119
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Visual field assessment in high myopia with and without tilted optic disc

, MD, , MSc, , MD MSc & , PhD
Pages 690-694 | Received 17 Apr 2016, Accepted 03 Nov 2016, Published online: 15 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Background

The aim was to evaluate the effect of the tilted optic disc on the visual field in highly myopic eyes.

Methods

A total of 58 eyes from 58 highly myopic individuals underwent detailed ophthalmic examination and were categorised into two groups according to the presence of a tilted optic disc. The visual field of 20 eyes (mean age of 28.95 ± 7.22 years) with tilted optic discs were compared with 38 eyes (mean age of 27.87 ± 6.08 years) of control subjects without tilted optic discs using the 30‐2 SITA standard protocol with a Humphrey Field Analyzer – HFA II‐i. Optic disc tilt was assessed from retinal photographs exported to Adobe Photoshop software. Disc ovality was assessed using the ratio of minimum to maximum disc diameter. A ratio of up to 0.80 was considered a tilted optic disc.

Results

Foveal threshold sensitivity showed no statistically significant difference between tilted and non‐tilted groups (35.16 ± 2.71 dB versus 35.37 ± 2.35 dB, p = 0.76). The mean deviation was −3.29 ± 2.03 dB in the tilted group and −3.49 ± 2.56 dB in the non‐tilted group (p = 0.77). Additionally, there were no significant differences in the average deviation between the two groups in four quadrants and four hemifields; however, the lowest average deviation was observed in the superotemporal quadrant in the tilted group (−4.54 ± 3.16 dB). In the non‐tilted group, 29 per cent had no visual field defect, 24 per cent had an arcuate scotoma and 20 per cent had generalised depression. In the tilted group, 30 per cent had an arcuate scotoma, 30 per cent had generalised depression and 13 per cent had no visual field defect. Other visual field defects occurred at frequencies less than 15 per cent in both groups.

Conclusions

The investigation of visual field patterns may be more appropriate than quantitative indices (for example, total mean deviation, foveal threshold sensitivity, average deviation) to assess the visual field in highly myopic patients with tilted optic discs.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by Refractive Errors Research Center of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and the Deputy of Research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran (grant code: 921181).

Additional information

Funding

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.