This article describes an evaluation of fourteen peer-support schemes in seven primary schools and seven secondary schools where NSPCC advisers worked closely with the schools. Each school received a questionnaire at the start of their involvement and, after about 12 months, the researcher visited each of the schools to conduct in-depth interviews with the person who had completed the original questionnaire. The evaluation explored why the schools had undertaken this work and what the potential benefits to the schools and the students were. The details of the schemes and the findings specific to primary and secondary sectors are also discussed. In particular, training, unrealistic expectations about behaviour and the uses of staff times are debated. The author concludes that peer-support schemes can be mistakenly seen as a panacea.
Peer Support: Expectations and Realities
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.