117
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Computer vision syndrome in presbyopia and beginning presbyopia: effects of spectacle lens type

, Dr-Ing, , Dipl-Ing, , Dipl-Stat, , Dr Sc Hum & , Dipl Ing
Pages 228-233 | Received 06 Jun 2014, Accepted 30 Sep 2014, Published online: 15 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose

This office field study investigated the effects of different types of spectacle lenses habitually worn by computer users with presbyopia and in the beginning stages of presbyopia. Computer vision syndrome was assessed through reported complaints and ergonomic conditions.

Methods

A questionnaire regarding the type of habitually worn near‐vision lenses at the workplace, visual conditions and the levels of different types of complaints was administered to 175 participants aged 35 years and older (mean ± SD: 52.0 ± 6.7 years). Statistical factor analysis identified five specific aspects of the complaints. Workplace conditions were analysed based on photographs taken in typical working conditions.

Results

In the subgroup of 25 users between the ages of 36 and 57 years (mean 44 ± 5 years), who wore distance‐vision lenses and performed more demanding occupational tasks, the reported extents of ‘ocular strain’, ‘musculoskeletal strain’ and ‘headache’ increased with the daily duration of computer work and explained up to 44 per cent of the variance (rs = 0.66). In the other subgroups, this effect was smaller, while in the complete sample (n = 175), this correlation was approximately rs = 0.2. The subgroup of 85 general‐purpose progressive lens users (mean age 54 years) adopted head inclinations that were approximately seven degrees more elevated than those of the subgroups with single vision lenses.

Conclusions

The present questionnaire was able to assess the complaints of computer users depending on the type of spectacle lenses worn. A missing near‐vision addition among participants in the early stages of presbyopia was identified as a risk factor for complaints among those with longer daily durations of demanding computer work.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Dortmund financial administration at which the field study was conducted and the team that included C. Reiffen, U. Lobisch, J. Keller and P. Weidling.

This study was conducted by the Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors in Dortmund (Germany) and supported in part by Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH in Aalen (Germany). M. Welscher is an employee of Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH and A. Ohlendorf is an employee of Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH.

Additional information

Funding

Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH in Aalen (Germany)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.