcare services within Australia. This was followed by qualitative semi‐structured interviews with 10 industry‐based stakeholders associated with clinical placements across seven Australian universities.
Results
Preliminary evidence indicates that psychology students can experience adverse events while on clinical placement, and that industry‐based stakeholders can also encounter professional risk resulting from student contact. Low uptake of formal incident reports among students was demonstrated. The quality of risk‐related training was shown to vary across the industry, indicating a need for streamlined training approaches to risk management. Finally, strategies to support students and supervisors were raised.
Conclusions
Novice students may be inadequately prepared for the risks arising in unpredictable clinical placement milieu. They may also be unaware of their rights and avenues for reporting. Further support and resources designed to equip health services and universities for student exposure to risk during placement is warranted.
Funding information Office for Learning and Teaching, Grant/Award Number: ID16‐5270; Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching
Funding information Office for Learning and Teaching, Grant/Award Number: ID16‐5270; Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Support for this project has been provided by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. The views expressed in this project do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. This project was undertaken within the School of Psychology at Deakin University, in collaboration with the University of Adelaide, the University of Southern Queensland, and the University of New England.
Notes
Funding information Office for Learning and Teaching, Grant/Award Number: ID16‐5270; Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching