1,719
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Maternal perinatal anxiety: A review of prevalence and correlates

, &
Pages 4-19 | Received 08 May 2014, Accepted 07 Jan 2014, Published online: 10 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

Background

A growing body of research has examined maternal anxiety symptoms and disorders during the perinatal period. This systematic review provides an update of the literature reporting on the prevalence and risk factors for maternal perinatal anxiety.

Methods

Three databases (PubMed, PsycInfo and Web of Science) were searched to identify articles focused on the prevalence and risk factors for maternal perinatal anxiety published between 2006 and 2014. Initially, 1416 unique papers were identified, and 98 papers met the inclusion criteria for the review.

Results

Maternal perinatal anxiety is common. The number of studies reporting prevalence estimates for perinatal anxiety disorders has grown; however, there is wide variation in reported estimates (2.6–39% for “any anxiety disorder”). Prominent risk factors identified included socio‐economic disadvantage, history of poor mental health, adverse circumstances around the pregnancy and birth, and poor quality partner relationships. Complexities in reviewing this literature include significant heterogeneity in study methodology.

Conclusions

There is a substantial evidence‐based reporting prevalence estimates and identifying the key risk factors for maternal anxiety during the perinatal period. However, there is further need to synthesise the available literature in a meaningful way in order to translate findings into useful screening tools and intervention programs.

Abstract

Funding: This work was supported by a Movember‐funded beyondblue (Australia) National Priority Driven Research grant, round 2011 (#LEAC11NPD). LL is funded by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship #1035803.

Conflict of interest: None.

Funding: This work was supported by a Movember‐funded beyondblue (Australia) National Priority Driven Research grant, round 2011 (#LEAC11NPD). LL is funded by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship #1035803.

Conflict of interest: None.

Notes

Funding: This work was supported by a Movember‐funded beyondblue (Australia) National Priority Driven Research grant, round 2011 (#LEAC11NPD). LL is funded by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship #1035803.

Conflict of interest: None.

Additional information

Funding

beyondblue
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.