5,194
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Culturally informed case conceptualisation: Developing a clinical psychology approach to treatment planning for non‐Indigenous psychologists working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients

&
Pages 280-289 | Received 12 Apr 2017, Accepted 01 Aug 2017, Published online: 10 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

Background

In the context of the Australian Psychological Society's formal apology and the increasing awareness of the need to develop interventions that improve the social and emotional wellbeing of clients who identify from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural backgrounds, this article considers the clinical psychology case conceptualisation. The primary aim of any case conceptualisation is to inform intervention and, in the initial stages of treatment, is considered important in helping the psychologists to develop a stronger therapeutic relationship whilst also providing a reference point from which to evaluate treatment progress. In other words, it enables practitioners to develop a coherent set of explanatory inferences—based in theory—that describe and explain why the person has a particular problem at a particular time.

Method

The model draws together mainstream case formulation processes with culturally specific understandings of social and emotional health and wellbeing. A worked case example is used in this article to illustrate how the non‐Indigenous psychologist can integrate influence of the broader social and cultural context into the case conceptualisation to enhance culturally responsive practice.

Results

The proposed model provides the psychologist with an entry point for understanding an individual's experience within a broader socio‐historical–political context. The model may help the practitioner to identify areas in which he or she needs to develop their cultural intelligence.

Conclusions

Developing and enhancing culturally responsive practice is a practical way in which clinical psychologists can meaningfully participate in “active reconciliation” within a clinical psychology encounter.

Abstract

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

Notes

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.